Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-hfldf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-01T09:52:31.648Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

What Is Wrong With Turnover Research? Commentary on Russell's Critique

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 January 2015

Peter W. Hom  and
Rodger W. Griffeth
Peter W. Hom*
Affiliation:
Arizona State University
Rodger W. Griffeth
Affiliation:
Arizona State University
*
E-mail: peter.hom@asu.edu, Address: Department of Management, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ 85287-4006
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Dr. Russell (2013) provocatively critiqued turnover research, expressing a sentiment that we share—namely, the lamentable modest predictability of turnover. All the same, we disagree with certain criticisms of turnover theory, methodology, and practicality. We organize our reactions into sections: predictive validity for the standard turnover criterion; other criteria for model evaluation; incremental validity controlling quit intentions; Russell's proposed methodology, the potential biases of the Russell and Van Sell (2012) test; and an alternate approach by Hom, Mitchell, Lee, and Griffeth (2012).

Type
Commentaries
Information
Industrial and Organizational Psychology , Volume 6 , Issue 2 , June 2013 , pp. 174 - 181
Copyright
Copyright © Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology 2013

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (1980). Understanding attitudes and predicting social behavior. Englewood-Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Allen, D., Weeks, K., & Moffitt, K. (2005). Turnover intentions and voluntary turnover: The moderating roles of self-monitoring, locus of control, proactive personality, and risk aversion. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90, 980–990.Google Scholar
Batt, R., & Colvin, A. (2011). An employment systems approach to turnover: Human resources practices, quits, dismissals, and performance. Academy of Management Journal, 54, 695–717.Google Scholar
Carlson, K., & Wu, J. (2012). The illusion of statistical control: Control variable practice in management research. Organizational Research Methods, 15, 413–435.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DeMaris, A. (2002). Explained variance in logistic regression. Sociological Methods & Research, 31, 27–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eby, L., & Russell, J. (2000). Predictors of employee willingness to relocate for the firm. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 57, 42–61.Google Scholar
Gregory-Smith, I., Thompson, S., & Wright, P. (2009). Fired or retired? A competing risk analysis of chief executive turnover. The Economics Journal, 119, 463–481.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Griffeth, R. W., and Hom, P. W. (1988). A comparison of different conceptualizations of perceived alternatives in turnover research. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 9, 103–111.Google Scholar
Griffeth, R. W., Hom, P. W., & Gaertner, S. (2000). A meta-analysis of antecedents and correlates of employee turnover: Update, moderator tests, and research implications for the next millennium. Journal of Management, 26, 463–488.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Griffeth, R. W., Lee, T. W., Mitchell, T. R., & Hom, P. W. (2012). Further clarification on the Hom, Mitchell, Lee, and Griffeth (2012) model: Reply to Bergman, Payne, and Boswell (2012) and Maertz (2012). Psychological Bulletin, 138, 871–875.Google Scholar
Griffeth, R. W., Steel, R., Allen, D., & Bryan, N. (2005). Development and validation of a multidimensional measure of perceived alternatives: The employment opportunity index (EOI). Journal of Applied Psychology, 90, 335–349.Google Scholar
Hom, P. W. (1980). Expectancy predictions of reenlistment in the National Guard. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 16, 235–248.Google Scholar
Hom, P. (2011). Organizational exit. In Zedeck, S. (Ed.), Handbook of industrial/organizational psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 67–117). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
Hom, P. W., & Hulin, C. L. (1981). A competitive test of the prediction of reenlistment by several models. Journal of Applied Psychology, 66, 23–39.Google Scholar
