Skip to main content
Log in

Two Novel Bessel Matrix Techniques to Solve the Squeezing Flow Problem between Infinite Parallel Plates

  • MATHEMATICAL PHYSICS
  • Published:
Computational Mathematics and Mathematical Physics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study is concerned with the numerical solutions of the squeezing flow problem which corresponds to fourth-order nonlinear equivalent ordinary differential equations with boundary conditions. We have two goals to obtain numerical solutions to the problem in this paper. One of them is to obtain numerical solutions based on the Bessel polynomials of the squeezing flow problem using a collocation method. We call this method the direct method based on the Bessel polynomials. The direct method converts the squeezing flow problem into a system of nonlinear algebraic equations. Next, we aimed to transform the original non-linear problem into a sequence of linear equations with the aid of the technique of quasilinearization then we solve the obtained linear problem by using the Bessel collocation approach. This technique is called the QLM-Bessel method. Both of these techniques produce accurate results when compared to other methods. Error analysis in the weighted \({{L}_{2}}\) and \({{L}_{\infty }}\) norms is presented for the Bessel collocation scheme. Lastly, numerical applications are made on examples and also numerical outcomes are compared with other results available in the literature. It is observe that our results are effective according to other results and also QLM-Bessel method is better than the direct Bessel method.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 4.
Fig. 5.
Fig. 6.
Fig. 7.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. T. C. Papanastasiou, G. C. Georgiou, and A. N. Alexandrou, Viscous Fluid Flow (CRC, Boca Raton, FL, 1994).

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. A. K. Al-Hadhrami, L. Elliot, and D. B. Ingham, “Combined free and forced convection in vertical channels of porous media,” Transp. Porous Med. 49 (3), 265–289 (2002).

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. R. H. Rand and D. Armbruster, Perturbation Methods, Bifurcation Theory and Computer Algebra (Springer, Berlin, 1987).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  4. M. I. Syam and B. S. Attili, “Weighted residual method for obtaining positive solutions of two-point nonlinear boundary value problems,” Appl. Math. Comput. 176 (2), 775–784 (2006).

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. X. Ran, Q. Zhu, and Y. Li, “An explicit series solution of the squeezing flow between two infinite plates by means of the homotopy analysis method,” Commun. Nonlinear Sci. Numer. Simul. 14 (1), 119–132 (2009).

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. J. Stefan, “Versuche über die scheinbare Adhäsion,” Akad. Wiss. Math.-Natur. 69, 713 (1874).

    Google Scholar 

  7. O. Reynolds, “On the theory of lubrication and its application to Mr. Beauchamp tower’s experiments, including an experimental determination of the viscosity of olive oil,” Philos. Trans. R. Soc. London 177, 157–234 (1886).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. J. Prakash and S. Vij, “Load capacity and time-height relations for squeeze films between porous plates,” Wear 24 (3), 309–322 (1973).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. M. I. Khan and F. Alzahrani, “Cattaneo–Christov double diffusion (CCDD) and magnetized stagnation point flow of non-Newtonian fluid with internal resistance of particles,” Phys. Scr. 95 (12), 125002 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. M. I. Khan, S. Qayyum, S. Kadry, W. A. Khan, and S. Z. Abbas, “Irreversibility analysis and heat transport in squeezing nanoliquid flow of non-Newtonian (second-grade) fluid between infinite plates with activation energy,” Arab. J. Sci. Eng. 45 (6), 4939–4947 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Z. Ahmed, S. Saleem, S. Nadeem, and A. U. Khan, “Squeezing flow of carbon nanotubes-based nano fluid in channel considering temperature-dependent viscosity: A numerical approach,” Arab. J. Sci. Eng. (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13369-020-04981-x

  12. M. Idrees, S. Islam, S. I. A. Tirmizi, and S. Haqa, “Application of the optimal homotopy asymptotic method for the solution of the Korteweg–de Vries equation,” Math. Comput. Model. 55, 1324–1333 (2012).

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. A. El-Sayed and M. Gaber, “The Adomian decomposition method for solving partial differential equations of fractal order in finite domains,” Phys. Lett. A 359 (3), 175–182 (2006).

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  14. R. Shah, H. Khan, M. Arif, and P. Kumam, “Application of Laplace–Adomian decomposition method for the analytical solution of third-order dispersive fractional partial differential equations,” Entropy 21 (4), 335 (2019).

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  15. M. Tatari, M. Dehghan, and M. Razzaghi, “Application of the Adomian decomposition method for the Fokker–Planck equation,” Math. Comput. Model. 45 (5–6), 639–650 (2007).

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  16. N. Bildik and A. Konuralp, “The use of variational iteration method, differential transform method and Adomian decomposition method for solving different types of nonlinear partial differential equations,” Int. J. Nonlinear Sci. Numer. Simul. 7 (1), 65–70 (2006).

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  17. A. Babaei, B. Moghaddam, S. Banihashemi, and J. Machado, “Numerical solution of variable-order fractional integro-partial differential equations via sinc collocation method based on single and double exponential transformations,” Commun. Nonlinear Sci. Numer. Simul. 82, 104985 (2020).

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  18. Usman, A. Ghaffari, and S. Kausar, “Numerical solution of the partial differential equations that model the steady three-dimensional flow and heat transfer of Carreau fluid between two stretchable rotatory disks,” Numer. Methods Partial Differ. Equations (2020). https://doi.org/10.1002/num.22672

  19. E. Samaniego, C. Anitescu, S. Goswami, V. Nguyen-Thanh, H. Guo, K. Hamdia, X. Zhuang, and T. Rabczuk, “An energy approach to the solution of partial differential equations in computational mechanics via machine learning: Concepts, implementation and applications,” Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 362, 112790 (2020).

