conference papers \(\def\hfill{\hskip 5em}\def\hfil{\hskip 3em}\def\eqno#1{\hfil {#1}}\)

Journal logoJOURNAL OF
APPLIED
CRYSTALLOGRAPHY
ISSN: 1600-5767

Synchrotron X-ray scattering and reflectivity studies of the structure of low dielectric constant SiOCH thin films prepared from bis­tri­methylsilylmethane by chemical vapor deposition

CROSSMARK_Color_square_no_text.svg

aDepartment of Chemistry, Pohang Accelerator Laboratory, National Research Laboratory for Polymer Synthesis and Physics, Center for Integrated Molecular Systems, Polymer Research Institute, and BK School of Molecular Science, Pohang University of Science and Technology (POSTECH), Pohang 790-784, Republic of Korea, and bNano-Thin Film Materials Laboratory, Department of Physics, Cheju National University, Jeju 690-756, Republic of Korea
*Correspondence e-mail: cckyu@cheju.ac.kr, ree@postech.edu

(Received 16 August 2006; accepted 13 December 2006; online 23 December 2006)

Quantitative, non-destructive grazing-incidence X-ray scattering and specular X-ray reflectivity analysis with synchrotron radiation sources, along with spectroscopic ellipsometry analysis, were successfully used to characterize a series of low dielectric constant, nanoporous SiOCH dielectric thin films with nanometre-scale thicknesses prepared by radio-frequency inductively coupled plasma chemical vapor deposition of bistrimethylsilylmethane precursor and oxygen gas at various flow rate ratios followed by annealing at 298, 473, 573 or 673 K. These analyses provided important information on the structures and properties of the nanoporous films. The average size of the nanopores generated in each film was 3.07 nm in radius or less, depending on the process conditions. The film electron densities ranged from 414 to 569 nm−3, the refractive indices ranged from 1.434 to 1.512 at 633 nm wavelength, and the porosities ranged from 16.1 to 38.9%. Collectively, the present findings show that SiOCH thin films of the type reported here are suitable for use as low dielectric constant interdielectric layer materials in the fabrication of advanced integrated circuits.

1. Introduction

Efforts to increase the density and performance of advanced microelectronic devices, as well as to reduce costs, have led to decreases in the active device dimensions of integrated circuits (ICs) through the use of dense conductor-line wiring in multilevel structures and smaller features. However, shrinking the device feature size causes severe resistance–capacitance coupling problems, including signal delay and crosstalk noise between the metal interconnects. This signal delay and noise, as well as power consumption, depend critically on the dielectric constant (k) of the interdielectric layers. Thus, much effort has been devoted to developing new low-k dielectric materials to replace the current workhorse dielectrics, namely silicon dioxide (k = 3.9–4.3) and silicon nitride (k = 6.0–7.0) (Azooz et al., 2003[Azooz, M. A., Hwang, Y. T. & Ree, M. (2003). Egypt. J. Chem. 46, 741-756.]; Bolze et al., 2001[Bolze, J., Ree, M., Youn, H. S., Chu, S.-H. & Char, K. (2001). Langmuir, 17, 6683-6691.]; Maex et al., 2003[Maex, K., Baklanov, M. R., Shamiryan, D., Iacopi, F., Brongersma, S. H. & Yanovitskaya, Z. S. (2003). J. Appl. Phys. 93, 8793-8841.]; Maier, 2001[Maier, G. (2001). Prog. Polym. Sci. 26, 3-65.]; Morgen et al., 2000[Morgen, M., Ryan, E. T., Zhao, J.-H., Hu, C., Cho, T. & Ho, P. S. (2000). Annu. Rev. Mater. Sci. 30, 645-680.]; Kim et al., 2005[Kim, J.-S., Kim, H.-C., Lee, B. & Ree, M. (2005). Polymer, 46, 7394-7402.]; Oh et al., 2003[Oh, W., Hwang, Y.-T., Park, Y. H., Ree, M., Chu, S.-H., Char, K., Lee, J. K. & Kim, S. Y. (2003). Polymer, 44, 2519-2527.]; Lee, Oh, Hwang et al., 2005[Lee, B., Oh, W., Hwang, Y.-T., Park, Y.-H., Yoon, J., Jin, K. S., Heo, K., Kim, J., Kim, K.-W. & Ree, M. (2005). Adv. Mater. 17, 696-701.]; Lee, Oh, Yoon et al., 2005[Lee, B., Oh, W., Yoon, J., Hwang, Y., Kim, J., Landes, B. G., Quintana, J. P. & Ree, M. (2005). Macromolecules, 38, 8991-8995.]; Lee, Park, Hwang et al., 2005[Lee, B., Park, Y.-H., Hwang, Y.-T., Oh, W., Yoon, J. & Ree, M. (2005). Nature Mater. 4, 147-150.]; Lee, Yoon et al., 2005[Lee, B., Yoon, J., Oh, W., Hwang, Y.-T., Heo, K., Jin, K. S., Kim, J., Kim, K.-W. & Ree, M. (2005). Macromolecules, 38, 3395-3405.]; Ree et al., 2006[Ree, M., Yoon, J. & Heo, K. (2006). J. Mater. Chem. 16, 685-697.]; Yoon et al., 2006[Yoon, J., Heo, K., Oh, W., Jin, K. S., Jin, S., Kim, J., Kim, K.-W., Chang, T. & Ree, M. (2006). Nanotechnology, 17, 3490-3498.]).

