Acta Univ. Agric. Silvic. Mendelianae Brun. 2015, 63(6), 2213-2220 | DOI: 10.11118/actaun201563062213

Pilot Analysis of the Behaviour of Companies Within the 3rd Trading Period of the EU ETS in the Czech Republic

Jarmila Zimmermannová
Department of Economics, Moravian University College Olomouc, tř. Kosmonautů 1288/1, 779 00 Olomouc, Czech Republic

This paper is focused on the first ex-post analysis of the EU ETS in its 3rd trading period in the Czech Republic, based on the analysis of the behaviour of the key EU ETS sector - combustion processes - and the decision making of Czech electricity and heat producers within the EU ETS. Firstly, the general overview of the EU ETS is presented, including the important scientific studies in this area. The characteristics of the EU ETS in the Czech Republic are described. The second chapter, methodology and data, describes the method, the questionnaire survey. The key chapter, results, focuses on the most important outputs obtained from the questionnaire survey. The discussion part deals with particular characteristics of the EU ETS in the 3rd trading period in the Czech Republic. Focusing on the behaviour of Czech companies in the analyzed period, it is obvious, that the companies within the combustion processes group understood the EU ETS much more as an additional environmental tax or fee, instead of commodity, which can be traded on the exchange. Moreover, the EU ETS had no impact on their environmental investments planning in years 2013 and 2014.

Keywords: EU ETS, 3rd trading period, decision making, combustion processes, ex post analysis, questionnaire survey, Czech Republic
Grants and funding:

This research was supported by the grant [No. P403/12/1811] provided by the Czech Science Foundation.

Prepublished online: December 26, 2015; Published: January 1, 2016  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Zimmermannová, J. (2015). Pilot Analysis of the Behaviour of Companies Within the 3rd Trading Period of the EU ETS in the Czech Republic. Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis63(6), 2213-2220. doi: 10.11118/actaun201563062213
Download citation

