Abstract
The review discusses the neurophysiological basis of the analysis of complex sentences, such as passives or reverse word order sentences. We adhere to the hypothesis that reanalysis is an obligatory stage of complex sentence processing and is based on the context analysis and integration of semantic and syntactic sentence features. Brain activation patterns observed during the analysis were compared for different complex sentences. It was concluded that, in adults, the same brain regions are involved in the processing of syntactically complex and simple sentences and that only the degree of activation of cerebral structures differs (mostly in the left middle temporal gyrus, left inferior frontal gyrus, and left angular gyrus). The review describes the ontogenesis of brain zones involved in sentence analysis and the pathways that connect the zones. The available data demonstrate that complex sentence processing mechanisms may change with age. A transition to a more productive analysis strategy is based on the ability to use syntactic markers and develops after 6–7 years of age, when the dorsal pathway of speech processing is formed.
Notes
Since the Russian is a free word order language, the example contains the subject (S)—verb (V)—object (O) and OVS sentences.
First example is the SVO sentence in active voice, second is the passive sentence with SVO word order.
First example is the OVS sentence in active voice, second is the passive sentence with OVS word order.
REFERENCES
Bierwisch, M., How on-line is language processing? in The Process of Language Understanding, Flores D’Arcais, G.B. and Jarvella, R.J., Eds., New York: Wiley, 1983, p. 113.
Friederici, A.D., The brain basis of language processing: from structure to function, Physiol. Rev., 2011, vol. 91, no. 4, p. 1357.
Luriya, A.R., Yazyk i soznanie (Language and Consciousness), Khomskaya, E.D., Ed., Rostovon-Don: Feniks, 1998.
Akhutina, T.V.,Velichkovskii, B.M., and Kempe, V., Semantic syntax and orientation on word order in ontogenesis, in Semantika rechevoi deyatel’nosti (Semantics of Speech Activity), Moscow: Nauka, 1988, p. 5.
Akhutina, T.V., Porozhdenie rechi: Neirolingvisticheskii analiz sintaksisa (Origin of Speech: Neuro-Linguistic Analysis of Syntax), Moscow: Mosk. Gos. Univ., 1989.
Abbot-Smith, K., Chang, F., Rowland, C., et al., Do two and three year old children use an incremental first-NP-as-agent bias to process active transitive and passive sentences? A permutation analysis, PLoS One, 2017, vol. 12, no. 10, p. e0 186 129.
Statnikov, A.I., Syndrome analysis of difficulties in understanding of logical-grammatical constructions by children, Nats. Psikhol. Zh., 2015, no. 2 (18), p. 77.
Akhutina, T.V., Korneev, A.A., and Matveeva, E.Yu., Age dynamics of understanding of logical and grammatical constructions by elementary school students and its brain mechanisms, Spets. Obraz., 2017, no. 3 (47), p. 15.
Hickok, G. and Poeppel, D., Dorsal and ventral streams: a framework for understanding aspects of the functional anatomy of language, Cognition, 2004, vol. 92, nos. 1–2, p. 67.
Hickok, G. and Poeppel, D., The cortical organization of speech processing, Nat. Rev. Neurosci., 2007, vol. 8, no. 5, p. 393.
Friederici, A.D., White-matter pathways for speech and language processing, Handb. Clin. Neurol., 2015, vol. 129, p. 177.
Nasios, G., Dardiotis, E., and Messinis, L., From Broca and Wernicke to the neuromodulation era: insights of brain language networks for neurorehabilitation, Behav. Neurol., 2019, vol. 2019, art. ID 9894571.
Gow, Jr., D.W., The cortical organization of lexical knowledge: a dual lexicon model of spoken language processing, Brain Lang., 2012, vol. 121, no. 3, p. 273.
Hickok, G. and Poeppel, D., Neural basis of speech perception, Handb. Clin. Neurol., 2015, vol. 129, p. 149.
Zaehle, T., Geiser, E., Alter, K., et al., Segmental processing in the human auditory dorsal stream, Brain Res., 2008, vol. 1220, p. 179.
Vigneau, M., Beaucousin, V., Hervé, P.Y., et al., Meta-analyzing left hemisphere language areas: phonology, semantics, and sentence processing, NeuroImage, 2005, vol. 30, no. 4, p. 1414.
Vigneau, M., Beaucousin, V., Hervé, P.-Y., et al., What is right-hemisphere contribution to phonological, lexico-semantic, and sentence processing? NeuroImage, 2011, vol. 54, no. 1, p. 577.
