Shear thickening and jamming in densely packed suspensions of different particle shapes

Eric Brown, Hanjun Zhang, Nicole A. Forman, Benjamin W. Maynor, Douglas E. Betts, Joseph M. DeSimone, and Heinrich M. Jaeger
Phys. Rev. E 84, 031408 – Published 28 September 2011

Abstract

We investigated the effects of particle shape on shear thickening in densely packed suspensions. Rods of different aspect ratios and nonconvex hooked rods were fabricated. Viscosity curves and normal stresses were measured using a rheometer for a wide range of packing fractions for each shape. Suspensions of each shape exhibit qualitatively similar discontinuous shear thickening. The logarithmic slope of the stress vs shear rate increases dramatically with packing fraction and diverges at a critical packing fraction φc which depends on particle shape. The packing fraction dependence of the viscosity curves for different convex shapes can be collapsed when the packing fraction is normalized by φc. Intriguingly, viscosity curves for nonconvex particles do not collapse on the same set as convex particles, showing strong shear thickening over a wider range of packing fraction. The value of φc is found to coincide with the onset of a yield stress at the jamming transition, suggesting the jamming transition also controls shear thickening. The yield stress is found to correspond with trapped air in the suspensions, and the scale of the stress can be attributed to interfacial tension forces which dramatically increase above φc due to the geometric constraints of jamming. Using this connection we show that the jamming transition can be identified by simply looking at the surface of suspensions. The relationship between shear and normal stresses is found to be linear in both the shear thickening and jammed regimes, indicating that the shear stresses come from friction. In the limit of zero shear rate, normal stresses pull the rheometer plates together due to the surface tension of the liquid below φc, but push the rheometer plates apart due to jamming above φc.

  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
6 More
  • Received 29 June 2011

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.84.031408

©2011 American Physical Society

Authors & Affiliations

Eric Brown1,*, Hanjun Zhang2,†, Nicole A. Forman2,3, Benjamin W. Maynor3, Douglas E. Betts2, Joseph M. DeSimone2,3, and Heinrich M. Jaeger1

  • 1James Franck Institute, The University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois 60637, USA
  • 2Department of Chemistry, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599, USA
  • 3Liquidia Technologies, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27709, USA

  • *Current address: School of Natural Sciences, University of California, Merced, CA 95343.
  • Current address: Duracell Technology Center, The Procter and Gamble Company, Bethel, CT 06801.

Article Text (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand

References (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand
Issue

Vol. 84, Iss. 3 — September 2011

Reuse & Permissions
Access Options
CHORUS

Article Available via CHORUS

Download Accepted Manuscript
Author publication services for translation and copyediting assistance advertisement

Authorization Required


×
×

Images

×

Sign up to receive regular email alerts from Physical Review E

Log In

Cancel
×

Search


Article Lookup

Paste a citation or DOI

Enter a citation
×