Hom, P., & Kinicki, A. (2001). Toward a greater understanding of how dissatisfaction drives employee turnover. Academy of Management Journal, 44, 975–987.Google Scholar
Hom, P., Caranikas-Walker, F., Prussia, G., & Griffeth, R. (1992). A meta-analytical structural equations analysis of a model of employee turnover. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 890–909.Google Scholar
Hom, P., Griffeth, R., & Sellaro, C. (1984). The validity of Mobley's (1977) model of employee turnover. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 34, 141–174.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hom, P., Leong, F., & Golubovich, J. (2010). Insights from vocational and career developmental theories: Their potential contributions for advancing the understanding of employee turnover. In Liao, H., Martocchio, J., & Joshi, A. (Eds.), Research in personnel and human resources management (Vol. 29, pp. 115–166). Bingley, England: Emerald Group.Google Scholar
Hom, P., Mitchell, T., Lee, T., & Griffeth, R. (2012). Reviewing employee turnover: Focusing on proximal withdrawal states and an expanded criterion. Psychological Bulletin, 138, 831–858.Google Scholar
Hulin, C., Roznowski, M., & Hachiya, D. (1985). Alternative opportunities and withdrawal decisions: Empirical and theoretical discrepancies and an integration. Psychological Bulletin, 97, 233–250.Google Scholar
Jiang, K., Liu, D., McKay, P. F., Lee, T. W., & Mitchell, T. R. (2012). When and how is job embeddedness predictive of turnover? A meta-analytic investigation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 97, 1077–1096.Google Scholar
Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking fast and slow. New York, NY: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.Google Scholar
Kammeyer-Mueller, J. D., Wanberg, C. R., Glomb, T. M., & Ahlburg, D. (2005). The role of temporal shifts in turnover processes: It's about time. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91, 644–658.Google Scholar
Kraimer, M. L., Shaffer, M. A., Harrison, D. A., & Ren, H. (2012). No place like home? An identity strain perspective on repatriate turnover. Academy of Management Journal, 55, 399–420.Google Scholar
Lee, T. W., & Mitchell, T. R. (1994). An alternative approach: The unfolding model of voluntary employee turnover. Academy of Management Review, 19, 51–89.Google Scholar
Lee, T. H., Gerhart, B., Weller, I., & Trevor, C. (2008). Understanding voluntary turnover: Path-specific job satisfaction effects and the importance of unsolicited job offers. Academy of Management Journal, 51, 651–671.Google Scholar
Lee, T. W., Mitchell, T. R., Holtom, B. C., McDaniel, L., & Hill, J. W. (1999). Theoretical development and extension of the unfolding model of voluntary turnover. Academy of Management Journal, 42, 450–462.Google Scholar
Lee, T. W., Mitchell, T. R., Sablynski, C. J., Burton, J. P., & Holtom, B. C. (2004). The effects of job embeddedness on organizational citizenship, job performance, volitional absences, and voluntary turnover. Academy of Management Journal, 47, 711–722.Google Scholar
Lee, T. W., Mitchell, T. R., Wise, L., & Fireman, S. (1996). An unfolding model of voluntary employee turnover. Academy of Management Journal, 39, 5–36.Google Scholar
Maertz, C. P., & Campion, M. A. (2004). Profiles in quitting: Integrating content and process turnover theory. Academy of Management Journal, 47, 566–582.Google Scholar
Maertz, C. P., Stevens, M. J., & Campion, M. A. (2003). A turnover model for the Mexican maquiladoras. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 63, 111–135.Google Scholar
March, J. G., & Simon, H. A. (1958). Organizations. New York, NY: Wiley.Google Scholar
Miller, H. E., Katerberg, R., & Hulin, C. L. (1979). Evaluation of the Mobley, Horner, and Hollingsworth model of employee turnover. Journal of Applied Psychology, 64, 509–517.Google Scholar
Mitchell, T. R., Holtom, B. C., Lee, T. W., Sablynski, C. J., & Erez, M. (2001). Why people stay: Using job embeddedness to predict voluntary turnover. Academy of Management Journal, 44, 1102–1121.Google Scholar
Mobley, W. H. (1977). Intermediate linkages in the relationship between job satisfaction and employee turnover. Journal of Applied Psychology, 62, 237–240.Google Scholar
Mobley, W. H. (1982). Employee turnover: Causes, consequences, and control. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
