Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-m9kch Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-01T16:09:06.491Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Crimmigration in the Netherlands

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 December 2018

Abstract

For a long time the Netherlands has been internationally known for its tolerant and humane environment for first‐ and second‐generation migrants. However, as in many European countries, over the past few decades the political debate on immigration has gradually grown more negative. Links between crime, security, migration, and integration have become more established, resulting in a series of policy and legislative reforms targeting migrants in the country. These developments seem to fit into the broader trend for which scholars have coined the term crimmigration, the intersection of crime control and immigration control. In this article, using crimmigration as a sensitizing concept, we seek to gain insight into the governance of migration and crime in Netherlands.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © American Bar Foundation, 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References

Aas, Katja Franko 2011. Crimmigrant Bodies and Bona Fide Travelers: Surveillance, Citizenship and Governance. Theoretical Criminology 15 (3): 331346.Google Scholar
Aas, Katja Franko 2013. The Ordered and the Bordered Society: Migration Control, Citizenship and the Northern Penal State. In The Borders of Punishment. Migration, Citizenship, and Social Exclusion, ed. Aas, Katja F. and Bosworth, Mary, 2139. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Adviescommissie voor Vreemdelingenzaken. 2012. Recht op Menswaardig Bestaan: Advies over Opvang en Bijstand voor niet Rechtmatig Verblijvende Vreemdelingen en Rechtmatig Verblijvende Vreemdelingen zonder Recht op Voorzieningen. The Hague: Adviescommissie voor Vreemdelingenzaken.Google Scholar
Amnesty International. 2008. The Netherlands: The Detention of Irregular Immigrants and Asylum‐Seekers. EUR 35/02/2008. Amsterdam: Amnesty International.Google Scholar
Amnesty International. 2011. Netherlands: Protecting Human Rights at Home. Submission to the UN Universal Periodic Review, May–June 2012. EUR 35/001/2011. Amsterdam: Amnesty International.Google Scholar
Bakker, Maartje 2012. Teeven over Illegaliteit: Wie Geen Boete Kan Betalen Krijgt Hechtenis. De Volkskrant, December 22. www.volkskrant.nl/vk/nl/11698/Kabinet‐Rutte‐II/article/detail/3367704/2012/12/22/Teeven‐over‐illegaliteit‐Wie‐geen‐boete‐kan‐betalen‐krijgt‐hechtenis.dhtml (accessed November 18, 2013).Google Scholar
Barker, Vanessa 2012. Global Mobility and Penal Order: Criminalizing Migration, A View from Europe. Sociology Compass 6 (2): 113121.Google Scholar
Bigo, Didier 2005. Frontier Controls in the European Union: Who Is in Control? In Controlling Frontiers: Free Movement Into and Within Europe, ed. Bigo, Didier and Guild, Elspeth, 4588. Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Blad, John R. 1992. Selected Issues on Crime and Punishment in the Netherlands. Unpublished Paper, Erasmus University, Rotterdam.Google Scholar
Blumer, H. 1954. What Is Wrong with Social Theory. American Sociological Review 18:310.Google Scholar
Bosworth, Mary, and Guild, Mhairi 2008. Governing Through Migration Control: Security and Citizenship in Britain. British Journal of Criminology 48:703719.Google Scholar
Bourbeau, P. 2011. The Securitization of Migration: A Study of Movement and Order. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Broeders, Dennis 2009. Return to Sender? Administrative Detention of Irregular Migrants in Germany and the Netherlands. Punishment and Society 12:169186.Google Scholar