Recently, thin films of silicon oxide containing alkyl groups (SiOCH) have been intensively studied as alternative dielectrics on account of their low k values, good mechanical strengths, and high thermal stabilities. To date, the preparation of SiOCH dielectrics by plasma-enhanced chemical vapor deposition (PECVD) has been examined using various silane precursors, including trimethylsilane (Loboda et al., 1998[Loboda, M. J., Grove, C. M. & Schneider, R. F. (1998). J. Electrochem. Soc. 145, 2861-2866.]), tetramethylsilane (Grill & Patel, 1999[Grill, A. & Patel, V. (1999). J. Appl. Phys. 85, 3314-3318.]), hexamethyldisiloxane (Shirafuji et al., 1999[Shirafuji, T., Miyajaki, Y., Nakagami, Y., Hayashi, Y. & Nishino, S. (1999). Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 38, 4520-4526.]), and bistrimethylsilylmethane (BTMSM) (Oh et al., 2004[Oh, K. S., Choi, C. K. & Lee, H.-J. (2004). J. Korean Phys. Soc. 45, S855-S860.]; Kim et al., 2003[Kim, H. J., Shao, Q. & Kim, Y.-H. (2003). Surf. Coatings Technol. 171, 39-45.]; Jun et al., 2003[Jun, X., Yang, C. S., Jang, H. R. & Choi, C. K. (2003). J. Electrochem. Soc. 150, F206-F210.]). The resulting SiOCH dielectric films were extensively studied in terms of their chemical compositions and chemical, physical and dielectric properties (Grill & Patel, 1999[Grill, A. & Patel, V. (1999). J. Appl. Phys. 85, 3314-3318.]; Jun et al., 2003[Jun, X., Yang, C. S., Jang, H. R. & Choi, C. K. (2003). J. Electrochem. Soc. 150, F206-F210.]; Kim et al., 2003[Kim, H. J., Shao, Q. & Kim, Y.-H. (2003). Surf. Coatings Technol. 171, 39-45.]; Loboda et al., 1998[Loboda, M. J., Grove, C. M. & Schneider, R. F. (1998). J. Electrochem. Soc. 145, 2861-2866.]; Oh et al., 2004[Oh, K. S., Choi, C. K. & Lee, H.-J. (2004). J. Korean Phys. Soc. 45, S855-S860.]; Shirafuji et al., 1999[Shirafuji, T., Miyajaki, Y., Nakagami, Y., Hayashi, Y. & Nishino, S. (1999). Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 38, 4520-4526.]). However, only a small number of studies on SiOCH dielectrics have examined the film structure, knowledge of which is critical to understanding the dielectric, physical and mechanical properties (Grill et al., 2003[Grill, A., Patel, V., Rodbell, K. P., Huang, E., Bakanov, M. R., Mogilnikov, K. P., Toney, M. & Kim, H.-C. (2003). J. Appl. Phys. 94, 3427-3435.]; Takahashi et al., 2003[Takahashi, K., Mitamura, T., Ono, K., Setsuhara, Y., Itoh, A. & Tachibana, K. (2003). Appl. Phys. Lett. 82, 2476-2478.]; Yu et al., 2003[Yu, S., Wong, T. K. S., Hu, X. & Pita, K. (2003). J. Electrochem. Soc. 150, F166-F121.]).

In the present study, we prepared SiOCH dielectric films on silicon substrates from mixtures of BTMSM and oxygen gas with various compositions by a radio-frequency inductively coupled plasma chemical vapor deposition (ICPCVD) process, and subsequently annealed the films for 30 min in a vacuum at 473, 573, or 673 K. The resulting dielectric films were quantitatively investigated using grazing-incidence X-ray scattering (GIXS) and specular X-ray reflectivity (XR) with synchrotron radiation sources. This combined GIXS and XR analysis provided details on the film structure, electron density, and electron density gradient along the thickness direction, as well as the pore shape and size distribution in the film.

2. Experiment

SiOCH films were prepared on precleaned p-type Si(100) substrates by radio-frequency (13.56 MHz) ICPCVD of a mixture of BTMSM and O2. In the deposition process, the silicon substrates were in a floating potential without heating, and the inductively coupled plasma was generated by means of a three-turn coil, which was set around a quartz tube. A base pressure of 1.33 × 10−4 Pa was reached before each deposition. The BTMSM precursor (410 K boiling point and 232 K melting point at standard atmospheric pressure) was vaporized and carried into the reaction chamber with the aid of inert argon gas from a thermostatic bubbler that was maintained at 313 K. To prevent any condensation of the vaporized BTMSM, all of the gas delivery lines were maintained at 313 K. The O2 and BTMSM gases were introduced into the reaction chamber through a mass flow controller (MFC), and the discharge pressure was measured with a Baratron gauge and kept at about 33.33 Pa. The flow rate ratio [Rfr (%) = BTMSM/(BTMSM + O2)], which is a measure of the composition of the BTMSM/O2 mixture, was varied from 45 to 85% while maintaining a constant total gas flow rate of 40 s.c.c.m. (standard cm3 min−1). The plasma density and electron temperature at an RF power of 300 W were 1012 cm−3 and 1.6 eV, respectively. The deposited films were further annealed for 30 min in a vacuum at 473, 573 or 673 K. The dielectric films obtained were determined to have thicknesses in the range 70–300 nm by spectroscopic ellipsometry.

