Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Black-white differences in risk perceptions of breast cancer survival and screening mammography benefit

  • Populations At Risk
  • Published:
Journal of General Internal Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Given differences in cancer survival by race, black women may differ from white women in breast cancer risk perceptions.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate black-white differences in risk perceptions of breast cancer survival and screening mammography benefit.

DESIGN: A written survey was administered to a random sample of women attending general internal medicine clinics.

PARTICIPANTS: Black and white women, ages 40 to 69.

MEASUREMENTS: Risk perceptions were measured regarding (1) average 5-year survival after a breast cancer diagnosis and (2) relative risk reduction of screening mammography. Women’s risk perceptions were defined as being accurate, as well as more or less pessimistic. Measured patient characteristics included race, age, family history of breast cancer, income, insurance, education, and numeracy. Unadjusted Pearson x 2 tests and adjusted multivariable regression analyses were done.

RESULTS: Black women were more likely than white women to accurately perceive breast cancer survival in both unadjusted (48% vs 26%, P<.001) and adjusted analyses (adjusted odds ratio (AOR)=3.58; 95% confidence interval (CI)=1.56 to 8.21). Black women were also more likely to accurately perceive the benefit of screening mammography in unadjusted (39% vs 15%, P<.001) and adjusted analyses (AOR=2.70; 95% CI=1.09 to 6.69). Black women were more likely to have a more pessimistic perception of mammography benefit in unadjusted (47% vs 15%, P<.0001) and adjusted analyses (AOR=3.94; 95% CI=1.62 to 9.56).

CONCLUSIONS: Awareness of risk perceptions can help physicians to tailor patient education. Physician acknowledgment of more accurate risk perceptions among black women may serve as a basis to improve patient-physician communication.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Fischhoff B. Why (cancer) risk communication can be hard. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr. 1999;25:7–13.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Cull A, Anderson ED, Campbell S, Mackay J, Smyth E, Steel M. The impact of genetic counselling about breast cancer risk on women’s risk perceptions and levels of distress. Br J Cancer. Feb 1999;79:501–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Woloshin S, Schwartz LM, Black WC, Welch HG. Women’s perceptions of breast cancer risk: how you ask matters. Med Decis Making. 1999;19:221–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Ayanian JZ, Cleary PD, Weissman JS, Epstein AM. The effect of patients’ preferences on racial differences in access to renal transplantation. N Engl J Med. 1999;341:1661–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Ojo AO, Port FK, Wolfe RA, et al. Comparative mortality risks of chronic dialysis and cadaveric transplantation in black end-stage renal disease patients. Am J Kidney Dis. 1994;24:59–64.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Lannin DR, Mathews HF, Mitchell J, Swanson MS, Swanson FH, Edwards MS. Influence of socioeconomic and cultural factors on racial differences in late-stage presentation of breast cancer. JAMA. 1998;279:1801–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Phillips JM, Cohen MZ, Moses G. Breast cancer screening and African American women: fear, fatalism, and silence. Oncol Nurs Forum. 1999;26:561–71.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Powe BD. Cancer fatalism among Blacks: a review of the literature. Nurs Outlook. 1996;44:18–21.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Boulware LE, Cooper LA, Ratner LE, LaVeist TA, Powe NR. Race and trust in the health care system. Public Health Rep. 2003;118:358–65.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. U.S. Preventive Services Task Force Screening for Breast Cancer. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; 1996 Available at: http://www.ahrq.gov/clinic/2ndcps/brstcan.pdf. Accessed January 10, 2005.

  11. Schwartz LM, Woloshin S, Black WC, Welch HG. The role of numeracy in understanding the benefit of screening mammography. Ann Intern Med. 1997;127:966–72.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Greenlee RT, Hill-Harmon MB, Murray T, Thun M. Cancer statistics, 2001. CA Cancer J Clin. 2001;51:15–36.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Kerlikowske K, Grady D, Rubin SM, Sandrock C, Ernster VL. Efficacy of screening mammography. A meta-analysis. JAMA. 1995;273:149–54.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Smith BL, Gadd MA, Lawler C, et al. Perception of breast cancer risk among women in breast center and primary care settings: correlation with age and family history of breast cancer. Surgery. 1996;120:297–303.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Black WC, Nease RF Jr., Tosteson AN. Perceptions of breast cancer risk and screening effectiveness in women younger than 50 years of age. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1995;87:720–31.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Lerman C, Lustbader E, Rimer B, et al. Effects of individualized breast cancer risk counseling: a randomized trial. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1995;87:286–92.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Davids SL, Schapira MM, McAuliffe TL, Nattinger AB. Predictors of pessimistic breast cancer risk perceptions in a primary care population. J Gen Intern Med. 2004;19:310–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Jemal A, Murray T, Samuels A, Ghafoor A, Ward E, Thun MJ. Cancer statistics, 2003. CA Cancer J Clin. 2003;53:5–26.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. McKinnon Jesse. The Black Population in the United States: March 2002. Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau Current Population Reports, Series P20-541. 2003. Available at: http://www.census.gov/prod/2003pubs/p20-541.pdf. Accessed October 17, 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  20. U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Screening for Breast Cancer: Recommendations and Rationale. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. February 2002. Available at: http://www.ahrq.gov/clinic/3rduspstf/breastcancer/brcanrr.htm. Accessed February 15, 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Woloshin S, Schwartz LM, Welch HG. Risk charts: putting cancer in context. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2002;94:799–804.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David A. Haggstrom MD, MCR.

Additional information

The authors have no conflicts of interest to report.

Dr. Haggstrom was supported by the VA Ambulatory Care Fellowship and Health Resources and Services Administration Faculty Development Grant (1D14 HP001 78-01). Dr. Schapira was supported by the American Cancer Society Cancer Control Career Development Award.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Haggstrom, D.A., Schapira, M.M. Black-white differences in risk perceptions of breast cancer survival and screening mammography benefit. J Gen Intern Med 21, 371–377 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1525-1497.2006.00347.x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1525-1497.2006.00347.x

Key words

Navigation