Cavadino, Michael, and Dignan, James 2006. Penal Systems: A Comparative Approach. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Central Bureau of Statistics. 2012. CBS Statline: Bevolking. The Hague: Statistics Netherlands. www.cbs.nl (accessed November 18, 2013).Google Scholar
Chacón, Jennifer M. 2012. Overcriminalizing Immigration. Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology 102 (3): 613652.Google Scholar
Cohn, Marjorie 2012. Immigration, Racism, and the Supreme Court. www.marjoriecohn.com/2012/07/immigration‐racism‐and‐supreme‐court.html (accessed July 18, 2012).Google Scholar
Commissie Roethof. 1984. Interim‐rapport Commissie Kleine Criminaliteit. The Hague: Staatsuitgeverij.Google Scholar
de Giorgi, Alessandro 2006. Re‐Thinking the Political Economy of Punishment: Perspectives on Post‐Fordism and Penal Politics. Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Downes, David, and van Swaaningen, René 2007. The Road to Dystopia; Changes in the Penal Climate in the Netherlands. In Crime and Justice in the Netherlands, ed. Tonry, Michael and Bijleveld, Catrien J., 3172. Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
Eagly, Ingrid V. 2010. Prosecuting Immigration. Northwestern University Law Review 104:12811292.Google Scholar
Engbersen, Godfried, van der Leun, Joanne P., and de Boom, Jan 2007. The Fragmentation of Migration and Crime in the Netherlands. In Crime and Justice in the Netherlands, ed. Tonry, Michael and Bijleveld, Catrien J., 389452. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Entzinger, Han 2003. The Rise and Fall of Multiculturalism: The Case of the Netherlands. In Toward Assimilation and Citizenship: Immigrants in Liberal Nation‐States, ed. Joppke, C. and Morawska, E., 5986. Hampshire, UK: Palgrave.Google Scholar
Fionda, Julia 1995. Public Prosecutors and Discretion: A Comparative Study. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Fortuyn, Pim. 1997. De Islamisering van Onze Cultuur. Nederlandse Identiteit als Fundament. Rotterdam: Karakter/Speakers Academy.Google Scholar
Fortuyn, Pim. 2002. De puinhopen van Acht Jaar Paars. Uithoorn: Karakter Uitgevers.Google Scholar
Garland, David 2001. The Culture of Control. Crime and Social Order in Contemporary Society. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Geddes, Andrew 2003. The Politics of Migration and Integration in Europe. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Glaser, Barney G. 1978. Theoretical Sensitivity: Advances in the Methodology of Grounded Theory. Mill Valley, CA: Sociology Press.Google Scholar
Guia, Maria J. 2013. Crimmigration, Securitisation and the Criminal Law of the Crimmigrant. In Social Control and Justice: Crimmigration in the Age of Fear, ed. Guia, M. J., van der Woude, M. A. H., and van der Leun, J. P., 1740. The Hague: Eleven International.Google Scholar
Hartry, Allison S. 2012. Commentary Gendering Crimmigration: The Intersection of Gender, Immigration, and the Criminal Justice System. Berkeley Journal of Gender, Law & Justice 2 (8): 127.Google Scholar
Huysmans, Jef 2000. The European Union and the Securitization of Migration. JCMS 38 (5): 751777.Google Scholar
Huysmans, Jef 2006. The Politics of Insecurity: Fear, Migration and Asylum in the EU. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Jennissen, Roel 2009. Criminaliteit, Leeftijd en Etniciteit. The Hague: Ministry of Security and Justice/WODC.Google Scholar
Judicial Institutions Service. 2011. Vreemdelingenbewaring in Getal 2006–2010. The Hague: Judicial Institutions Service.Google Scholar
Judicial Institutions Service. 2012. Vreemdelingenbewaring in Getal 2007–2011. The Hague: Judicial Institutions Service.Google Scholar
Junger‐Tas, Josine, Haen Marshall, Ineke, Enzmann, Dirk, Killias, Martin, Steketee, Majone, and Grusczynka, Beata 2011. The Many Faces of Youth Crime. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