GIXS measurements were carried out at the 4C1 and 4C2 beamlines (Bolze et al., 2002[Bolze, J., Kim, J., Huang, J.-Y., Rah, S., Youn, H. S., Lee, B., Shin, T. J. & Ree, M. (2002). Macromol. Res. 10, 2-12.], 2001[Bolze, J., Ree, M., Youn, H. S., Chu, S.-H. & Char, K. (2001). Langmuir, 17, 6683-6691.]; Yu et al., 2005[Yu, C.-J., Kim, J., Kim, K.-W., Kim, G.-H., Lee, H.-S., Ree, M. & Kim, K.-J. (2005). J. Korean Vac. Soc. 14, 138-142.]) of the Pohang Accelerator Laboratory (PAL) (Ree & Ko, 2005[Ree, M. & Ko, I. S. (2005). Phys. High Tech. (Korea), 14, 2-7.]). The sample-to-detector distance was 2156 mm, and an X-ray wavelength λ = 0.154 nm and a two-dimensional (2D) charge-coupled detector (CCD) (Roper Scientific, Trenton, NJ) were used. Samples were mounted on a home-made z-axis goniometer equipped with a vacuum chamber. The incidence angle αi of the X-ray beam was set at 0.20°, which is between the critical angles of the films and the silicon substrate (αc,f and αc,s). Scattering angles were corrected for the variations in the positions of the X-ray beams reflected from the silicon substrate interface with changes in the incidence angle αi and by a pre-calibrated copolymer, polystyrene-b-polyethylene-b-polybutadiene-b-polystyrene. Aluminium foil strips were employed as semi-transparent beam stops because the specular reflection from the substrate was much more intense than the GIXS near the critical angle.

Specular XR data were measured at the 3C2 beamline (Park et al., 1995[Park, B.-J., Rah, S.-Y., Park, Y.-J. & Lee, K.-B. (1995). Rev. Sci. Instrum. 66, 1722-1724.]) of PAL. Samples were mounted on a Huber four-circle goniometer, and a scintillation counter with an enhanced dynamic range (Bede Scientific, EDR) was used as a detector. The horizontal beam size at the sample position was ca. 2 mm, and the full width at half-maximum of the direct beam profile measured by a detector scan was 0.015°. The measured reflected intensities were normalized to the intensity of the incident beam, which was monitored using an ionization chamber. Ellipsometric measurements were additionally performed using a spectroscopic ellipsometer (model VASE, Woollam, Lincoln, NE).

3. Results and discussion

The SiOCH dielectrics prepared as thin films supported on silicon substrates were examined by GIXS in order to extract information on the film structure. Fig. 1[link] shows a representative GIXS pattern that was measured at αi = 0.20° for an SiOCH film deposited using a BTMSM flow rate ratio Rfr of 85% and annealed at 673 K. Similar two-dimensional GIXS patterns were obtained for the other dielectric films annealed at 673 K (data not shown).

[Figure 1]
Figure 1
2D GIXS pattern measured at αi = 0.20° for an SiOCH film deposited with a BTMSM flow rate ratio Rfr of 85% and annealed at 673 K. αi is the incident angle at which the X-ray beam impinges on the film surface; αf and 2θf are the exit angles of the X-ray beam with respect to the film surface and to the plane of incidence, respectively.

From the 2D GIXS patterns measured for the films annealed at 673 K, one-dimensional (1D) in-plane and out-of-plane scattering profiles were extracted at αf = 0.18° and 2θf = 0.27°, respectively, where αf is the angle between the scattered beam and the film surface and 2θf is the angle between the scattered beam and the plane of incidence. All extracted in-plane and out-of-plane scattering profiles are plotted together in Fig. 2[link].

[Figure 2]
Figure 2
1D scattering profiles extracted from the 2D GIXS patterns of the SiOCH dielectric films prepared using various BTMSM flow rate ratios, Rfr, and subsequently annealed at 673 K: (a) in-plane scattering profiles extracted at αf = 0.18°; (b) out-of-plane scattering profiles at 2θf = 0.27°. The symbols are the experimental data and the solid lines were obtained by fitting the data with the GIXS formula for spherical scatterers.

