Skip to main content
Log in

Use of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin receptor blockers in high-risk clinical and ethnic groups with diabetes

  • Original Articles
  • Published:
Journal of General Internal Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Diabetes causes 45% of incident end-stage renal disease (ESRD). Risk of progression is higher in those with clinical risk factors (albuminuria and hypertension), and in ethnic minorities (including blacks, Asians, and Latinos). Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACE) and angiotensin receptor blockers (ARB) slow the progression of diabetic nephropathy, yet little is known about their use among patients at high risk for progression to ESRD.

OBJECTIVES: To examine the prevalence of ACE or ARB (ACE/ARB) use overall and within patients with high-risk clinical indications, and to assess for ethnic disparities in ACE/ARB use.

DESIGN: Observational cohort study.

SETTING: Kaiser Permanente Northern California (KPNC) Diabetes Registry, a longitudinal registry that monitors quality and outcomes of care for all KPNC patients with diabetes.

PATIENTS: Individuals (N=38,887) with diabetes who were continuously enrolled with pharmacy benefits during the year 2000, and had self-reported ethnicity data on survey.

INTERVENTIONS AND MEASUREMENTS: Pharmacy dispensing of ACE/ARB.

RESULTS: Forty-one percent of the cohort had both hypertension and albuminuria, 30% had hypertension alone, and 12% had albuminuria alone. Fourteen percent were black, 11% Latino, 13% Asian, and 63% non-Latino white. Overall, 61% of the cohort received an ACE/ARB. ACE/ARB was dispensed to 74% of patients with both hypertension and albuminuria, 64% of those with hypertension alone, and 54% of those with albuminuria alone. ACE/ARB was dispensed to 61% of whites, 63% of blacks, 59% of Latinos, and 60% of Asians. Among those with albuminuria alone, blacks were significantly (P=.0002) less likely than whites to receive ACE/ARB (47% vs 56%, respectively). No other ethnic disparities were found.

CONCLUSIONS: In this cohort, the majority of eligible patients received indicated ACE/ARB therapy in 2000. However, up to 45% to 55% of high-risk clinical groups (most notably individuals with isolated albuminuria) were not receiving indicated therapy. Additional targeted efforts to increase use of ACE/ARB could improve quality of care and reduce ESRD incidence, both overall and in high-risk ethnic groups. Policy-makers might consider use of ACE/ARB for inclusion in diabetes performance measurement sets.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. U.S. Renal Data System. USRDS 2001 annual data report: atlas of end-stage renal disease in the United States. Bethesda, Md: National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases; 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Mokdad AH, Bowman BA, Ford ES, Vinicor F, Marks JS, Koplan JP. The continuing epidemics of obesity and diabetes in the United States. JAMA. 2001;286:1195–200.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Hostetter TH. Prevention of end-stage renal disease due to type-2 diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2001;345:910–2.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Marcelli D, Spotti D, Conte F, Limido A, Malberti F, Locatelli F. Prognosis of diabetic patients on dialysis: analysis of Lombardy Registry data. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 1995;10:1985–901.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Cowie CC, Port FK, Wolfe RA, Savage PJ, Moll PP, Hawthorne VM. Disparities in incidence of diabetic end-stage renal disease according to race and type of diabetes. N Engl J Med. 1989;321:1074–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Brancati FL, Whittle JC, Whelton PK, Seidler AJ, Klag MJ. The excess incidence of diabetic end-stage renal disease among blacks: a population-based study of potential explanatory factors. JAMA. 1992;268:3079–84.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Krop JS, Coresh J, Chambless LE, et al. A community-based study of explanatory factors for the excess risk for early renal function decline in blacks vs whites with diabetes. Arch Intern Med. 1999;159:1777–83.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Powers DR, Wallin JD. End-stage renal disease in specific ethnic and racial groups: risk factors and benefits of antihypertensive therapy. Arch Intern Med. 1998;158:793–800.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Karter AJ, Ferrarra A, Liu JY, Moffet HH, Ackerson LM, Selby JV. Ethnic disparities in diabetic complications in an insured population. JAMA. 2002;287:2519–27.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. NIDDK, NIH. National Kidney Disease Education Program, 2002. Available at: http://www.ncqa.org/somc2001/diabetes/cdc6_datx.html. Accessed September 12, 2002.