Justitia et Pax Nederland. 2010. Humaniteit in Vreemdelingenbewaring. Ervaringen van het Rooms‐Katholieke Justitiepastoraat. The Hague: Justitia et Pax Nederland.Google Scholar
Kanstroom, Daniel 2000. Deportation, Social Control, and Punishment: Some Thoughts About Why Hard Laws Make Bad Cases. Boston College Law School Journal 113:18901935.Google Scholar
Kanstroom, Daniel 2004. Criminalizing the Undocumented: Ironic Boundaries of the Post‐September 11th “Pale of Law.” Boston College Law School Journal 29:639670.Google Scholar
Killias, Martin 2011. Immigration and Crime: The European Experience. Florence: European University Institute.Google Scholar
Koemans, Monique 2011. The War on Anti‐Social Behaviour. PhD diss., Leiden Law School, Netherlands.Google Scholar
Laagland, D. C., van der Leun, J. P., van der Meij, P. P. J., and Leerkes, A. S. 2009. Het Strafrecht als Vicieus Sluitstuk van Beleid ten Aanzien van Criminele Vreemdelingen: Het Sluimerende Probleem van de Niet‐uitzetbare Ongewenst Verklaarde Vreemdeling. Delikt en Delinkwent 39 (7): 697724.Google Scholar
Lappi‐Seppälä, Tapio 2007. Penal Policy in Scandinavia. In Crime and Justice: Crime, Punishment and Politics in Comparative Perspective, ed. Tonry, Michael, 217296. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Lappi‐Seppälä, Tapio 2008. Trust, Welfare and Political Culture: Explaining Differences in National Penal Policies. In Crime and Justice, ed. Tonry, Michael, 318387. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Leerkes, Arjen S., and Broeders, Dennis 2010. A Case of Mixed Motives? Formal and Informal Functions of Administrative Immigration Detention. British Journal of Criminology 50:121.Google Scholar
Leerkes, Arjen S., Engbersen, Godfried, and van der Leun, Joanne P. 2012. Crime Among Irregular Immigrants and the Influence of Internal Border Control. Crime, Law and Social Change 58 (1): 1538.Google Scholar
Legomsky, Stephen H. 2007. The New Path of Immigration Law: Asymmetric Incorporation of Criminal Justice Norms. Washington & Lee Law Review 64:469528.Google Scholar
Lunshof, Kees 2004. Van Polderen naar Polariseren. Amsterdam: Uitgeverij Bert Bakker.Google Scholar
Miller, Teresa A. 2003. Citizenship & Severity: Recent Immigration Reforms and the New Penology. Georgetown Immigration Law Journal 17:611666.Google Scholar
Miller, Teresa A. 2005. Blurring the Boundaries Between Immigration and Crime Control After September 11th. Boston College Third World Law Journal 25 (1): 81123.Google Scholar
Ministry of Alien Affairs and Integration. 2003. Terugkeernota: Maatregelen voor een effectievere uitvoering van het terugkeerbeleid [Return Memorandum. Measures for an Effective Execution of the Return Policy], TK. vergaderjaar 2003. 2003–2004: 29 344, nr.1.Google Scholar
Ministry of Justice. 1985. Samenleving en Criminaliteit: Een Beleidsplan voor de Komende Jaren. The Hague: Ministry of Justice.Google Scholar
Ministry of Justice. 1990. Law in Motion: A Policy Plan for Justice in the Years Ahead. The Hague: Ministry of Justice.Google Scholar
Ministry of Security and Justice. 2012. Alien Detention Rates 2007–2011. The Hague: Ministry of Security and Justice.Google Scholar
Mitsilegas, Valsamis 2013. The Changing Landscape of the Criminalization of Migration in Europe. In Social Control and Justice: Crimmigration in the Age of Fear, ed. Guia, Maria J., van der Woude, Maartje A. H., and van der Leun, Joanne P., 87114. The Hague: Eleven International.Google Scholar
National Ombudsman. 2012. Vreemdelingenbewaring: Strafregime of Maatregel om uit te Zetten. Over Respect voor Mensenrechten bij Vreemdelingenbewaring. The Hague: National Ombudsman.Google Scholar
National Ombudsman. 2013. Complaint of June 20, 2013, Report 2013/069. The Hague: National OmbudsmanGoogle Scholar
Noll, Gregor 1999. Rejected Asylum Seekers: The Problem of Return. International Migration 37:267288.Google Scholar