We attempted to quantitatively analyze the extracted scattering intensity (IGIXS) profiles using the following recently derived GIXS formula (Lee, Yoon et al., 2005[Lee, B., Yoon, J., Oh, W., Hwang, Y.-T., Heo, K., Jin, K. S., Kim, J., Kim, K.-W. & Ree, M. (2005). Macromolecules, 38, 3395-3405.]; Lee, Park, Yoon et al., 2005[Lee, B., Park, I., Yoon, J., Park, S., Kim, J., Kim, K.-W., Chang, T. & Ree, M. (2005). Macromolecules, 38, 4311-4323.]; Lee, Park, Hwang et al., 2005[Lee, B., Park, Y.-H., Hwang, Y.-T., Oh, W., Yoon, J. & Ree, M. (2005). Nature Mater. 4, 147-150.]; Lee, Park, Hwang et al., 2005[Lee, B., Park, Y.-H., Hwang, Y.-T., Oh, W., Yoon, J. & Ree, M. (2005). Nature Mater. 4, 147-150.]):

[\eqalignno{I_{\rm GIXS} (\alpha _{\rm f}, 2\theta _{\rm f}) &\simeq {1 \over {16\pi^2}} {{1 - \exp[ - 2{\rm Im} (q_{z})d] } \over {2{\rm Im} (q_{z})}}&\cr &\quad\times \left\{\left| T_{\rm i} T_{\rm f}\right|^2 I_1 [q_{||}, {\rm Re} (q_{1,{z}})]\right.&\cr &\quad + \left| T_{\rm i} R_{\rm f} \right|^2 I_1 [q_{||}, {\rm Re} (q_{2,{z}})] &\cr &\quad+ \left| T_{\rm f} R_{\rm i} \right|^2 I_1 [q_{||}, {\rm Re} (q_{3,{z}})]&\cr &\quad+\left. \left| R_{\rm i} R_{\rm f} \right|^2 I_1 [q_{||}, {\rm Re}(q_{4,{z}})] \right\}, &(1)}]

where Im(qz) = |Im(kz,f)| + |Im(kz,i)|, Re(x) is the real part of x, d is the film thickness, Ri and Ti are the reflected and transmitted amplitudes of the incoming X-ray beam, respectively, and Rf and Tf are the reflected and transmitted amplitudes of the outgoing X-ray beam, respectively. In addition, [q_{\rm{||}} = (q_{x}^2 + q_{y}^2) ^{1/2}], q1,z = kz,fkz,i, q2,z = −kz,fkz,i, q3,z = kz,f + kz,i, and q4,z = −kz,f + kz,i; here, kz,i is the z component of the wavevector of the incoming X-ray beam, which is given by [k_{z,{\rm i}} = k_{\rm o} (n_{\rm R}^2 - \cos ^2 \alpha _{\rm i})^{1/2}], and kz,f is the z component of the wavevector of the outgoing X-ray beam, which is given by [k_{z,{\rm f}} = k_{\rm o} (n_{\rm R}^2 - \cos ^2 \alpha _{\rm f} )^{1/2}], where [k_{\rm o} = - 2\pi /\lambda], λ is the wavelength of the X-ray beam, nR is the refractive index of the film given by nR = 1 − δ + iξ with dispersion δ and absorption ξ, αi is the out-of-plane grazing incident angle of the incoming X-ray beam, and αf is the out-of-plane exit angle of the outgoing X-ray beam. qx, qy, and qz are the components of the scattering vector q. I1 is the scattering intensity of the structure in the film, which can be calculated kinematically.

To analyze the scattering profiles using the above GIXS formula, we examined all possible scattering models (sphere, ellipsoid, cylinder, and so on) for the I1 term. We found that a sphere model is the most suitable for the structures in the films (i.e. nanopores).

[I_1 = c\textstyle\int\limits_0^\infty n(r)v(r)^2 |F(qr)|^2 S(qr)\,{\rm{d}}r, \eqno (2)]

where c is a constant, q is the magnitude of the scattering vector q, v(r) is the pore volume, F(qr) is the spherical form factor, and S(qr) is the structure factor for the monodisperse hard sphere model (Kinning & Thomas, 1984[Kinning, D. J. & Thomas, E. L. (1984). Macromolecules, 17, 1712-1718.]; Pedersen, 1994[Pedersen, J. S. (1994). J. Appl. Cryst. 27, 595-608.]). n(r) is the lognormal size distribution function of the pores:

[n(r) = {1 \over {(2\pi )^{1/2} r_{\rm o} \sigma \exp(\sigma ^2 /2)}}\exp\{[ - \ln (r/r_{\rm o})^2]/2\sigma ^2\}, \eqno (3)]

where r is the pore radius, and ro and σ are the pore radius corresponding to the peak maximum and the width of the pore radius distribution, respectively.

As can be seen in Fig. 2[link], the scattering profiles of the SiOCH films prepared with BTMSM flow rate ratios (Rfr) in the range 65–85% can be satisfactorily fitted with the GIXS formula for spherical scatterers [equations (2)[link] and (3)[link]]. The concordance between theory and experiment indicates that the pores generated in the SiOCH dielectric films are spherical and have a sharp interface with the dielectric matrix. For each film, the structural parameters determined by analyzing the in-plane scattering profile were identical with those obtained from the out-of-plane scattering profile, indicating that the pores were randomly dispersed within each film.

In contrast to the films prepared using flow rate ratios Rfr = 65–85%, the films prepared with Rfr = 45% and 55% exhibited featureless scattering profiles both in plane and out of plane (Fig. 2[link]). Further, these scattering data could not be fitted with the GIXS formula for spherical, ellipsoidal, cylindrical, or disc-shaped scatterers. These observations suggest that these dielectric films did not contain any structures or pores, or that if such structures were present, they are very small.

