Indication of multiscaling in the volatility return intervals of stock markets

Fengzhong Wang, Kazuko Yamasaki, Shlomo Havlin, and H. Eugene Stanley
Phys. Rev. E 77, 016109 – Published 29 January 2008

Abstract

The distribution of the return intervals τ between price volatilities above a threshold height q for financial records has been approximated by a scaling behavior. To explore how accurate is the scaling and therefore understand the underlined nonlinear mechanism, we investigate intraday data sets of 500 stocks which consist of Standard & Poor’s 500 index. We show that the cumulative distribution of return intervals has systematic deviations from scaling. We support this finding by studying the m-th moment μm(τ/τ)m1/m, which show a certain trend with the mean interval τ. We generate surrogate records using the Schreiber method, and find that their cumulative distributions almost collapse to a single curve and moments are almost constant for most ranges of τ. Those substantial differences suggest that nonlinear correlations in the original volatility sequence account for the deviations from a single scaling law. We also find that the original and surrogate records exhibit slight tendencies for short and long τ, due to the discreteness and finite size effects of the records, respectively. To avoid as possible those effects for testing the multiscaling behavior, we investigate the moments in the range 10<τ100, and find that the exponent α from the power law fitting μmτα has a narrow distribution around α0 which depends on m for the 500 stocks. The distribution of α for the surrogate records are very narrow and centered around α=0. This suggests that the return interval distribution exhibits multiscaling behavior due to the nonlinear correlations in the original volatility.

  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Received 30 July 2007

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.77.016109

©2008 American Physical Society

Authors & Affiliations

Fengzhong Wang1, Kazuko Yamasaki1,2, Shlomo Havlin1,3, and H. Eugene Stanley1

  • 1Center for Polymer Studies and Department of Physics, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts 02215, USA
  • 2Department of Environmental Sciences, Tokyo University of Information Sciences, Chiba 265-8501, Japan
  • 3Minerva Center and Department of Physics, Bar-Ilan University, Ramat-Gan 52900, Israel

Article Text (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand

References (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand
Issue

Vol. 77, Iss. 1 — January 2008

Reuse & Permissions
Access Options
Author publication services for translation and copyediting assistance advertisement

Authorization Required


×
×

Images

×

Sign up to receive regular email alerts from Physical Review E

Log In

Cancel
×

Search


Article Lookup

Paste a citation or DOI

Enter a citation
×