Abstract
A Reply to the Comment by M. Micoulaut and P. Boolchand.
- Received 22 April 2003
DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.91.159602
©2003 American Physical Society
A Reply to the Comment by M. Micoulaut and P. Boolchand.
DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.91.159602
©2003 American Physical Society