The quantitative data analysis outlined above for the film annealed at 673 K was extended to the in-plane and out-of-plane scattering profiles extracted from the 2D GIXS patterns of the SiOCH dielectric films without and with annealing at 473 or 573 K (data not shown).

The results of the scattering data analyses of all of the films are summarized in Table 1[link]. As can be seen in the table, the generation of pores in the SiOCH dielectric film is strongly dependent on the BTMSM flow rate ratio, Rfr, in the radio-frequency ICPCVD process used in this study. In the systems in which pores were detected, the pores were determined to have an average radius [\overline r] ranging from 2.65 nm for the film deposited with Rfr = 65% to 3.07 nm for the film deposited with Rfr = 85%. The pore size was slightly larger in the films prepared with Rfr = 85% than in the films deposited with Rfr = 65–75%. By contrast, the pore size distribution is almost the same for all of the films deposited with Rfr = 65–85% (Table 1[link] and Fig. 3[link]). Moreover, for the films deposited at a given Rfr condition, the pore size increased slightly with annealing temperature (Table 1[link]). However, annealing had no effect on the pore size distribution. Overall, the present results indicate that spherical nanopores of small size ([\overline r] = 2.65–3.07 nm or less) were created in the SiOCH dielectric films.

Table 1
Pore structures and properties of nanoporous SiOCH dielectric thin films prepared from BTMSM precursor by a radio-frequency ICPCVD process

Flow rate ratio Annealing temperature Pore size and size distribution Properties
Rfr (%) (K) ro (nm) σ [{\overline r] (nm)§ ρe,f (nm−3) Prel (%)†† nR ‡‡
85 298 2.07 0.50 3.01 459 32.3 1.442
473 2.10 0.50 3.05 456 32.7 1.441
573 2.10 0.50 3.05 456 32.7 1.440
673 2.11 0.50 3.07 414 38.9 1.434
75 287 1.88 0.49 2.69 514 24.2 1.443
473 1.88 0.49 2.69 475 29.9 1.442
573 1.92 0.49 2.75 473 30.2 1.441
673 1.97 0.49 2.82 472 30.4 1.435
65 298 1.85 0.49 2.65 532 21.5 1.469
473 1.86 0.49 2.66 521 23.2 1.463
573 1.91 0.49 2.73 509 24.9 1.458
673 1.91 0.49 2.73 505 25.5 1.448
               
55 298 §§ 559 17.6 1.487
473 546 19.5 1.478
573 538 20.6 1.473
673 538 20.6 1.472
45 298 569 16.1 1.512
473 555 18.1 1.495
573 549 19.0 1.493
673 549 19.0 1.486
†Pore radius determined from the peak maximum of the radius r and the number distribution of pores.
‡Width of the radius r and the number distribution of pores.
§Average pore radius determined from the radius r and the number distribution of pores.
¶Electron density determined from the critical angle of the film.
††Porosity estimated from the electron density of the film with respect to the electron density of thermally prepared silicon oxide (678 nm−3).
‡‡Refractive index measured at 633 nm using spectroscopic ellipsometry.
§§No pores were detected in the measurements.
[Figure 3]
Figure 3
Pore radius distribution determined from the GIXS data analysis of an SiOCH film deposited with a BTMSM flow rate ratio of Rfr = 65–85% and subsequently annealed at 673 K.

The SiOCH films were further examined by XR measurements and data analysis. Fig. 4(a)[link] displays a representative XR profile, which was measured for an SiOCH film deposited with Rfr = 85% and subsequently annealed at 673 K. The figure clearly reveals two critical angles of the film and the substrate (αc,f and αc,s) over the qz range of 0.20–0.35 nm−1; here qz is the magnitude of the scattering vector along the direction of the film thickness, which is defined by [q_{\rm{z}} = (4\pi /\lambda )\sin \theta], where λ is the wavelength of the X-ray beam and θ is the grazing-incident angle. Oscillations between the two critical angles are also clearly discernible, which are the waveguide modes for X-rays confined in the film. Thus, the reflected intensity is close to the incident one, although slightly lower due to a certain degree of absorption of X-rays in the film. Once θ exceeds the critical angle of the substrate, a significant portion of the beam penetrates into the substrate and the reflected intensity drops sharply. The steeply decaying reflectivity curve is modulated by high-frequency oscillations, which are commonly referred to as Kiessig fringes (Kiessig, 1931[Kiessig, H. (1931). Ann. Phys. 10, 769-788.]). These fringes appear due to interference between the beams reflected from the film–air surface and those reflected from the film–substrate interface. As the angle increases, the XR profile shows an overall decay of the reflected intensity and of the modulation amplitudes, which can be attributed to the presence of the film_substrate interface and the surface roughness.

[Figure 4]
Figure 4
(a) A representative X-ray reflectivity profile of an SiOCH film deposited with Rfr = 85% and subsequently annealed at 673 K. The symbols are the measured data and the solid line represents the fit curve assuming a homogeneous electron density distribution within the film except for a thin surface skin layer, in which the electron density is slightly different. The inset shows a magnification of the region around the two critical angles: αc,f is the critical angle of the film and αc,s is the critical angle of the Si substrate. (b) A model of the electron density distribution across the film thickness between the silicon substrate and air, which gives the best fit for the XR profile in (a).