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  20. M. El-Gamel, W. Adel, and M. S. El-Azab, “Two very accurate and efficient methods for solving time-dependent problems,” Appl. Math. 9 (11), 1270–1280 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Z.-J. Liu, M. Adamu, E. Suleiman, and J.-H. He, “Hybridization of homotopy perturbation method and Laplace transformation for the partial differential equations,” Thermal Sci. 21 (4), 1843–1846 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. S. Javeed, D. Baleanu, A. Waheed, M. S. Khan, and H. Affan, “Analysis of homotopy perturbation method for solving fractional order differential equations,” Mathematics 7 (1), 40 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. B. K. Singh and P. Kumar, “Fractional variational iteration method for solving fractional partial differential equations with proportional delay,” Int. J. Differ. Equations 2017, 1–11 (2017).

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  24. M. Nadeem, F. Li, and H. Ahmad, “Modified Laplace variational iteration method for solving fourth-order parabolic partial differential equation with variable coefficients,” Comput. Math. Appl. 78 (6), 2052–2062 (2019).

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  25. N. Bildik and S. Deniz, “Comparative study between optimal homotopy asymptotic method and perturbation-iteration technique for different types of nonlinear equations,” Iran. J. Sci. Technol. Trans. A Sci. 42 (2), 647–654 (2016).

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  26. J. R. Cannon and D. J. Galiffa, “A numerical method for a nonlocal elliptic boundary value problem,” Integr. Equations Appl. 20 (2), 243–261 (2008).

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  27. J. R. Cannon and D. J. Galiffa, “On a numerical method for a homogeneous, nonlinear, nonlocal, elliptic boundary value problem,” Nonlinear Anal.: Theory Methods Appl. 74 (5), 1702–1713 (2011).

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  28. W. Themistoclakis and A. Vecchio, “On the numerical solution of some nonlinear and non-local boundary value problems,” Appl. Math. Comput. 255, 135–146 (2015).

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  29. M. H. Tiwanaa, K. Maqbool, and A. B. Mann, “Homotopy perturbation Laplace transform solution of fractional non-linear reaction diffusion system of Lotka–Volterra type differential equation,” Int. J. Eng. Sci. 20, 672–678 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  30. M. G. Sobamowo and A. T. Akinshilo, “On the analysis of squeezing flow of nanofluid between two parallel plates under the influence of magnetic field,” Alex. Eng. J. 57, 1413–1423 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Q. Ghori, M. Ahmed, and A. Siddiqui, “Application of homotopy perturbation method to squeezing flow of a Newtonian fluid,” Int. J. Nonlinear Sci. Numer. Simul. 8 (2), 179–184 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. O. A. lhan, “Approximation solution of the squeezing flow by the modification of optimal homotopy asymptotic method,” Eur. Phys. J. Plus 135 (9) 1–20 (2020).

  33. M. Izadi and C. Cattani, “Generalized Bessel polynomial for multi-order fractional differential equations,” Symmetry 12 (8), 1260 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. M. Izadi and H. M. Srivastava, “An efficient approximation technique applied to a nonlinear Lane–Emden pantograph delay differential model,” Appl. Math. Comput. 401, 126123 (2021).

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  35. M. Izadi and H.M. Srivastava, “A novel matrix technique for multi-order pantograph differential equations of fractional order,” Proc. Roy. Soc. London Ser. A: Math. Phys. Eng. Sci. 477 (2253), 2021031 (2021).

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  36. Ş. Yüzbaşı, “A collocation method for numerical solutions of fractional-order logistic population model,” Int. J. Biomath. 9 (2), 1650031 (2016).

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  37. M. Izadi, “Comparison of various fractional basis functions for solving fractional-order logistic population model,” Facta Univ. Ser. Math. Inf. 35 (4), 1181–1198 (2020).

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  38. M. Izadi and H. M. Srivastava, “Numerical approximations to the nonlinear fractional-order logistic population model with fractional-order Bessel and Legendre bases,” Chaos Solitons Fract. 145, 110779 (2021).

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  39. Ş. Yüzbaşı, “Numerical solutions of fractional Riccati type differential equations by means of the Bernstein polynomials,” Appl. Math. Comput. 219, 6328–6343 (2013).

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  40. M. Izadi, “A computational algorithm for simulating fractional order relaxation-oscillation equation,” SeMA J. (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40324-021-00266-x

  41. R. E. Bellman and R. E. Kalaba, Quasilinearization and Nonlinear Boundary-Value Problems (Elsevier, New York, 1965).

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  42. V. B. Mandelzweig and F. Tabakin, “Quasilinearization approach to nonlinear problems in physics with application to nonlinear ODEs,” Comput. Phys. Commun. 141, 268–281 (2001).

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  43. M. Izadi, “An approximation technique for first Painlevé equation,” TWMS J. Appl. Eng. Math. 11 (3), 739–750 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to M. Izadi, Ş. Yüzbaşı or W. Adel.

Ethics declarations

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Izadi, M., Yüzbaşı, Ş. & Adel, W. Two Novel Bessel Matrix Techniques to Solve the Squeezing Flow Problem between Infinite Parallel Plates. Comput. Math. and Math. Phys. 61, 2034–2053 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1134/S096554252131002X

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S096554252131002X

Keywords:

Navigation