Walenski, M., Europa, E., Caplan, D., et al., Neural networks for sentence comprehension and production: an ALE-based meta-analysis of neuroimaging studies, Hum. Brain Mapp., 2019. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbm.24523
Koechlin, E. and Jubault, T., Broca’s area and the hierarchical organization of human behavior, Neuron, 2006, vol. 50, no. 6, p. 963.
Rogalsky, C. and Hickok, G., The role of Broca’s area in sentence comprehension, J. Cognit. Neurosci., 2011, vol. 23, no. 7, p. 1664.
Adank, P., Design choices in imaging speech comprehension: an activation likelihood estimation (ALE) meta-analysis, NeuroImage, 2012, vol. 63, no. 3, p. 1601.
Hertrich, I., Dietrich, S., and Ackermann, H., The role of the supplementary motor area for speech and language processing, Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev., 2016, vol. 68, p. 602.
Pulvermüller, F., Semantic embodiment, disembodiment or misembodiment? In search of meaning in modules and neuron circuits, Brain Lang., 2013, vol. 127, no. 1, p. 86.
Jirak, D., Menz, M.M., Buccino, G., et al., Grasping language—A short story on embodiment, Conscious Cognit., 2010, vol. 19, no. 3, p. 711.
Sakreida, K., Scorolli, C., Menz, M.M., et al., Are abstract action words embodied? An fMRI investigation at the interface between language and motor cognition, Front. Hum. Neurosci., 2013, vol. 7, p. 125.
Yang, J. and Shu, H., Involvement of the motor system in comprehension of non-literal action language: a meta-analysis study, Brain Topogr., 2016, vol. 29, no. 1, p. 94.
Thompson, C.K. and Meltzer-Asscher, A., Neurocognitive mechanisms of verb argument structure processing, in Structuring the Argument: Multidisciplinary Research on Verb Argument Structure, Bachrach, A., Roy, I., and Stockall, L., Eds., Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 2014, p. 141.
Humphries, C., Binder, J.R., Medler, D.A., et al., Syntactic and semantic modulation of neural activity during auditory sentence comprehension, J. Cognit. Neurosci., 2006, vol. 18, no. 4, p. 665.
Mollo, G., Jefferies, E., Cornelissen, P., and Gennari, S.P., Context-dependent lexical ambiguity resolution: MEG evidence for the time-course of activity in left inferior frontal gyrus and posterior middle temporal gyrus, Brain Lang., 2018, vol. 177–178, p. 23.
Davey, J., Thompson, H.E., Hallam, G., et al., Exploring the role of the posterior middle temporal gyrus in semantic cognition: integration of anterior temporal lobe with executive processes, NeuroImage, 2016, vol. 137, p. 165.
Jefferies, E., The neural basis of semantic cognition: converging evidence from neuropsychology, neuroimaging and TMS, Cortex, 2013, vol. 49, no. 3, p. 611.
Tyler, L.K., Randall, B., and Stamatakis, E.A., Cortical differentiation for nouns and verbs depends on grammatical markers, J. Cognit. Neurosci., 2008, vol. 20, no. 8, p. 1381.
Elli, G.V., Lane, C., and Bedny, M.A., A double dissociation in sensitivity to verb and noun semantics across cortical networks, Cereb. Cortex, 2019, vol. 29, no. 11, p. 4803.
Weiner, K.S. and Zilles, K., The anatomical and functional specialization of the fusiform gyrus, Neuropsychologia., 2016, vol. 83, p. 48.
Cohen, L., Lehéricy, S., Chochon, F., et al., Language-specific tuning of visual cortex? Functional properties of the Visual Word Form Area, Brain, 2002, vol. 125, no. 5, p. 1054.
Bonilha, L., Hillis, A.E., Hickok, G., et al., Temporal lobe networks supporting the comprehension of spoken words, Brain, 2017, vol. 140, no. 9, p. 2370.
Forseth, K.J., Kadipasaoglu, C.M., Conner, C.R., et al., A lexical semantic hub for heteromodal naming in middle fusiform gyrus, Brain, 2018, vol. 141, no. 7, p. 2112.
Seghier, M.L., The angular gyrus: multiple functions and multiple subdivisions, Neuroscientist, 2013, vol. 19, no. 1, p. 43.
