Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Patient contribution to the medical dialogue and perceived patient-centeredness

An observational study in Japanese geriatric consultations

  • Original Articles
  • Published:
Journal of General Internal Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Relatively few studies have directly addressed the interaction dynamics and consequences of a companion’s presence in the medical visit, and their findings have been contradictory.

OBJECTIVES: To examine how patient’s contribution to the medical dialogue, with or without the presence of a visit companion, is related to the perception of the medical visit as patient-centered.

DESIGN: Observational study using pre- and postvisit questionnaires and audiotape recording of medical visits.

PARTICIPANTS: One hundred and fifty-five patients aged 65 or over; 63 in medical visits that included the presence of a companion and 82 in visits that did not include a companion.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Patient ratings of visit patient-centeredness.

RESULTS: Long visits (greater than 10 minutes long) and visits in which patients were verbally active were rated as more patient-centered by patients than other visits. Since patients were generally less verbally active in visits that included a companion, accompanied visits, especially if they were less than 10 minutes long, received lower patient-centered ratings than others. The presence of a companion was not related to length of the visit, suggesting that the verbal activity of the companion was off-set by decreased verbal activity of the patient.

CONCLUSIONS: Our results have suggested that patients are more likely to perceive their physician and visit as patient-centered when they have an opportunity to engage directly in the medical dialogue. A minimal amount of “talk-time” for patients themselves should be safe-guarded even in a short visit, when a companion is present.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Little P, Everitt H, Williamson I, et al. Observational study of effect of patient centredness and positive approach on outcomes of general practice consultations. BMJ. 2001;323:908–11.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Mead N, Bower P. Patient-centred consultations and outcomes in primary care: a review of the literature. Patient Educ Couns. 2002;48:51–61.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Stewart MA. Effective physician-patient communication and health outcomes: a review. CMAJ. 1995;152:1423–33.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Stewart M, Brown JB, Donner A, et al. The impact of patient-centered care on outcomes. J Fam Pract. 2000;49:796–804.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Stewart M, Brown JB, Weston WW, McWhinney IR, McWilliam CL, Freeman TR. Patient-Centered Medicine: TRANSFORMING the Clinical Method. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications; 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Adelman RD, Greene MG, Charon R. The physician-elderly patient-companion triad in the medical encounter: the development of a conceptual framework and research agenda. Gerontologist. 1987;27:729–34.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Beisecker AE. The influence of a companion on the doctor-elderly patient interaction. Health Commun. 1989;1:55–70.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Brown JB, Brett P, Stewart M, Marshall JN. Roles and influence of people who accompany patients on visits to the doctor. Can Fam Physician. 1998;44:1644–50.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Prohaska TR, Glasser M. Patients’ views of family involvement in medical care decisions and encounters. Res Aging. 1996;18:52–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Clayman ML, Roter D, issow LS, Bandeen-Roche K. Autonomy-related behaviors of patient companions and their effect on decision-making activity in geriatric primary care visits. Soc Sci Med. 2005;60:1583–91.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Ishikawa H, Roter DL, Yamazaki Y, Takayama T. Physician-elderly patient-companion communication in Japanese geriatric encounters. Soc Sci Med. 2005;60:2307–20.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Schilling LM, Scatena L, Steiner JF, Albertson GA, Lin CT, Cyran L, et al. The third person in the room: frequency, role, and influence of companions during primary care medical encounters. J Fam Pract. 2002;51:685–90.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Labrecque MS, Blanchard CG, Ruckdeschel JC, Blanchard EB. The impact of family presence on the physician-cancer patient interaction. Soc Sci Med. 1991;33:1253–61.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Botelho RJ, Lue BH, Fiscella K. Family involvement in routine health care: a survey of patients’ behaviors and preferences. J Fam Pract. 1996;42:572–6.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Baker PS, Yoels WC, Clair JM, Allman RM. Laughter in triadic geriatric medical encounters: a transcript-based analysis. Social Perspectives Emotion. 1997;4:179–207.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Coe RM, Prendergast RM. Research note: the formation of coalitions: interaction strategies in triads. Sociol Health Illness. 1985;7:237–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Greene MG, Adelman RD, Friedmann E, Charon R. Older patient satisfaction with communication during an initial medical encounter. Soc Sci Med. 1994;38:1279–88.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Fukuhara S, Bito S, Green J, Hsiao A, Kurokawa K. Translation, adaptation, and validation of the SF-36 Health Survey for use in Japan. J Clin Epidemiol. 1998;51:1037–44.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Ishikawa H, Takayama T, Yamazaki Y, Seki Y, Katsumata N. Physician-patient communication and patient satisfaction in Japanese cancer consultations. Soc Sci Med. 2002;55:301–11.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Wissow LS, Roter D, Larson SM, et al. Mechanisms behind the failure of residents’ longitudinal primary care to promote disclosure and discussion of psychosocial issues. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2002;156:685–92.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Zeger SL, Liang KY. Longitudinal data analysis for discrete and continuous outcomes. Biometrics. 1986;42:121–30.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Greenfield S, Kaplan S, Ware JE, Jr. Expanding patient involvement in care. Effects on patient outcomes. Ann Intern Med. 1985;102:520–8.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Mead N, Bower P, Hann M. The impact of general practitioners’ patient-centredness on patients’ post-consultation satisfaction and enablement. Soc Sci Med. 2002;55:283–99.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Wolf KH. The Sociology of Georg Simmel. New York: Free Press; 1950.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Haug MR, Ory MG. Issues in elderly patient-provider interactions. Res Aging. 1987;9:3–44.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Stoeckle JD. Encounters Between Patients and Doctors. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press; 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Coe RM, Prendergast CG, Psathas G. Strategies for obtaining compliance with medications regimens. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1984;32:589–94.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Ishikawa H, Roter DL, Yamazaki Y, Hashimoto H, Yano E. Patient perceptions of companion helpfulness during geriatric medical visits. Patient Educ Couns (forthcoming).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hirono Ishikawa PhD.

Additional information

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare for this article or this research.

This research was supported by a grant from the Pfizer health research foundation.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ishikawa, H., Hashimoto, H., Roter, D.L. et al. Patient contribution to the medical dialogue and perceived patient-centeredness. J GEN INTERN MED 20, 906–910 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1525-1497.2005.0200.x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1525-1497.2005.0200.x

Keywords

Navigation