The XR data were quantitatively analyzed using the Parratt formalism (Parratt, 1954[Parratt, L. G. (1954). Phys. Rev. 95, 359-369.]) to obtain information on detailed structural parameters such as electron density, electron density gradient across the film thickness, surface roughness, and film thickness. As can be seen in Fig. 4(a[link]), all features of the experimental data are well matched by the fit curve based on the Parratt formalism and a structural model (Fig. 4b[link]) that assumes a homogeneous electron-density distribution throughout the film and a certain amount of surface roughness. It is noteworthy, however, that the minima of the Kiessig fringes are considerably shallower in the experimental data (Fig. 4a[link]) than in the theoretical curve. The shallower depth of the minima in the experimental XR data may be associated with several factors, including a slightly inhomogeneous film thickness on the length scale of the projected beam size, curvature of the substrate induced by residual stress built up at the substrate–film interface, and so on.

The analysis provides the following structural details. The film thickness is precisely determined to be 249.4 ± 0.1 nm, and the average film electron density ρe,f is 414 nm−3; here ρe,f was obtained from the determined αc,f using the relationship, [\alpha _{{\rm{c,f}}} = \lambda \sqrt {\rho _{{\rm{e,f}}} r_{\rm{e}} /\pi } ], where re is the classical electron radius. The film surface roughness is only 0.3 nm, indicative of a very smooth surface. A very thin skin layer (0.9 nm thick) is detected, with an electron density of 356 nm−3. Collectively, the XR data and analysis results indicate that a well defined structure developed in the SiOCH film deposited with Rfr = 85% and subsequently annealed at 673 K.

The above analysis was extended to the XR data for the other films. The findings of the analyses are summarized in Table 1[link], and selected XR data and the corresponding analysis results are shown in Fig. 5[link]. Fig. 5[link](a) displays the XR profiles around αc,f and αc,s of the films deposited with BTMSM flow rate ratios (Rfr) of 45–85% and subsequently annealed at 673 K. All of the fits match well with the locations of the maxima and minima in the experimental data, giving a precise determination of the respective film critical angles αc,f. As Rfr is increased, the film critical angle αc,f clearly decreases, indicative of a decrease in the average film electron density ρe,f. As can be seen in Table 1[link], ρe,f decreases from 549 to 414 nm−3 as Rfr increases from 45 to 85%. Taking into account the finding of the GIXS analysis above that the SiOCH films deposited at Rfr > 45% contain nanopores, and that the nanopore number and size increase with increasing Rfr, we attributed the observed variations in ρe,f to variations in the characteristics of the nanopores in the films. The volume of the pores (i.e. the relative porosity, Prel) created in the films can be estimated as the ρe,f values determined for the films with respect to the ρe,f value for typical thermal silicon oxide, which was determined to be 678 nm−3. The estimated Prel values range from 19.0 to 38.9%, depending on the BTMSM flow rate ratio used in the film formation process (Table 1[link]). A similar trend in the variation of ρe,f with BTMSM flow rate ratio was observed for the dielectric films without and with annealing treatment at other temperatures (Table 1[link]).

[Figure 5]
Figure 5
(a) XR curves around the two critical angles αc,f and αc,s measured for the SiOCH films deposited with various BTMSM flow rate ratios (Rfr) and subsequently annealed at 673 K. (b) XR curves around αc,f and αc,s measured for the SiOCH films deposited with Rfr = 85% and subsequently annealed at various temperatures. The symbols are the measured data and the solid line represents the fit curve.

Fig. 5[link](b) shows the XR profiles around the two critical angles, αc,f and αc,s, for the films deposited with Rfr = 85% and subsequently annealed at various temperatures. As the annealing temperature is increased, αc,f decreases, indicative of a decrease in ρe,f. Indeed, the value of ρe,f decreases from 459 to 414 nm−3 as the annealing temperature is increased from 298 to 673 K (see Table 1[link]). Taking into account the GIXS analysis results above, these variations in ρe,f are again attributed to variations in the characteristics of the nanopores in the films. The volume of the pores (i.e. the relative porosity Prel) created in the films range from 32.3 to 38.9%, depending on the annealing temperature (Table 1[link]). In addition, the XR analysis indicated that the surface roughnesses of all of the films were in the range 0.2−0.5 nm, indicating that they had very smooth surfaces. The films were found to have a skin layer whose thickness ranges from 0.6 to 4.0 nm.

For all of the films, the refractive index nR was measured using spectroscopic ellipsometry. The results are listed in Table 1[link]. The films prepared with higher BTMSM flow rate ratio and annealed at higher temperature showed lower nR values, indicative of a lower electron density.

Taken together, the GIXS, XR and ellipsometry results indicate that in the production of the porous SiOCH dielectric film by the method used here, the feed rate of BTMSM precursor is the major factor influencing the creation and final population of nanopores in the film: higher BTMSM precursor feed rates led to larger pores and higher pore populations. The pore size was slightly increased by the post thermal annealing process, with higher annealing temperatures inducing a greater size increase. Furthermore, the post-annealing process seems to either coarsen the dielectric film or generate additional pores in the film, resulting in a reduction in the electron density of the film.