Obert, A., Gierski, F., Calmus, A., et al., Differential bilateral involvement of the parietal gyrus during predicative metaphor processing: an auditory fMRI study, Brain Lang., 2014, vol. 137, p. 112.
Burks, J.D., Boettcher, L.B., Conner, A.K., et al., White matter connections of the inferior parietal lobule: a study of surgical anatomy, Brain Behav., 2017, vol. 7, no. 4, p. e00 640.
Rosselli, M., Ardila, A., and Bernal, B., Angular gyrus connectivity model for language: a functional neuroimaging meta-analysis, Rev. Neurol., 2015, vol. 60, no. 11, p. 495.
Yue, Q., Zhang, L., Xu, G., et al., Task-modulated activation and functional connectivity of the temporal and frontal areas during speech comprehension, Neuroscience, 2013, vol. 237, p. 87.
Progovac, L., Rakhlin, N., Angell, W., et al., Neural correlates of syntax and proto-syntax: evolutionary dimension, Front. Psychol., 2018, vol. 9, p. 2415.
Zaccarella, E., Schell, M., and Friederici, A.D., Reviewing the functional basis of the syntactic Merge mechanism for language: a coordinate-based activation likelihood estimation meta-analysis, Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev., 2017, vol. 80, p. 646.
Catani, M., Forkel, S., and Thiebaut de Schotten, M., Asymmetry of white matter pathways, in The Two Halves of the Brain, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2009, ch. 7, p. 177.
Panesar, S.S., Yeh, F.C., Jacquesson, T., et al., A quantitative tractography study into the connectivity, segmentation and laterality of the human inferior longitudinal fasciculus, Front. Neuroanat., 2018, vol. 12, p. 47.
Ye, Z. and Zhou, X., Conflict control during sentence comprehension: fMRI evidence, NeuroImage, 2009, vol. 48, no. 1, p. 280.
Europa, E., Gitelman, D.R., Kiran, S., et al., Neural connectivity in syntactic movement processing, Front. Hum. Neurosci., 2019, vol. 13, p. 27.
Yokoyama, S., Watanabe, J., Iwata, K., et al., Is Broca’s area involved in the processing of passive sentences? An event-related fMRI study, Neuropsychologia, 2007, vol. 45, no. 5, p. 989.
Meyer, L. and Friederici, A.D., Neural systems underlying the processing of complex sentences, in Neurobiology of Language, Hickok, G. and Small, S., Eds., Amsterdam: Elsevier, 2015, p. 597.
Tseitlin, S.N., The formation of a child’s intermediate language system: observations on the acquisition of negative constructions, Acta Ling. Petropolitana, 2017, vol. 13-3, p. 623.
Vygotskii, L.S., Development of active attention in childhood, in Khrestomatiya po vnimaniyu (Anthological Publications on Attention), St. Petersburg: Detstvo, 2007.
Gvozdev, A.N., Aspects of Studying Child Speech, St. Petersburg: Detstvo, 2007.
Tseitlin, S.N., Ocherki po slovoobrazovaniyu i formoobrazovaniyu v detskoi rechi (Essays on Word Formation in Child’s Speech), Moscow: Znak, 2009.
Baudouin de Courtenay, J., Versuch einer Theorie phonetischer Alternationen: Ein Kapitel aus der Psychophonetik, Strasburg, 1895.
Dressler, W., On word formation in natural morphology, Wiener Ling. Gaz., 1982, vol. 26, pp. 3–14.
Slobin, D.I., Cognitive prerequisites for the development of grammar, in Studies in Child Language Development, Ferguson, C. and Slobin, D., Eds., New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston, 1973, p. 175.
Tomasello, M., Constructing a language, in A Used-Based Theory of Language Acquisition, Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press, 2003. P. 408.
Brown, R., A First Language: The Early Stages, Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press, 1973, p. 437.
Eliseeva, M.B., Stanovlenie individual’noi iazykovoi sistemy rebenka (The Development of the Individual Language System of a Child), Moscow: Yazyki Slav. Kul’t., 2014.
Kasevich, V.B., Ontolinguistics: typology and language rules, Yazyk Rechevaya Deyat., 1998, vol. 1, p. 31.
Leont’ev, A.A., Osnovy psikholingvistiki (Fundamentals of Psycholinguistics), Moscow: Smysl, 1997.
Shakhnarovich, A.M., Psycholinguistics of communication learning problems in ontogenesis, in Teoreticheskie i prikladnye problemy rechevogo obshcheniya (Theoretical and Applied Problems in Speech Communication), Moscow: Nauka, 1979.
