Skip to main content
Log in

Studies of latex blends of natural rubber/poly(methyl methacrylate-co-2-ethylhexyl methacrylate) and their comparison with incompatible natural rubber/poly(methyl methacrylate)

  • Polymer Blends
  • Published:
Polymer Science Series A Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Poly(methyl methacrylate-co-2-ethylhexyl methacrylate) copolymers with 0.6–49.2 mol% of 2-ethylhexyl methacrylate were synthesized and blended with natural rubber at three different blend ratios (i.e. 5/95, 10/90, 15/85) on the latex stage. Chemical structure of the copolymer was confirmed by FTIR and 1H NMR spectroscopy. Mechanical strength of the blend (rubber/copolymer) containing 7.76 mol% of 2-ethylhexyl methacrylate showed the higher values than the incompatible blend natural rubber/PMMA. According to water absorption and ATR-FTIR measurements, the amount of dispersed particles of obtained blends on the surface decreases sharply compared to rubber/PMMA blend. Scanning electron microscopy and atomic force microscopy also showed that surface and cross-section morphologies of the studied were more homogeneous than those of incompatible blend. The miscibility of studied blend was further reflected by DSC analysis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. M. M. Rippel, A. P. L. Carlos, and M. Fernando, Anal. Chem. 74, 2541 (2002).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. P. Piya-areetham, G. L. Rempel, and P. Prasassarakich, Polym. Degrad. Stabil. 102, 112 (2014).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. M. M. Jayasuriya and D. J. Hourston, J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 124, 3558 (2012).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. C. C. Ho, M. C. Knew, and Y. F. Liew, Surf. Interface. Anal. 32, 133 (2001).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. V. Tanrattanakul and T. Kaewprakob, J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 112, 1817 (2009).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. P. Wongthong, C. Nakason, Q. Pan, and G. L. Rempel. Eur. Polm. J. 49, 4035 (2013).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. C. Nakason, W. Pechurai, K. Sahakaro, and A. Kaesaman, J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 99, 1600 (2006).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. C. Nakason, Y. Panklieng, and A. Kaesaman, J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 92, 3561 (2004).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. C. Nakason, S. Saiwaree, S. Tatun, and A. Kaesaman, Polym. Test. 25, 656 (2006).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Z. Oommen and S. Thomas, Polymer 38, 5611 (1997).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. L. H. Sperling, Interpenetrating Polymer Networks and Related Materials (Plenum, New York, 1981).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  12. M. M. Jayasuriya and D. J. Hourston, J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 112, 3217 (2009).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. A. T. Koshy, B. Kuriakose, S. Thomas, and S. Varghese, Polymer 34, 3428 (1993).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. N. Hayeemasae, H. Ismail, and A. R. Azura, Polymplast. Technol. 52, 501 (2013).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. S. Chattopadhyay and S. Sivaram, Polym. Int. 50, 67 (2001).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Z. Mohamad, H. Ismail, and R. C. Thevy, J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 99, 1504 (2006).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. P. Kumari, C. K. Radhakrishnan, S. George, and G. Unnikrishnan, J. Polym. Res. 15, 97 (2008).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. P. Jansen and B. G. Sores, Polym. Degrad. Stabil. 52, 95 (1996).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. J. R. Feng, M. A. Winnik, and A. Siemiarlzuk, J. Polym. Sci., Part B: Polym. Phys. 36, 1115 (1998).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. K. Jud, H. H. Kausch, and J. G. Williams, J. Mater. Sci. 16, 204 (1981).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. G. G. Cameron, D. Stewart, R. Buscall, and J. Nemcek, Polymer 35, 3384 (1994).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. C. C. Ho and M. C. Khew, Langmuir 16, 2436 (2000).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. L. Xie, X. Huang, C. Wu, and P. Jiang, J. Mater. Chem. 21, 5897 (2011).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. P. Bassan, H. J. Byrne, F. Bonnier, J. Lee, P. Dumas, and P. Gardner, Analyst. 134, 1586 (2009).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. S. Dirlikov and J. L. Koenig, Appl. Spectrosc. 33, 555 (1979).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. J. C. O. Villanova, E. Ayres, M. O. Reis, and R. L. Orefice, Polym. Bull. 68, 931 (2012).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. S. Shah, A. Pal, Rajiv Gude, and S. Devi, Eur. Polym. J. 46, 958 (2010).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. L. A. Cannon and R. A. Pethrick, Macromolecules 32, 7617 (1999).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. G. A. Wang, C. C. Wang, and C. Y. Chen, Polym. Degrad. Stabil. 91, 2683 (2006).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. S. Bajpai, J. S. P. Rai, and I. Nigam, J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 122, 3152 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. H. Eslami and S. Zhu, Macromol. Mater. Eng. 291, 1104 (2006).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xiaohui Tian.

Additional information

The article is published in the original.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zheng, Z., Tian, X., Sun, J. et al. Studies of latex blends of natural rubber/poly(methyl methacrylate-co-2-ethylhexyl methacrylate) and their comparison with incompatible natural rubber/poly(methyl methacrylate). Polym. Sci. Ser. A 57, 613–621 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1134/S0965545X15050181

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S0965545X15050181

Keywords

Navigation