References

  1. AATOLA, P., OLLIKAINEN, M. and TOPPINEN, A. 2013. Price determination in the EU ETS market: Theory and econometric analysis with market fundamentals. Energy Economics, 36(March 2013): 380-395. DOI: 10.1016/j.eneco.2012.09.009 Go to original source...
  2. BENZ, E. and TRÜCK, S. 2009. Modeling the Price Dynamics of CO2 Emission Allowances. Energy Economics, 31(1): 44-15. DOI: 10.1016/j.eneco.2008.07.003 Go to original source...
  3. ČERMÁK, P., ZIMMERMANNOVÁ, J., LAVRINČÍK, J., POKORNÝ, M. and MARTINŮ, J. 2015. The Broker Simulation Model in the Emission Allowances Trading Area. International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, 5(1): 80-95.
  4. CHMI. 2015. Emissions of Greenhouse Gases. [Online]. Available at: http://portal.chmi.cz/files/portal/docs/uoco/isko/grafroc/groc/gr12cz/kap12.htm. [Accessed: 12 June 2015].
  5. CONRAD, C., RITTLER, D. and ROTFUß, W. 2012. Modeling and explaining the dynamics of European Union Allowance prices at high-frequency. Energy Economics, 34(January): 316-326. DOI: 10.1016/j.eneco.2011.02.011 Go to original source...
  6. EEX. 2015. EU Emission Allowances - Prices and Trading Volumes. [Online]. Available at: https://www.eex.com/en/market-data/emission-allowances/auction-market. [Accessed: 12 June 2015].
  7. EUROPEAN COMMISSION. 2013. The EU Emissions Trading System (EU ETS). European Union, October 2013.
  8. FALBO, P., FELLETTI, D. and STEFANI, S. 2013. Free EUAs and fuel switching. Energy Economics, 35(January): 14-21. DOI: 10.1016/j.eneco.2011.12.007 Go to original source...
  9. FENG, Z. H., WEI, Y. M. and WANG, K. 2012. Estimating risk for the carbon market via extreme value theory: An empirical analysis of the EU ETS. Applied Energy, 99: 97-108. DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2012.01.070 Go to original source...
  10. GARCÍA-MARTOS, C., RODRÍGUEZ, J. and SÁNCHEZ, M. J. 2013. Modelling and Forecasting Fossil Fuels, CO2 and Electricity Prices and their Volatilities. Applied Energy, 101(January): 363-375. DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2012.03.046 Go to original source...
  11. LECUYER, O. and QUIRION, P. 2013. Can Uncertainty Justify Overlapping Policy Instruments to Mitigate Emissions? Ecological Economics, 93(September): 177-191. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2013.05.009 Go to original source...
  12. LI, M. W., LI, Y. P. and HUANG, G. H. 2011. An Interval-Fuzzy Two-Stage Stochastic Programming Model for Planning Carbon Dioxide Trading under Uncertainty. Energy, 36(9): 5677-5689. DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2011.06.058 Go to original source...
  13. LOFGREN, A., WRAKE, M., HAGBERG, T. and ROTH, S. 2014. Why the EU ETS needs reforming: an empirical analysis of the impact on company investments". Climate Policy, 14(5): 537-558. DOI: 10.1080/14693062.2014.864800 Go to original source...
  14. LOVELL, H., BEBBINGTON, J., LARRINAGA, C. and DE AGUIAR, T. R. S. 2013. Putting carbon markets into practice: a case study of financial accounting in Europe. Environment and Planning C-Government and Policy, 31(4): 741-757. DOI: 10.1068/c1275 Go to original source...
  15. LUTZ, B. J., PIGORSCH, U. and ROTFUß, W. 2013. Nonlinearity in cap-and-trade systems: The EUA price and its fundamentals. Energy Economics, 40(November): 222-232. DOI: 10.1016/j.eneco.2013.05.022 Go to original source...
  16. MARTIN, R., MUULS, M., DE PREUX, L. B. and WAGNER, U. J. 2014. On the empirical content of carbon leakage criteria in the EU Emissions Trading Scheme. Ecological Economics, 105: 78-88. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2014.05.010 Go to original source...
  17. NOVÁK, P. and POPESKO, B. 2014. Cost Variability and Cost Behaviour in Manufacturing Enterprises. Economics and Sociology, 7(4): 89-103. DOI: 10.14254/2071-789X.2014/7-4/6 Go to original source...
  18. PAVEL, J. and VÍTEK, L. 2012. Transaction costs of environmental taxation: the administrative burden. In: MILNE, J. E., ANDERSEN, M. S. (eds.), Handbook of Research on Environmental Taxation. Edward Elgar Pub, 273-282. Go to original source...
  19. ROGGE, K. S., SCHNEIDER, M. and HOFFMANN, V. H. 2011. The innovation impact of the EU Emission Trading System - Findings of company case studies in the German power sector. Ecological Economics, 70(January): 513-523. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2010.09.032 Go to original source...
  20. SOLILOVÁ, V. and NERUDOVÁ, D. 2014. Overall Approach of the EU in the Question of Emissions: EU Emissions Trading System and CO2 Taxation. Procedia Economics and Finance, 12: 616-625. DOI: 10.1016/S2212-5671(14)00386-4 Go to original source...
  21. SOLILOVÁ, V. and NERUDOVÁ, D. 2015. Evaluation of Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Related Aspects: Case of the Czech Republic. Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis, 63(1): 281-292. DOI: 10.11118/actaun201563010281 Go to original source...
  22. WETTESTAD, J., EIKELAND, P. O. and NILSSON, M. 2012. EU Climate and Energy Policy: A Hesitant Supranational Turn? Global Environmental Politics, 12(2): 65-84. DOI: 10.1162/GLEP_a_00109 Go to original source...
  23. ZIMMERMANNOVÁ, J. and ČERMÁK, P. 2015. Emission allowances trading vs. environmental taxation: the case study of Czech Republic. Actual Problems of Economics, 163(1): 328-337.
  24. ZIMMERMANNOVÁ, J. and MENŠÍK, M. 2013. Ex-Post Analysis of Solid Fuels, Natural Gas and Electricity Taxation Introduction [in Czech: Ex post analýza zavedení zdanění pevných paliv, zemního plynu a elektřiny]. Politická ekonomie, 61(1): 46-66. DOI: 10.18267/j.polek.883 Go to original source...

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC BY NC ND 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.