Dmitrievskii, A.A., Practical notes on Russian syntax, Filols.Zap., 1877, vol. 4, p. 3.
Tesnière, L., Eléments de Syntaxe Structurale, Paris: Klincksieck, 1959.
Gagarina, N.V., Stanovlenie grammaticheskikh kategorii russkogo glagola v detskoi rechi (Acquisition of Grammatical Categories of Russian Verb in Child’s Speech), St. Petersburg: Nauka, 2008.
Tomasello, M., Do young children have adult syntactic competence? Cognition, 2000, vol. 74, no. 3, p. 209.
Slobin, D.I. and Greene, J., Psycholinguistics: Chomsky and Psychology, Baltimore: Penguin, 1972.
Tseitlin, S.N., Yazyk i rebenok: Lingvistika detskoi rechi. Uchebnoe posobie dlya studentov vysshikh uchebnykh zavedenii (Language and a Child. Linguistic of Child’s Speech: Manual for Higher Education Institutions), Moscow: Vlados, 2000.
Guillemard, D., Galperina, E., Panasevich, E., et al., EEG-correlates of complex syntactic constructions processing in Russian-speaking children of 5–6 years old, Clin. Pathophysiol., 2016, vol. 22, no. 1, p. 80.
El’konin, D.B., Detskaya psikhologiya: uchebnoe posobie dlya studentov vysshikh uchbenykh zavedenii (Child’s Psychology: Manual for Students of Higher Education Institutions), Moscow: Akademiya, 2004.
Hoff, E. and Shatz, M., Blackwell Handbook of Language Development, Oxford: Blackwell, 2007.
Tseitlin, S.N., Ocherki po slovoobrazovaniyu i formoobrazovaniyu v detskoi rechi (Research Works on Word Formation in Child’s Speech), Moscow: Znak, 2009.
Ostvik, L., Eikeseth, S., and Klintwall, L., Grammatical constructions in typical developing children: effects of explicit reinforcement, automatic reinforcement and parity, Anal. Verbal. Behav., 2012, vol. 28, no. 1, p. 73.
Vasilyeva, M. and Waterfall, H., Beyond syntactic priming: evidence for activation of alternative syntactic structures, J. Child Lang., 2012, vol. 39, no. 2, p. 258.
Wright, A.N., The role of modeling and automatic reinforcement in the construction of the passive voice, Anal. Verbal. Behav., 2006, vol. 22, p. 153.
Allen, S.E.M. and Crago, M.B., Early passive acquisition in Inuktitut, J. Child Lang., 1996, vol. 23, no. 1, p. 129.
Demuth, K., Subject, topic and Sesotho passive, J. Child. Lang., 1990, vol. 17, no. 1, p. 67.
Fox, D. and Grodzinsky, Y., Children’s passive: a view from the by-phrase, Ling. Inquiry, 1998, vol. 29, no. 2, p. 311.
Vasilyeva, M., Huttenlocher, J., and Waterfall, H., Effects of language intervention on syntactic skill levels of preschoolers, Dev. Psychol., 2006, vol. 42, no. 1, p. 164.
Berman, R.A., The acquisition of Hebrew, in The Crosslinguistic Study of Language Acquisition, Vol. 1: The Data, Slobin, D.I., Ed., Boca Raton: CRC Press, 1985, p. 255.
Vissiennon, K., Friederici, A.D., Brauer, J., et al., Functional organization of the language network in three- and six-year-old children, Neuropsychologia., 2017, vol. 98, p. 24.
Wu, C.Y., Vissiennon, K., Friederici, A.D., et al., Preschoolers’ brains rely on semantic cues prior to the mastery of syntax during sentence comprehension, NeuroImage, 2016, vol. 126, p. 256.
Strotseva-Feinschmidt, A., Schipke, C.S., Gunter, T.C., et al., Young children’s sentence comprehension: neural correlates of syntax-semantic competition, Brain Cognit., 2019, vol. 134, p. 110.
Giedd, J.N., Raznahan, A., Alexander-Bloch, A., et al., Child psychiatry branch of the National Institute of Mental Health longitudinal structural magnetic resonance imaging study of human brain development, Neuropsychopharmacology., 2015, vol. 40, no. 1, p. 43.