  11. Brenner BM, Cooper ME, deZeeuw D, et al. Effect of losartan on renal and cardiovascular outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes and nephropathy. N Engl J Med. 2001;345:861–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Lewis EJ, Hunsicker LG, Bain RP, Rohde RD. The effect of angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibition on diabetic nephropathy. N Engl J Med. 1993;329:1456–62.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Lewis EJ, Hunsicker LG, Clarke WR, et al. Renoprotective effect of the angiotensin-receptor antagonist irbesartan in patients with neuropathy due to type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2001;345:851–60.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Ravid M, Lang R, Rachmani R, Lishner M. Long-term renoprotective effect of angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibition in non-insulindependent diabetes mellitus. A 7-year follow-up study. Arch Intern Med. 1996;156:286–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Parving HH, Lehnert H, Brochner-Mortensen J, Gomis R, Andersen S, Amer P. Irbesartan in patients with type 2 diabetes and microalbuminuria study group. The effect of irbesartan on the development of diabetic nephropathy in patients with type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2001;345:870–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Bennett PH, Haffner S, Kasiske BL, et al. Screening and management of microalbuminuria in patients with diabetes mellitus: recommendations to the Scientific Advisory Board of the National Kidney Foundation from an ad hoc committee of the Council on Diabetes Mellitus of the National Kidney Foundation. Am J Kidney Dis. 1995;25:107–12.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. American Diabetes Association. Standards of medical care for patients with diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Care. 1997;20:S5-S13.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Ayanian JZ, Udvarhelyi IS, Gatsonis CA, Pashos CL, Epstein AM. Racial differences in the use of revascularization procedures after coronary angiography. JAMA. 1993;269:2642–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Fiscella K, Franks P, Gold MR, Clancy C. Inequality in quality: addressing socioeconomic, racial and ethnic disparities in health care. JAMA. 2000;283:2579–84.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Escarce JJ, Epstein KR, Colby DC, Schwartz JS. Racial differences in the elderly’s use of medical procedures and diagnostic tests. Am J Public Health. 1993;83:948–54.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Gornick ME, Eggers PW, Reilly TW, et al. Effects of race and income on mortality and use of services among Medicare beneficiaries. N Engl J Med. 1996;335:791–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Hegarty V, Burchett BM, Gold DT, Cohen HJ. Racial differences in use of cancer prevention services among older Americans. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2000;48:735–40.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Peterson E, Shaw L, DeLong E, Pryor D, Califf R, Mark D. Racial variation in the use of coronary-revascularization procedures. Are the differences real? Do they matter? N Engl J Med. 1997;336:480–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Institute of Medicine. Unequal treatment: confronting racial and ethnic disparities in health care. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Schneider EC, Cleary PD, Zaslavsky AM, Epstein AM. Racial disparities in influenza vaccination: does managed care narrow the gap between African Americans and whites? JAMA. 2001;286:1455–60.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Schneider EC, Zaslavsky AM, Epstein AM. Racial disparities in the quality of care for enrollees in Medicare managed care. JAMA. 2002;287:1288–94.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Zaslavsky AM, Hochheimer JN, Schneider EC, et al. Impact of sociodemographic case mix on the HEDIS measures of health plan quality. Med Care. 2000;38:981–92.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Gordon NP, Kaplan GA. Some evidence refuting the HMO “favorable selection” hypothesis: the case of Kaiser Permanente. Adv Health Econ Health Serv Res. 1991;12:19–29.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Hiatt RA, Friedman GD. Characteristics of patients referred for treatment of end-stage renal disease in a defined population. Am J Public Health. 1982;72:829–33.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Krieger N. Overcoming the absence of socioeconomic data in medical records: validation and application of a census-based methodology. Am J Public Health. 1992;82:703–10.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Selby JV, Karter AJ, Ackerson LM, Ferrara A, Liu J. Developing a prediction rule from automated clinical databases to identify high-risk patients in a large population with diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2001;24:1547–55.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Selby JV, Ray GT, Zhang D, Colby CJ. Excess costs of medical care for patients with diabetes in a managed care population. Diabetes Care. 1997;20:1396–402.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Selby JV, Ettinger B, Swain B, Brown JB. First 20 months’ experience with use of Metformin for type 2 diabetes in a large health maintenance organization. Diabetes Care. 1999;22:38–44.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Selby JV. Linking automated databases for research in managed care settings. Ann Intern Med. 1997;127:719–24.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Karter AJ, Rowell SE, Ackerson LM, et al. Excess maternal transmission of type 2 diabetes. The Northern California Kaiser Permanente Diabetes Registry. Diabetes Care. 1999;22:938–43.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Karter AJ, Newman B, Rowell S, et al. Large-scale collection of family history data and recruitment of informative families for genetic analysis. J Regist Manag. 1998;25:7–12.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Karter AJ, Ferrara A, Darbinian J, Ackerson LM, Selby JV. Self-monitoring of blood glucose: language and financial barriers in a managed care population with diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2000;23:477–83.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Karter AJ, Ackerson LM, Darbinian JA, et al. Self-monitoring of blood glucose levels and glycemic control: the Northern California Kaiser Permanente Diabetes registry. Am J Med. 2001;111:1–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Iribarren C, Karter AJ, Go AS, et al. Glycemic control and heart failure among adult patients with diabetes. Circulation. 2001;103:2668–73.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Ferrara A, Karter AJ, Ackerson LM, Liu JY, Selby JV. Hormone replacement therapy is associated with better glycemic control in women with type 2 diabetes: the Northern California Kaiser Permanente Diabetes registry. Diabetes Care. 2001;24:1144–50.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Paster RZ, Snavely DB, Sweet AR, et al. Use of losartan in the treatment of hypertensive patients with a history of cough induced by angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors. Clin Ther. 1998;20:978–89.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Tanser PH, Campbell LM, Carranza JK, Toutouzas P, Watts R. for the Multicentre Cough Study Group. Candesartan cilexetil is not associated with cough in hypertensive patients with enalapril-induced cough. Am J Hypertens. 2000;13:214–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. American Diabetes Association. Standards of medical care for patients with diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Care. 1999;22:S32-S41.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Dunn EJ, Burton CJ, Feest TG. The care of patients with diabetic nephropathy: audit, feedback, and improvement. Q J Med. 1999;92:443–9.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Gold JA. A word from WIPRO: improving use of ACE inhibitors in diabetic nephropathy. Wis Med J. 1996;95:588–9.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Scarsi KK, Bjornson DC. The use of ACE inhibitors as renoprotective agents in Medicaid patients with diabetes. Ann Pharmacother. 2000;34:1002–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Gordian ME, Kelly J. Why patients with diabetes, hypertension and/or proteinuria are NOT on angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors. Alaska Med. 1998;40:51–4.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Flack JM, Mensah GA, Ferrario CM. Using angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors in African-American hypertensives: a new approach to treating hypertension and preventing target-organ damage. Curr Med Res Opin. 2000;16:66–79.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Weir MR, Chrysant SG, McCarron DA, et al. Influence of race and dietary salt on the antihypertensive efficacy of na angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor or a calcium channel antagonist in salt-sensitive hypertensives. Hypertension. 1998;31:1088–96.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Fenves A, Ram CV. Are angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin receptor blockers becoming the treatment of choice in African-Americans? Curr Hypertens Rep. 2002;4:286–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Douglas JG, Bakris GL, Epstein M, et al. for the Hypertension in African Americans Working Group. Management of high blood pressure in African Americans. Consensus statement of the Hypertension in African Americans Working Group of the International Society on Hypertension in Blacks. Arch Intern Med. 2003;163:525–41.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. National Committee for Quality Assurance (NCQA). The state of managed care quality, 2001. Available at: http://www.ncqa.org/somc2001/diabetes/cdc6_datx.html. Accessed September 12, 2002.

