Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Brief report: Trainee provider perceptions of group visits

  • Original Articles
  • Published:
Journal of General Internal Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect of observing group visits on trainees’ perceptions of group visits as a method of health care delivery.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Thirty-two trainees assigned to month-long rotations at an academic Internal Medicine Primary Care Clinic serving underinsured patients were recruited to observe between 1 and 4 group visits. Prior to observation of their first, and subsequent to observation of their last group visit, each trainee completed the Patient-Physician Orientation Scale (PPOS), a validated survey evaluating their tendencies toward being patient-centered or provider-centered. Additionally, they completed a Group Visit Questionnaire (GVQ) evaluating their perceptions of group visits as a method of health care delivery.

RESULTS: Trainee gender, type, and level of training were similarly represented across the study population of trainees. While there were no significant differences noted on pre- and postobservation PPOS scores, the postobservation GVQs scores were significantly improved after observing at least one group visit (P<.0001).

CONCLUSION: Trainees’ perceptions of group visits as a method of health care delivery improved significantly after observation of at least 1 group as measured by the GVQ.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  1. Mechanic D, McAlpine DD, Rosenthal M. Are patients’ office visits with physicians getting shorter? N Engl J Med. 2001;244:198–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Blendon RJ, Schoen C, Donelan K, et al. Physicians’ view on quality of care: a five-country comparison. Health Affairs. 2001;20:233–43.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Lin CT, Albertson GA, Schilling LM, et al. Is patients’ perception of time spent with a physician a determinant of ambulatory patient satisfaction? Arch Intern Med. 2001;161:1437–42.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Beck A, Scott J, Williams C, et al. A randomized trial of group outpatient visits for chronically ill HMO members: the cooperative health care clinic. JAGS. 1997;45:543–9.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Clancy DE, Cope DW, Magruder KM, et al. Evaluating concordance to American Diabetes Association standards of care for type 2 diabetes through group visits in an uninsured or inadequately insured patient population. Diab Care. 2003;26:2032–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Trento M, Passera P, Borga E, et al. A 5-year randomized controlled study of learning, problem solving, and quality of life modifications in people with type 2 diabetes managed in group care. Diab Care. 2004;27:670–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Noffsinger EB. Benefits of Drop-In Group Medical Appointments (DIG-MAs) to physicians and patients. Group Pract J. 1999;48:21–8.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Krupat E, Rosenkranz SL, Yeager CM, et al. The practice orientation of physicians and patients: the effect of doctor-patient congruence on satisfaction. Patient Educ Coun. 2000;39:49–59.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kimberly S. Davis MD.

Additional information

The authors have no conflicts of interest to report.

This project was supported by grant number 5 P01 HS10871 from the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality and by a grant from The Robert Wood Johnson Foundation, Princeton, NJ.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Davis, K.S., Magruder, K.M., Lin, Y. et al. Brief report: Trainee provider perceptions of group visits. J Gen Intern Med 21, 357–359 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1525-1497.2006.00350.x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1525-1497.2006.00350.x

Key words

Navigation