Padgett, D. K. 2004. Coming of Age: Theoretical Thinking, Social Responsibility, and a Global Perspective in Qualitative Research. In The Qualitative Research Experience, ed. Padgett, D. K., 297315. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth/Thomson Learning.Google Scholar
Pakes, Francis 2004. The Politics of Discontent: The Emergence of a New Criminal Justice Discourse in the Netherlands. Howard Journal of Criminal Justice 43 (3): 284298.Google Scholar
Pakes, Francis 2006. The Ebb and Flow of Criminal Justice in the Netherlands. International Journal of the Sociology of Law 34:141156.Google Scholar
Parliamentary Papers 2011–2012, 19637, nr. 1494.Google Scholar
Parliamentary Papers 2012–2013, 33 512, nr. 3 [explanatory memorandum].Google Scholar
Provine, Doris M., and Doty, Roxanne L. D. 2011. The Criminalization of Immigrants as a Racial Project. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice 27 (3): 261277.Google Scholar
Raad voor Strafrechtstoepassing en Jeugdbescherming. 2008. Advies Vreemdelingenbewaring. www.narcis.nl/publication/RecordID/oai:wo.uvt.nl:304150 (accessed November 18, 2013).Google Scholar
Rijken, C. R. J. J., and de Volder, E. J. A. 2010. The European Union's Struggle to Realize a Human Rights‐based Approach to Trafficking in Human Beings: A Call on the EU to Take THB‐Sensitive Action in Relevant Areas of Law. Connecticut Journal of International Law 25 (49): 4980.Google Scholar
Rutherford, Andrew 1996. Transforming Criminal Policy. Winchester: Waterside Press.Google Scholar
Scheffer, Paul 2000. Het Multicultureel Drama, NRC Handelsblad, January 29. retro.nrc.nl/W2/Lab/Multicultureel/scheffer.html (accessed November 18, 2013).Google Scholar
Scholten, Peter W. A. 2007. Constructing Immigrant Policies: Research‐Policy Relations and Immigrant Integration in the Netherlands, 1970–2004. PhD diss., University of Twente, Netherlands.Google Scholar
Simon, Jonathan 2007. Governing Through Crime: How the War on Crime Transformed American Democracy and Created a Culture of Fear. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Siskin, Alison 2012. Immigration‐Related Detention: Current Legislative Issues. Washington, DC: Congressional Research Service.Google Scholar
Sklansky, David A. 2012. Crime, Immigration and Ad Hoc Instrumentalism. New Criminal Law Review 15:157223.Google Scholar
Sociaal Cultureel Planbureau [The Netherlands Institute for Social Research]. 2011. De sociale staat van Nederland 2011. Den Haag: SCP Google Scholar
Stumpf, Juliet. P. 2006. The Crimmigration Crisis: Immigrants, Crime, and Sovereign Power. American University Law Review 56:367419.Google Scholar
Stumpf, Juliet. P. 2008. States of Confusion: The Rise of State and Local Power Over Immigration. North Carolina Law Review 86:15571618.Google Scholar
Stumpf, Juliet. P. 2011. Doing Time: Crimmigration Law and the Perils of Haste. UCLA Law Review 58:17051748.Google Scholar
Timmermans, Sebastiaan 2012. Rutte Wil Ook in Kamer Niet op ‘Polen‐meldpunt’ Reageren. De Volkskrant, February 14. www.volkskrant.nl/vk/nl/2824/Politiek/article/detail/3178842/2012/02/14/Rutte‐wil‐ook‐in‐Kamer‐niet‐op‐Polen‐meldpunt‐reageren.dhtml (accessed on November 18, 2013).Google Scholar
Tonry, Michael, ed. 1997. Ethnicity, Crime, and Immigration: Comparative and Cross‐National Perspectives. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
van der Laan, Servaas 2013. Meeste Nederlanders voor Strafbaarstelling Illegaliteit. Elsevier, May 5. www.elsevier.nl/Politiek/nieuws/2013/5/Meeste‐Nederlanders‐voor‐strafbaarstelling‐illegaliteit‐1247753W/ (accessed November 18, 2013).Google Scholar
van der Leun, Joanne P. 2003. Looking for Loopholes: Processes of Incorporation of Illegal Immigrants in the Netherlands. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.Google Scholar