  53. Hueston WJ, Scibelli S, Mainous AG. Use of microalbuminuria testing in persons with type 2 diabetes: are the right patients being tested? J Fam Pract. 2001;50:669–73.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  54. Gerstein HC, Mann JFE, Yi Q, et al. Albuminuria and risk of cardiovascular events, death, and heart failure in diabetic and nondiabetic individuals. JAMA. 2001;286:421–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  55. Heart Outcomes Prevention Evaluation (HOPE) Study Investigators. Effects of ramipril on cardiovascular and microvascular outcomes in people with diabetes mellitus: results of the HOPE study and MICRO-HOPE substudy. Lancet. 2000;355:253–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Heart Outcomes Prevention Evaluation (HOPE) Study Investigators. Effects of an angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitor, ramipril, on cardiovascular events in high-risk patients. N Engl J Med. 2000;342:145–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Niskanen L, Hedner T, Hansson L, Lanke J, Niklason A. for the CAPPP Study Group. Reduced cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in hypertensive diabetic patients on first-line therapy with an ACE inhibitor compared with a diuretic/beta-blocker-based treatment regimen: a subanalysis of the Captopril Prevention Project. Diabetes Care. 2001;24:2091–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  58. Lindholm LH, Ibsen H, Dahlof B, et al. for the LIFE Study Group. Cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in patients with diabetes in the Losartan Intervention For Endpoint reduction in hypertension study (LIFE): a randomised trial against atenolol. Lancet. 2002;359:1004–10.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  59. Ravid M, Brosh D, Levi Z, Bar-Dayan Y, Ravid D, Rachmani R. Use of enalapril to attenuate decline in renal function in normotensive, normoalbuminuric patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Ann Intern Med. 1998;128:982–8.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  60. Kvetny J, Gregersen G, Pedersen RS. Randomized placebo-controlled trial of perindopril in normotensive, normoalbuminuric patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus. Q J Med. 2001;94:89–94.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  61. The EUCLID study group. Randomised placebo-controlled trial of lisinopril in normotensive patients with insulin-dependent diabetes and normoalbuminuria or microalbuminuria. Lancet. 1997;349:1787–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Boehmer U, Kressin NR, Berlowitz DR, et al. Self-reported vs administrative race/ethnicity data and study results. Am J Public Health. 2002;92:1471–2.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Vleeming W, van Amsterdam JGC, Stricker BHC, de Wildt DJ. ACE inhibitor-induced angioedema: incidence, prevention and management. Drug Saf. 1998;18:171–88.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Allison B. Rosen MD, MPH.

Additional information

Dr. Rosen was supported by an AHRQ Health Services Research Fellowship at the Harvard School of Public Health, grant number 5 T32 HS00020-16. Drs. Karter and Selby and Ms. Liu’s work was supported by grants from the American Diabetes Association and the Kaiser Foundation Research Institute.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rosen, A.B., Karter, A.J., Liu, J.Y. et al. Use of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin receptor blockers in high-risk clinical and ethnic groups with diabetes. J GEN INTERN MED 19, 669–675 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1525-1497.2004.30264.x

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1525-1497.2004.30264.x

Key words

Navigation