The annealing-induced reduction in the film electron density might result from the chemical nature of the SiOCH film, in addition to the pores generated in the film. In the film deposition process, use of a higher proportion of BTMSM precursor in the BTMSM/O2 flow causes an increase in the number of carbon atoms incorporated into the Si—O links, which leads to more Si—O—C bonds in the resultant SiOCH film. A high population of Si—O—C bonds in films prepared using high BTMSM precursor levels was previously identified by infrared and X-ray absorption spectroscopy (Oh et al., 2004[Oh, K. S., Choi, C. K. & Lee, H.-J. (2004). J. Korean Phys. Soc. 45, S855-S860.]; Jun et al., 2003[Jun, X., Yang, C. S., Jang, H. R. & Choi, C. K. (2003). J. Electrochem. Soc. 150, F206-F210.]; Yang et al., 2001[Yang, C. S., Oh, K. S., Ryu, J. Y., Kim, D. C., Shou-Yong, J., Choi, C. K., Lee, H.-J., Um, S. H. & Chang, H. Y. (2001). Thin Solid Films, 390, 113-118.]). The higher density of Si—O—C bonds at the expense of Si—O links serves to lower the electron density of the film. Furthermore, Si—O—C bond formation accompanied by the breaking of Si—O links might play a major role in the generation of nanopores in the film process.

4. Conclusions

A series of SiOCH dielectric thin films with nanometre-scale thicknesses were prepared by radio-frequency ICPCVD of BTMSM precursor and O2 at various flow rate ratios and subsequent annealing at 298, 473, 573, or 673 K. The structures and properties of the resulting dielectric thin films were successfully investigated in detail by quantitative, non-destructive GIXS and XR analyses along with ellipsometry. These analyses showed that the ICPCVD of BTMSM precursor and O2 mixtures produces high-performance low-k SiOCH dielectric films with a homogeneous, well defined structure and smooth surface. Moreover, the films contain nanopores and, as a result, have electron densities and refractive indices that are much lower than those of the current workhorse dielectric, silicon dioxide. In the film formation process, a higher amount of BTMSM in the feed mix was found to produce SiOCH films with slightly larger nanopores and lower electron density and refractive index. Thermal annealing at higher temperature was found to further reduce the electron density and refractive index of the film, and to slightly increase the size of the nanopores. On average, the nanopores generated in each film were 3.07 nm in radius or less. The film electron densities ranged from 414 to 569 nm−3, the refractive indices ranged from 1.434 to 1.512 at 633 nm wavelength, and the porosities ranged from 16.1 to 38.9%. The characteristics of the SiOCH thin films produced in present work – homogeneous, well defined structure, smooth surface, and excellent properties – show that these films are suitable for use as low-k interdielectric layer materials in the fabrication of advanced ICs.

Footnotes

K. Heo and K. S. Oh contributed equally to this work.

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the National Research Laboratory (NRL) Program (Contract No. 2005-01385) and the Science Research Center (SRC) Program (Center for Integrated Molecular Systems at Postech) of the Korea Science and Engineering Foundation (KOSEF), by the Ministry of Commerce, Industry and Resources (MCIR) and the Ministry of Science and Technology (MOST) (System IC 2010 Project), by the Nuclear R&D Programs of MOST, and by the Korean Ministry of Education (Brain Korea 21 Program). Synchrotron GIXS and SXR measurements were supported by MOST and POSCO.