van der Leun, Joanne P. 2006. Excluding Illegal Migrants in the Netherlands: Between National Policies and Local Implementation. West European Politics 29 (2): 310326.Google Scholar
van der Leun, Joanne P. 2010. Crimmigratie. Apeldoorn‐Antwerpen: Maklu‐Uitgevers.Google Scholar
van der Leun, Joanne P., and Ilies, Maria 2012. Undocumented Migration: An Exploratory Framework. In European Perspectives. An Introduction to International Migration Studies (IMISCOE Textbooks), 305328. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.Google Scholar
van der Leun, Joanne P., and Kloosterman, Robert C. 2006. Going Underground: The Labour Market Position of Undocumented Immigrants in the Netherlands. Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie 97 (1): 5968.Google Scholar
van der Leun, Joanne P., and van der Woude, Maartje A. H. 2011. Ethnic Profiling in the Netherlands? A Reflection on Expanding Preventive Powers, Ethnic Profiling and a Changing Social and Political Context. Policing & Society 21 (4): 444455.Google Scholar
van der Leun, Joanne P., and van der Woude, Maartje A. H. 2013. A Reflection on Crimmigration in the Netherlands: On the Cultural Security Complex and the Impact of Framing. In Social Control and Justice: Crimmigration in the Age of Fear, ed. Guia, Maria J., van der Woude, Maartje A. H., and van der Leun, Joanne P., 4160. The Hague: Eleven International.Google Scholar
van der Woude, Maartje A. H. 2010. Wetgeving in een Veiligheidscultuur: De Totstandkoming van Antiterrorismewetgeving in Nederland Bezien Vanuit Maatschappelijke en (Rechts)politieke Context. The Hague: Boom Juridische Uitgevers.Google Scholar
van Meeteren, Masja 2012. Living Different Dreams: Aspirations and Social Activities of Irregular Migrants in the Low Countries. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 38 (10): 16431659.Google Scholar
van Praag, Philip 2003. The Winners and Losers in a Turbulent Political Year. Acta Politica 38 (1): 522.Google Scholar
van Swaaningen, René 1996. Justitie als Verzekeringsmaatschappij [Actuarial Justice in Nederlands]. Justitiele Verkenningen 5:8097.Google Scholar
van Swaaningen, René 2005. Public Safety and the Management of Fear. Theoretical Criminology 9 (3): 289305.Google Scholar
Wansink, Hans A. 2004. De Erfenis van Fortuyn: De Nederlandse Democratie na de Opstand van de Kierzers. Amsterdam: Meulenhoff.Google Scholar
Wetenschappelijke Raad voor het Regeringsbeleid (WRR). 1979. Etnische Minderheden. The Hague: Sdu Uitgevers.Google Scholar
Wetenschappelijke Raad voor het Regeringsbeleid (WRR). 2007. In Debat over Nederland. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.Google Scholar

Cases Cited

El Dridi, Court of Justice of the European Union, Case C‐61/11 PPU, April 28, 2011.Google Scholar
Kadzoev, Court of Justice of the European Union, Case C‐357/09 PPU, November 30, 2009.Google Scholar
Md Sagor, Court of Justice of the European Union, Case C‐430/11, December 6, 2012.Google Scholar

Statutes Cited

European Union Returns Directive 2008, 2008/115/EC, December 16, 2008.Google Scholar
Netherlands Alien Act 2000.Google Scholar
Netherlands Alien Circular 2000.Google Scholar
Netherlands Alien Decree 2000, April 1, 2001.Google Scholar
Netherlands Alien Decree 2002, July 17, 2002.Google Scholar
Netherlands Alien Decree 2012, July 1, 2012.Google Scholar
Netherlands Bill of December 15, 2011 changing the Alien Act 2000, by implementation of Directive nr. 2008/115/EG of the European Parliament and the Council of December 16, 2008. Stb., 2011, 30 December 2011.Google Scholar
Netherlands Bill of July 11, 2011, changing the Alien Act 2000 with regard to the criminalization of illegal stay, Parliamentary Papers 2010–2011, 19637, nr. 1436Google Scholar
Netherlands Criminal Code of March 3 1881Art. 231 (fraud with travel documents).Google Scholar