Mobley, W. H., Griffeth, R. W., Hand, H. H., & Meglino, B. (1979). Review and conceptual analysis of the employee turnover process. Psychological Bulletin, 86, 493–522.Google Scholar
Morita, J. G., Lee, T. W., & Mowday, R. T. (1993). The regression-analog to survival analysis: A selected application to turnover research. Academy of Management Journal, 36, 1430–1464.Google Scholar
Parker, D. F., & Dyer, L. (1976). Expectancy theory as a within-person behavioral choice model: An empirical test of some conceptual and methodological refinements. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 17, 97–117.Google Scholar
Prestholdt, P. H., Lane, I. M., & Mathews, R. C. (1987). Nurse turnover as reasoned action: Development of a process model. Journal of Applied Psychology, 72, 221–227.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Price, J. L., & Mueller, C. W. (1981). A causal model of turnover for nurses. Academy of Management Journal, 24, 543–565.Google Scholar
Price, J. L., & Mueller, C. W. (1986). Absenteeism and turnover of hospital employees. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.Google Scholar
Rusbult, C. E., & Farrell, D. (1983). A longitudinal test of the investment model: The impact on job satisfaction, job commitment and turnover of variations in rewards, costs, alternatives and investments. Journal of Applied Psychology, 68, 429–438.Google Scholar
Russell, C. J. (2013). Is it time to voluntarily turn over theories of voluntary turnover? Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 6, 156–173.Google Scholar
Russell, C. J., & Van Sell, M. (2012). A closer look at decisions to quit. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 117, 125–137. doi: 10.1016/j.obhdp.2011.09.002Google Scholar
Schneider, J. (1976). The “greener grass” phenomenon: Differential effects of a work context alternative on organizational participation and withdrawal intentions. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 16, 308–333.Google Scholar
Shauman, K. A. (2010). Gender asymmetry in family migration: Occupational inequality or interspousal comparative advantage. Journal of Marriage and Family, 72, 375–392.Google Scholar
Sheridan, J. E. (1985). A catastrophe model of employee withdrawal leading to low job performance, high absenteeism, and job turnover during the first year of employment. Academy of Management Journal, (1), 88. doi: 10.2307/256063Google Scholar
Sinclair, R., Tucker, J., Cullen, J., & Wright, C. (2005). Performance differences among four organizational profiles. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90, 1280–1287.Google Scholar
Smith, D. R., Holtom, B. C., & Mitchell, T. R. (2011). Enhancing precision in the prediction of voluntary turnover and retirement. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 79, 290–302.Google Scholar
Steel, R. P. (1996). Labor market dimensions as predictors of the reenlistment decisions of military personnel. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81, 421–428. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.81.4.421Google Scholar
Steel, R. P. (2002). Turnover theory at the empirical interface: Problems of fit and function. Academy of Management Review, 27, 346–360.Google Scholar
Steel, R. P., & Griffeth, R. W. (1989). The elusive relationship between perceived employment opportunity and turnover behavior: A methodological or conceptual artifact? Journal of Applied Psychology, 74, 846–854.Google Scholar
Steel, R. P., & Ovalle, N. K. II. (1984). A review and meta-analysis of research on the relationship between behavioral intentions and employee turnover. Journal of Applied Psychology, 69, 673–686.Google Scholar
Steers, R. M., & Mowday, R. T. (1981). Employee turnover and postdecision accommodation processes. In Cummings, L., & Staw, B. (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (Vol. 3, pp. 235–281). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.Google Scholar
Stroh, L. K., Brett, J. M., & Reilly, A. H. (1996). Family structure, glass ceiling, and traditional explanations for the differential rate of turnover of female and male managers. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 49, 99–118.Google Scholar
Tharenou, P., & Caulfield, N. (2010). Will I stay or will I go? Explaining repatriation by self-initiated expatriates. Academy of Management Journal, 53, 1009–1028.Google Scholar
Woo, S. E. (2011). A study of Ghiselli's hobo syndrome. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 79, 461–469.CrossRefGoogle Scholar