Tanaka, C., Matsui, M., Uematsu, A., et al., Developmental trajectories of the fronto-temporal lobes from infancy to early adulthood in healthy individuals, sDev. Neurosci., 2012, vol. 34, no. 6, p. 477.
Courchesne, E., Chisum, H.J., Townsend, J., et al., Normal brain development and aging: quantitative analysis at in vivo MR imaging in healthy volunteers, Radiology, 2000, vol. 216, no. 3, p. 672.
Taki, Y. and Kawashima, R., Brain development in childhood, Open Neuroimaging J., 2012, vol. 6, p. 103.
Lenroot, R.K. and Giedd, J.N., Brain development in children and adolescents: insights from anatomical magnetic resonance imaging, Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev., 2006, vol. 30, no. 6, p. 718.
Shaw, P., Kabani, N.J., Lerch, J.P., et al., Neurodevelopmental trajectories of the human cerebral cortex, J. Neurosci., 2008, vol. 28, no. 14, p. 3586.
Sowell, E.R., Peterson, B.S., Kan, E., et al., Sex differences in cortical thickness mapped in 176 healthy individuals between 7 and 87 years of age, Cereb. Cortex, 2007, vol. 17, no. 7, p. 1550.
Weiss-Croft, L.J. and Baldeweg, T., Maturation of language networks in children: A systematic review of 22 years of functional MRI, NeuroImage, 2015, vol. 123. P. 269.
Skeide, M.A., Brauer, J., and Friederici, A.D., Syntax gradually segregates from semantics in the developing brain, NeuroImage, 2014, vol. 100, p. 106.
Brauer J., Anwander A., and Friederici A., Neuroanatomical prerequisites for language functions in the maturing brain, Cereb. Cortex, 2011, vol. 21, no. 2, p. 459.
Judaš, M. and Cepanec, M., Adult structure and development of the human fronto-opercular cerebral cortex (Broca’s region), Clin. Linguist. Phonetics, 2007, vol. 21, nos. 11–12, p. 975.
Imperati, D., Colcombe, S., Kelly, C., et al., Differential development of human brain white matter tracts, PLoS One., 2011, vol. 6, no. 8, p. e23 437.
Lebel, C. and Beaulieu, C., Longitudinal development of human brain wiring continues from childhood into adulthood, J. Neurosci., 2011, vol. 31, no. 30, p. 10 937.
Dubois, J., Hertz-Pannier, L., Dehaene-Lambertz, G., et al., Assessment of the early organization and maturation of infants’ cerebral white matter fiber bundles: A feasibility study using quantitative diffusion tensor imaging and tractography, NeuroImage, 2006, vol. 30, no. 4, p. 1121.
Perani, D., Saccuman, M.C., Scifo, P., et al., Neural language networks at birth, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 2011, vol. 108, no. 38, p. 16 056.
Brauer, J., Anwander, A., Perani, D., et al., Dorsal and ventral pathways in language development, Brain Lang., 2013, vol. 127, no. 2, p. 289.
Eluvathingal, T.J., Hasan, K.M., Kramer, L., et al., Quantitative diffusion tensor tractography of association and projection fibers in normally developing children and adolescents, Cereb. Cortex, 2007, vol. 17, no. 12, p. 2760.
Xiao, Y., Friederici, A.D., Margulies, D.S., et al., Development of a selective left-hemispheric fronto-temporal network for processing syntactic complexity in language comprehension, Neuropsychologia., 2016, vol. 83, p. 274.
Xiao, Y., Friederici, A.D., Margulies, D.S., et al., Longitudinal changes in resting-state fMRI from age 5 to age 6 years covary with language development, NeuroImage, 2016, vol. 128, p. 116.
Friederici, A.D., Brauer, J., and Lohmann, G., Maturation of the language network: from inter- to intrahemispheric connectivities, PLoS One, 2011, vol. 6, no. 6, p. e20 726.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
We are grateful to O.V. Kruchinina for help in manuscript preparation.
Funding
This work was supported by the Russian Foundation for Basic Research (project no. A 19-013-00923).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest. The authors declare that they have no real or potential conflict of interest.
This article does not contain any studies involving animals or human subjects performed by any of the authors.
Additional information
Translated by T. Tkacheva
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Stankova, E.P., Guillemard, D.M. & Galperina, E.I. Morpho-Functional Basis of Complex Sentence Processing in Adults and Children. Hum Physiol 46, 332–342 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1134/S0362119720030135
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S0362119720030135