References

First citationAzooz, M. A., Hwang, Y. T. & Ree, M. (2003). Egypt. J. Chem. 46, 741–756. CAS
First citationBolze, J., Kim, J., Huang, J.-Y., Rah, S., Youn, H. S., Lee, B., Shin, T. J. & Ree, M. (2002). Macromol. Res. 10, 2–12. CrossRef CAS
First citationBolze, J., Ree, M., Youn, H. S., Chu, S.-H. & Char, K. (2001). Langmuir, 17, 6683–6691. Web of Science CrossRef CAS
First citationGrill, A. & Patel, V. (1999). J. Appl. Phys. 85, 3314–3318. Web of Science CrossRef CAS
First citationGrill, A., Patel, V., Rodbell, K. P., Huang, E., Bakanov, M. R., Mogilnikov, K. P., Toney, M. & Kim, H.-C. (2003). J. Appl. Phys. 94, 3427–3435. Web of Science CrossRef CAS
First citationJun, X., Yang, C. S., Jang, H. R. & Choi, C. K. (2003). J. Electrochem. Soc. 150, F206–F210. Web of Science CrossRef CAS
First citationKiessig, H. (1931). Ann. Phys. 10, 769–788. CrossRef CAS
First citationKim, J.-S., Kim, H.-C., Lee, B. & Ree, M. (2005). Polymer, 46, 7394–7402. Web of Science CrossRef CAS
First citationKim, H. J., Shao, Q. & Kim, Y.-H. (2003). Surf. Coatings Technol. 171, 39–45. Web of Science CrossRef CAS
First citationKinning, D. J. & Thomas, E. L. (1984). Macromolecules, 17, 1712–1718. CrossRef CAS Web of Science
First citationLee, B., Oh, W., Hwang, Y.-T., Park, Y.-H., Yoon, J., Jin, K. S., Heo, K., Kim, J., Kim, K.-W. & Ree, M. (2005). Adv. Mater. 17, 696–701. Web of Science CrossRef CAS
First citationLee, B., Oh, W., Yoon, J., Hwang, Y., Kim, J., Landes, B. G., Quintana, J. P. & Ree, M. (2005). Macromolecules, 38, 8991–8995. Web of Science CrossRef CAS
First citationLee, B., Park, Y.-H., Hwang, Y.-T., Oh, W., Yoon, J. & Ree, M. (2005). Nature Mater. 4, 147–150. Web of Science CrossRef CAS
First citationLee, B., Park, I., Yoon, J., Park, S., Kim, J., Kim, K.-W., Chang, T. & Ree, M. (2005). Macromolecules, 38, 4311–4323. Web of Science CrossRef CAS
First citationLee, B., Yoon, J., Oh, W., Hwang, Y.-T., Heo, K., Jin, K. S., Kim, J., Kim, K.-W. & Ree, M. (2005). Macromolecules, 38, 3395–3405. Web of Science CrossRef CAS
First citationLoboda, M. J., Grove, C. M. & Schneider, R. F. (1998). J. Electrochem. Soc. 145, 2861–2866. Web of Science CrossRef CAS
First citationMaex, K., Baklanov, M. R., Shamiryan, D., Iacopi, F., Brongersma, S. H. & Yanovitskaya, Z. S. (2003). J. Appl. Phys. 93, 8793–8841. Web of Science CrossRef CAS
First citationMaier, G. (2001). Prog. Polym. Sci. 26, 3–65. Web of Science CrossRef CAS
First citationMorgen, M., Ryan, E. T., Zhao, J.-H., Hu, C., Cho, T. & Ho, P. S. (2000). Annu. Rev. Mater. Sci. 30, 645–680. Web of Science CrossRef CAS
First citationOh, K. S., Choi, C. K. & Lee, H.-J. (2004). J. Korean Phys. Soc. 45, S855–S860. CAS
First citationOh, W., Hwang, Y.-T., Park, Y. H., Ree, M., Chu, S.-H., Char, K., Lee, J. K. & Kim, S. Y. (2003). Polymer, 44, 2519–2527. Web of Science CrossRef CAS
First citationOh, W. & Ree, M. (2004). Langmuir, 20, 6932–6939. Web of Science CrossRef PubMed CAS
First citationPark, B.-J., Rah, S.-Y., Park, Y.-J. & Lee, K.-B. (1995). Rev. Sci. Instrum. 66, 1722–1724. CrossRef CAS Web of Science
First citationParratt, L. G. (1954). Phys. Rev. 95, 359–369. CrossRef Web of Science
First citationPedersen, J. S. (1994). J. Appl. Cryst. 27, 595–608. CrossRef Web of Science IUCr Journals
First citationRee, M. & Ko, I. S. (2005). Phys. High Tech. (Korea), 14, 2–7.
First citationRee, M., Yoon, J. & Heo, K. (2006). J. Mater. Chem. 16, 685–697. Web of Science CrossRef CAS
First citationShirafuji, T., Miyajaki, Y., Nakagami, Y., Hayashi, Y. & Nishino, S. (1999). Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 38, 4520–4526. Web of Science CrossRef CAS
First citationTakahashi, K., Mitamura, T., Ono, K., Setsuhara, Y., Itoh, A. & Tachibana, K. (2003). Appl. Phys. Lett. 82, 2476–2478. Web of Science CrossRef CAS
First citationYang, C. S., Oh, K. S., Ryu, J. Y., Kim, D. C., Shou-Yong, J., Choi, C. K., Lee, H.-J., Um, S. H. & Chang, H. Y. (2001). Thin Solid Films, 390, 113–118. Web of Science CrossRef CAS
First citationYoon, J., Heo, K., Oh, W., Jin, K. S., Jin, S., Kim, J., Kim, K.-W., Chang, T. & Ree, M. (2006). Nanotechnology, 17, 3490–3498. Web of Science CrossRef PubMed CAS
First citationYu, C.-J., Kim, J., Kim, K.-W., Kim, G.-H., Lee, H.-S., Ree, M. & Kim, K.-J. (2005). J. Korean Vac. Soc. 14, 138–142.
First citationYu, S., Wong, T. K. S., Hu, X. & Pita, K. (2003). J. Electrochem. Soc. 150, F166–F121. Web of Science CrossRef

© International Union of Crystallography. Prior permission is not required to reproduce short quotations, tables and figures from this article, provided the original authors and source are cited. For more information, click here.

Journal logoJOURNAL OF
APPLIED
CRYSTALLOGRAPHY
ISSN: 1600-5767
Follow J. Appl. Cryst.
Sign up for e-alerts
Follow J. Appl. Cryst. on Twitter
Follow us on facebook
Sign up for RSS feeds