Skip to main content
Log in

Physico-Chemical Characterization of Permutated Variants of Chaperone GroEL Apical Domain

  • Published:
Applied Biochemistry and Microbiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

At biosynthetic production of hydrophobic recombinant proteins there is often a problem of their aggregation in so-called inclusion bodies, after which these proteins are difficult to renature. Obtaining such proteins in soluble forms is a formidable obstacle on the way of using them. One of possible solutions for this problem is the creation of fusion constructs with a leading protein. Previously, we have developed a system for biosynthetic production of insoluble hydrophobic proteins as a part of a fusion construct with a leader based on chaperone GroEL apical domain (GrAD, GroEL Apical Domain). Expressed as a part of a fusion with GrAD, two initially insoluble proteins were successfully obtained in soluble form. Still, such a system may have limitations in use, because supporting hydrophobic proteins in soluble state requires their interaction with GrAD substrate binding surface, which implies correct mutual orientation of proteins constituent parts of the construct, and for some target proteins such interaction may be sterically impeded. To enlarge the capability of using GrAD, the strategy of making permutations was used, which consists in linking original GrAD N- and C-termini with a linker and creating new N- and C-termini situated in closer proximity to the GrAD substrate binding surface. This work describes production and the study of physico-chemical properties of two permutated GrAD variants intended to be used as leaders in fusion constructs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 4.
Fig. 5.
Fig. 6.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. Terpe, K., Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol., 2003, vol. 60, no. 5, pp. 523–533.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Riggs, P., La Vallie, E.R., and McCoy, J.M., Curr. Protoc. Mol. Biol., Frederick, M. and Ausubel, Al., Eds., 2001, chapter 16, unit 16.4A.

