Abstract
The interaction between the cylinders of an inflatable penile prosthesis (IPP) and the surrounding tissues during IPP-aided erection may result in local elevated stresses. These stresses may reach values that can obstruct penile blood vessels and cause ischemia and/or stimulate nerves around the operation site, thereby inducing sensations of pain. A new numerical model was used to analyze penile stresses postimplantation of different IPP types, in order to optimize prosthesis design and surgical positioning by enabling minimal stress transfer to dorsal blood vessels and nerves. The results suggest that intraluminal pressures should be maintained at low levels (about 80 kPa) while cylinder thickness and stiffness should be kept just high enough (approximately 15% of the radius and 1000 MPa, respectively) to eliminate deleterious cylinder-tissue contact stresses. Smaller prosthetic cylinders, i.e., occupying about 45% of the cavernosal space, may be advantageous in terms of reducing dorsal stresses, but lower penile rigidity should be expected. A significant decrease of dorsal stresses can also be achieved by encouraging the surgeon to position the cylinders toward the lower part of the corpora. The numerical simulations indicate that circular cylinders may allow greater biomechanical compatibility of the IPP with the penis structure than elliptic ones, and this should be a subject for clinical investigations. © 2000 Biomedical Engineering Society.
PAC00: 8780-y, 8719Rr, 0270Dh
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
Bitsch, M., B. Kromann-Andersen, J. Schou, and E. Sjontoft. The elasticity and tensile strength of the tunica albuginea. J.Urol.(Baltimore)143:642–645, 1990.
Campbell, J. N., S. N. Raja, R. A. Meyer, and S. E. MacKinnon. Myelinated afferents signal the hyperalgesia associated with nerve injury. Pain32:89–94, 1988.
Gefen, A., J. Chen, and D. Elad. Stresses in the normal and diabetic human penis following implantation of an inflatable prosthesis. Med.Biol.Eng.Comput.37:625–631, 1999.
Govier, F. E., R. P. Gibbons, R. J. Correa, T. R. Pritchett, and L. D. Kramer. Mechanical reliability, surgical complications, and patient and partner satisfaction of the modern three-piece inflatable penile prosthesis. Urology52:282–286, 1998.
Hsu, G. L., G. Brock, L. Martinez-Pineiro, B. von Heyden, T. Lue, and E. A. Tanagho. Anatomy and strength of the tunica albuginea: Its relevance to penile prosthesis extrusion. J.Urol.(Baltimore)151:1205–1208, 1994.
McLaren, R. H., and D. M. Barrett. Patient and partner sat-isfaction with the AMS 700 penile prosthesis. J.Urol.(Bal-timore)147:62–65, 1992.
Merrill, D. C. Mentor inflatable penile prosthesis. Urology22:504–505, 1983.
Moncada, I., J. J. Hernandez, L. Hernandez, J. Lafuente, E. Lledo, E. Rodriguez, and I. Saenz De Tejada. Buckling of cylinders may cause prolonged penile pain after prosthesis implantation: A case control study using magnetic resonance imaging of the penis. J.Urol.(Baltimore)160:67–71, 1998.
Nickas, M. E., R. Kessler, and J. N. Kabalin. Long-term experience with controlled expansion cylinders in the AMS 700CX inflatable penile prosthesis and comparison with earlier versions of the Scott inflatable penile prosthesis. Urology44:400–403, 1994.
Niv, D., and M. Devor. Does the blockade of surgical pain preempt postoperative pain and prevent its transition to chronicity? JASP Newsletter6:2–7, 1993.
Park, J. B. Biomaterials Science and Engineering.(New York, Plenum, 1984)
Pescatory, E. S., and I. Goldstein. Intraluminal device pressures in 3-piece inflatable penile prostheses: The “patho-physiology” of mechanical malfunction. J.Urol.(Baltimore)149:295–300, 1993.
Quesada, E. T., and J. K. Light. The AMS 700 inflatable prosthesis: Long-term experience with the controlled expansion cylinders. J.Urol.(Baltimore)149:46–48, 1998.
Scott, F. B., W. E. Bradley, and G. W. Timm. Management of erectile impotence. Use of implantable inflatable prosthesis. Urology2:80–82, 1973.
Steinkohl, W. B., and G. E. Leach. Mechanical complications associated with Mentor inflatable penile prosthesis. Urology38:32–34, 1991.
Torebjork, H. E., L. E. R. Lundberg, and R. H. LaMotte. Central changes in processing of mechanoreceptive input in capsaicin-induced secondary hyperalgesia in humans. J.Physiol. 448: 765–780, 1992.
Venegas, J. G., M. P. Sullivan, S. B. Yalla, and M. A. Vickers. Assessment and modeling of the physical compo-nents of human corporovenous function. Am.J.Physiol.269:2109–2123, 1995.
Whalen, R. K., and D. C. Merrill. Patient satisfaction with Mentor inflatable penile prosthesis. Urology37:531–539, 1991.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Gefen, A., Chen, J. & Elad, D. Optimization of Design and Surgical Positioning of Inflatable Penile Prostheses. Annals of Biomedical Engineering 28, 619–628 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1114/1.1306345
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1114/1.1306345