A MODIFIED EMPIRICAL MODEL FOR ESTIMATING THE WETTED ZONE DIMENSIONS UNDER DRIP IRRIGATION

Authors

  • Ahmed A. M. Al-Ogaidi Dams and Water Resources Eng. Dept., College of Eng., University of Mosul, Mosul, Iraq
  • Aimrun Wayayok Biological and Agricultural Eng. Dept., Faculty of Eng., Universiti Putra Malaysia, Selangor, Malaysia
  • Md Rowshon Kamal Biological and Agricultural Eng. Dept., Faculty of Eng., Universiti Putra Malaysia, Selangor, Malaysia
  • Ahmed Fikri Abdullah Biological and Agricultural Eng. Dept., Faculty of Eng., Universiti Putra Malaysia, Selangor, Malaysia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.11113/jt.v76.5954

Keywords:

Drip irrigation, wetted zone, empirical model, wetted radius, wetted depth

Abstract

Drip irrigation system has become one of the most common irrigation systems especially in arid and semi-arid regions due to its advantages in saving water. One of the most essential considerations in designing these systems is the dimensions of the wetted soil volume under emitters. These dimensions are significant in choosing the proper emitter spacing along the laterals and the suitable distance between laterals. In this study, a modified empirical equations for estimating the horizontal and vertical extend of the wetted zone under surface emitters were suggested. Data from published papers includes different conditions of soil properties and emitter discharge were used in deriving the empirical model using the nonlinear regression. The developed model has high value for coefficient of determination, R2. The results from the developed model were compared with results of other empirical models derived by other researchers. Some statistical criteria were used to evaluate the model performance which are the mean error ME, root mean square error RMSE, and model efficiency EF. The results revealed that the modified model showed good performance in predicting the wetted zone dimensions and it can be used in design and management of drip irrigation systems. 

References

Dasberg, S. and Or, D. 1999. Drip Irrigation. Springer-Verlag, Berlin. 162.

Subbaiah, R. 2013. A Review of Models for Predicting Soil Water Dynamics During Trickle Irrigation. Irrigation Science. 31(3): 225-258.

Thorburn, P. J., Cook, F. J. and Bristow, K. L. 2003. Soil-Dependent Wetting from Trickle Emitters: Implications for System Design and Management. Irrigation Science. 22(3-4): 121-127.

Cook, F. J., Thorburn, P. J., Bristow, K. L. and Cote, C. M. 2003a. Infiltration from Surface and Buried Point Sources: The Average Wetting Water Content. Water Resources Research. 39(12): 1364.

Philip, J. R. 1984. Travel Times from Buried and Surface Infiltration Point Sources. Water Resources Research. 20: 990-994.

Revol, P., Vauclin, M., Vachaud, G. and Clothier, B. E. 1997a. Infiltration from a Surface Point Source and Drip Irrigation 1. The Midpoint Soil Water Pressure. Water Resources Research. 33: 1861-1867.

Revol, P., Clothier, B.E., Mailhol, J.C., Vachaud, G. and Vauclin, M. 1997b. Infiltration from a Surface Point Source and Drip Irrigation 2. An Approximate Time-Dependent Solution for Wet-Front Position. Water Resources Research. 33: 1869-1874.

Cook, F. J., Thorburn, P. J., Fitch, P. and Bristow, K. L. 2003b. WetUp: a Software Tool to Display Approximate Wetting Patterns from Drippers. Irrigation Science. 22: 129-134.

Simunek, J., Sejna, M. and van Genuchten, M. T. 2006. The HYDRUS Software Package for Simulating Two- and Three-Dimensional Movement of Water, Heat, and Multiple Solutes in Variably-Saturated Media. Technical Manual, V. 1.0. PC Progress, Prague.

Schwartzman, M. and Zur, B. 1986. Emitter Spacing And Geometry of Wetted Soil Volume. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering. 112(3): 242-253.

Amin, M. S. M. and Ekhmaj, A. I. M. 2006. DIPAC-drip Irrigation Water Distribution Pattern Calculator. 7th Int. Micro Irrigation Congress, PWTC, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, 10-12.

Malek, K. and Peters, R. T. 2011. Wetting Pattern Models for Drip Irrigation: New Empirical Model. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering. 137(8): 530-536.

Lazarovitch, N., Warrick, A. W., Furman, A. and Šimůnek, J. 2007. Subsurface Water Distribution from Drip Irrigation Described by Moment Analyses. Vadose Zone Journal. 6(1): 116-123.

Samadianfard, S., Sadraddini, A. A., Nazemi, A. H., Provenzano, G. and Kisi, O. 2012. Estimating Soil Wetting Patterns for Drip Irrigation Using Genetic Programming. Spanish Journal of Agricultural Research. 10(4): 1155-1166.

Ekhmaj A. I., Abdulaziz A. M. and Almdny A. M. 2007. Artificial Neural Networks Approach to Estimate Wetting Pattern Under Point Source Trickle Irrigation. African Crop Science Conference. 8: 1625-1630.

Saito, H. and Kitahara, M. 2012. Analysis of Changes in Soil Water Content under Subsurface Drip Irrigation Using Ground Penetrating Radar. Journal of Arid Land Studies. 22(1): 283-286.

Gil-Rodríguez, M., Rodríguez-Sinobas, L., Benítez-Buelga, J. and Sánchez-Calvo, R. 2013. Application of Active Heat Pulse Method with Fiber Optic Temperature Sensing for Estimation of Wetting Bulbs and Water Distribution in Drip Emitters. Agricultural Water Management. 120: 72-78.

Taghavi, S., Mariño, M. and Rolston, D. 1984. Infiltration from Trickle Irrigation Source. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering. 110(4): 331-341.

Angelakis, A. N., Kadir T. N. and Rolston, D. E. 1993. Time-Dependent Soil-Water Distribution under a Circular Trickle Source. Water Resources Management. 7(3): 225-235.

Hammami, M., Hedi, D., Jelloul, B. and Mohamed, M. 2002. Approach for Predicting the Wetting Front Depth Beneath a Surface Point Source : Theory and Numerical Aspect. Irrigation and Drainage. 51(4): 347-360.

Li, J., Zhang, J. and Ren, L. 2003. Water and Nitrogen Distribution as Affected by Fertigation of Ammonium Nitrate from a Point Source. Irrigation Science. 22(1): 19-30.

Li, J., Zhang, J. and Rao, M. 2004. Wetting Patterns and Nitrogen Distributions as Affected by Fertigation Strategies from a Surface Point Source. Agricultural Water Management. 67(2): 89-104.

Willmut, C. J. 1982. Some Comments on the Evaluation of Model Performance. Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc. 63(11): 1309-1313.

Kandelous, M. M. and Šimůnek, J. 2010. Comparison of numerical, Analytical, and Empirical Models to Estimate Wetting Patterns for Surface and Subsurface Drip Irrigation. Irrigation Science. 28(5): 435-444.

Downloads

Published

2015-10-25

How to Cite

A MODIFIED EMPIRICAL MODEL FOR ESTIMATING THE WETTED ZONE DIMENSIONS UNDER DRIP IRRIGATION. (2015). Jurnal Teknologi, 76(15). https://doi.org/10.11113/jt.v76.5954