  3. Waugh, D.S., Trends Biotechnol., 2005, vol. 23, no. 6, pp. 316–320.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Schmidt, S.R., Curr. Opin. Drug Discov. Dev., 2009, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 284–295.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Esposito, D. and Chatterjee, D.K., Curr. Opin. Biotechnol., 2006, vol. 17, no. 4, pp. 353–358.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Panavas, T., Sanders, C., and Butt, T.R., Methods Mol. Biol. Clifton N.J., 2009, vol. 497, pp. 303–317.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Kapust, R.B., and Waugh, D.S., Protein Sci. Publ. Protein Soc.,1999, vol. 8, no. 8, pp. 1668–1674.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Huth, J.R., Bewley, C.A., Jackson, B.M., Hinnebusch, A.G., Clore, G.M., and Gronenborn, A.M., Protein Sci. Publ. Protein Soc., 1997, vol. 6, no. 11, pp. 2359–2364.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Walls, D. and Loughran, S.T., Methods Mol. Biol. Clifton N.J., 2011, vol. 681, pp. 151–175.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Zou, Z., Cao, L., Zhou, P., Su, Y., Sun, Y., and Li, W., J. Biotechnol., 2008, vol. 135, no. 4, pp. 333–339.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Santner, A.A., Croy, C.H., Vasanwala, F.H., Uversky, V.N., Van, Y.-Y.J., and Dunker, A.K., Biochemistry (Moscow), 2012, vol. 51, no. 37, pp. 7250–7262.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Kyratsous, C.A. and Panagiotidis, C.A., Methods Mol. Biol. Clifton NJ, 2012, vol. 824, pp. 109–129.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Furutani, M., Hata, J., Shomura, Y., Itami, K., Yoshida, T., Izumoto, Y., Togi, A., Ideno, A., Yasunaga, T., Miki, K., Maruyama, T., Protein Sci. Publ. Protein Soc., 2005, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 341–350.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Fedorov, A.N. and Yurkova, M.S., NanoWorld J., 2018, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 8–15.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Chatellier, J., Hill, F., Lund, P.A., and Fersht, A.R., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 1998, vol. 95, no. 17, pp. 9861–9866.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Wang, Q., Buckle, A.M., and Fersht, A.R., J. Mol. Biol., 2000, vol. 298, no. 5, pp. 917–926.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Altamirano, M.M., Golbik, R., Zahn, R., Buckle, A.M., and Fersht, A.R., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 1997, vol. 94, no. 8, pp. 3576–3578.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Wang, Q., Buckle, A.M., and Fersht, A.R., J. Mol. Biol., 2000, vol. 304, no. 5, pp. 873–881.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Sharapova, O.A., Yurkova, M.S., and Fedorov, A.N., Protein Eng. Des. Sel. PEDS, 2016, vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 57–64.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Bliven, S. and Prlić, A., PLoS Comput. Biol., 2012, vol. 8, no. 3. e1002445.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Jung, J. and Lee, B., Protein Sci. Publ. Protein Soc., 2001, vol. 10, no. 9, pp. 1881–1886.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Yu, Y. and Lutz, S., Trends Biotechnol., 2011, vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 18–25.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Goldenberg, D.P. and Creighton, T.E., J. Mol. Biol., 1983, vol. 165, no. 2, pp. 407–413.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Luger, K., Hommel, U., Herold, M., Hofsteenge, J., and Kirschner, K., Science, 1989, vol. 243, no. 4888, pp. 206–210.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Bulaj, G., Koehn, R.E., and Goldenberg, D.P., Protein Sci. Publ. Protein Soc., 2004, vol. 13, no. 5, pp. 1182–1196.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Capraro, D.T., Roy, M., Onuchic, J.N., and Jennings, P.A., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 2008, vol. 105, no. 39, pp. 14844–14848.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Viguera, A.R., Serrano, L., and Wilmanns, M., Nat. Struct. Biol., 1996, vol. 3, no. 10, pp. 874–880.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Zhang, P. and Schachman, H.K., Protein Sci. Publ. Protein Soc., 1996, vol. 5, no. 7, pp. 1290–1300.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Topell, S., Hennecke, J., and Glockshuber, R., FEBS Lett., 1999, vol. 457, no. 2, pp. 283–289.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Cheltsov, A.V., Barber, M.J., and Ferreira, G.C., J. Biol. Chem., 2001, vol. 276, no. 22, pp. 19141–19149.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Whitehead, T.A., Bergeron, L.M., and Clark, D.S., Protein Eng. Des. Sel. PEDS, 2009, vol. 22, no. 10, pp. 607–613.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Qian, Z. and Lutz, S., J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2005, vol. 127, no. 39, pp. 13466–13467.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Hua, Q., Dementieva, I.S., Walsh, M.A., Hallenga, K., Weiss, M.A., and Joachimiak, A., J. Mol. Biol., 2001, vol. 306, no. 3, pp. 513–525.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Kurov, K.A., Savvin, O.I., Yurkova, M.S., Zenin, V.A., Nagibina, G.S., Melnik, B.S., and Fedorov, A.N., Biotekhnologiya, 2018, vol. 34, no. 6, pp. 43–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Uversky, V.N., J. Biol. Chem., 2016, vol. 291, no. 13, pp. 6681–6688.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Altamirano, M.M., Woolfson A., Donda A., Shamshiev, A., Briseño-Roa, L., Foster, N.W., Veprintsev, D.B., De Libero, G., Fersht, A.R. and Milstein C., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 2001. vol. 98, no. 6, pp. 3288–3293.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Ben-Zvi, A.P., Chatellier, J., Fersht, A.R., and Goloubinoff, P., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 1998, vol. 95, no. 26, pp. 15275–15280.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Karadimitris, A., Gadola, S., Altamirano, M., Brown, D., Woolfson, A., Klenerman, P., Chen, J.L., Koezuka, Y., Roberts, I.A., Price, D.A., Dusheiko, G., Milstein, C., Fersht, A., Luzzatto, L., Cerundolo, V. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 2001, vol. 98, no. 6, pp. 3294–3298.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Priya, S., Sharma, S. K., Sood, V., Mattoo, R.U., Finka, A., Azem, A., De Los Rios, P., Goloubinoff, P., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 2013, vol. 110, no. 18, pp. 7199–7204.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

The work was supported by the Ministry of science and higher education of the Russian Federation, unique identifier RFMEFI57517X0151.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. N. Fedorov.

Ethics declarations

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest. This article does not contain any studies involving animals or human participants performed by any of the authors.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yurkova, M.S., Zenin, V.A., Nagibina, G.S. et al. Physico-Chemical Characterization of Permutated Variants of Chaperone GroEL Apical Domain. Appl Biochem Microbiol 55, 588–595 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1134/S0003683819130027

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S0003683819130027

Keywords:

Navigation