Acoustic microimaging (AMI) is a common nondestructive tool for failure analysis of microelectronic packages. Accurate estimation of the reflected ultrasonic echoes is essential for detection and location of defects inside the microelectronic packages. In this paper, an advanced AMI technique based on adaptive sparse representations is proposed to estimate the ultrasonic echoes and recover the reflectivity function. An adapted overcomplete dictionary capable of concise expression of ultrasonic signals is first learned by the focal underdetermined system solver-based column normalized dictionary learning algorithm. The ultrasonic A-scans generated by an AMI system are then decomposed into adaptive sparse representations over the learned dictionary using a sparse basis selection algorithm. Echo selection and echo estimation are further performed from the resulting adaptive sparse representations. The proposed technique offers a solution to the blind source separation problem for restoration of the reflectivity function and can separate closely spaced overlapping echoes beyond the resolution of the AMI system. Experimental verifications are carried out using both synthetic and measured data. The results show the proposed technique produces high resolution and accurate estimates for ultrasonic echoes.

1.
G.-M.
Zhang
,
D. M.
Harvey
, and
D. R.
Braden
, “
Advanced acoustic micro imaging using sparse signal representation for the evaluation of microelectronic packages
,”
IEEE Trans. Adv. Packag.
29
(
2
),
271
283
(
2006
).
2.
G.-M.
Zhang
,
D. M.
Harvey
, and
D. R.
Braden
, “
An improved acoustic microimaging technique with learning overcomplete representation
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
118
,
3706
3720
(
2005
).
3.
G.-M.
Zhang
,
D. M.
Harvey
, and
D. R.
Braden
, “
Resolution improvement of acoustic micro imaging by continuous wavelet transform for semiconductor inspection
,”
Microelectron. Reliab.
46
(
5-6
),
811
821
(
2006
).
4.
M.
Davies
, “
Simple mixture model for sparse overcomplete ICA
,”
IEE Proc. Vision Image Signal Process.
15
(
1
),
35
43
(
2004
).
5.
D. P.
Wipf
and
B. D.
Rao
, “
Sparse Bayesian learning for basis selection
,”
IEEE Trans. Signal Process.
52
(
8
),
2153
2164
(
2004
).
6.
K.
Kreurz-Delgado
,
J. F.
Murray
, and
B. D.
Rao
, “
Dictionary learning algorithms for sparse representation
,”
Neural Comput.
15
,
349
396
(
2003
).
7.
M. S.
Lewicki
and
T. J.
Sejnowski
, “
Learning overcomplete representations
,”
Neural Comput.
12
,
337
365
(
2000
).
8.
B. D.
Rao
and
K.
Kreurz-Delgado
, “
An affine scaling methodology for best basis selection
,”
IEEE Trans. Signal Process.
47
(
1
),
187
200
(
1999
).
9.
I.
Daubechies
, “
The wavelet transform, time-frequency localization and signal analysis
,”
IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory
36
(
5
),
961
1005
(
1990
).
10.
S. G.
Mallat
and
Z.
Zhang
, “
Matching pursuit with time-frequency dictionaries
,”
IEEE Trans. Signal Process.
41
(
12
),
3397
3415
(
1993
).
11.
M. S.
Lewicki
and
B. A.
Olshausen
, “
Probabilistic framework for the adaptation and comparison of image codes
,”
J. Opt. Soc. Am. A
16
(
7
),
1587
1601
(
1999
).
12.
B. A.
Olshausen
and
D. J.
Field
, “
Emergence of simple-cell receptive field properties by learning a sparse code for natural images
,”
Nature (London)
381
,
607
609
(
1996
).
13.
M. E.
Tipping
, “
Sparse Bayesian Learning and the Relevance Vector Machine
,”
J. Mach. Learn. Res.
1
,
211
244
(
2001
).
You do not currently have access to this content.