Abstract
A Comment on the Letter by R. Danneau et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 106404 (2002). The authors of the Letter offer a Reply.
- Received 5 November 2002
DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.91.049703
©2003 American Physical Society
A Comment on the Letter by R. Danneau et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 106404 (2002). The authors of the Letter offer a Reply.
DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.91.049703
©2003 American Physical Society