Dynamical susceptibility of glass formers: Contrasting the predictions of theoretical scenarios

Cristina Toninelli, Matthieu Wyart, Ludovic Berthier, Giulio Biroli, and Jean-Philippe Bouchaud
Phys. Rev. E 71, 041505 – Published 14 April 2005

Abstract

We compute analytically and numerically the four-point correlation function that characterizes nontrivial cooperative dynamics in glassy systems within several models of glasses: elastoplastic deformations, mode-coupling theory (MCT), collectively rearranging regions (CRR’s), diffusing defects, and kinetically constrained models (KCM’s). Some features of the four-point susceptibility χ4(t) are expected to be universal: at short times we expect a power-law increase in time as t4 due to ballistic motion (t2 if the dynamics is Brownian) followed by an elastic regime (most relevant deep in the glass phase) characterized by a t or t growth, depending on whether phonons are propagative or diffusive. We find in both the β and early α regime that χ4tμ, where μ is directly related to the mechanism responsible for relaxation. This regime ends when a maximum of χ4 is reached at a time t=t* of the order of the relaxation time of the system. This maximum is followed by a fast decay to zero at large times. The height of the maximum also follows a power law χ4(t*)t*λ. The value of the exponents μ and λ allows one to distinguish between different mechanisms. For example, freely diffusing defects in d=3 lead to μ=2 and λ=1, whereas the CRR scenario rather predicts either μ=1 or a logarithmic behavior depending on the nature of the nucleation events and a logarithmic behavior of χ4(t*). MCT leads to μ=b and λ=1γ, where b and γ are the standard MCT exponents. We compare our theoretical results with numerical simulations on a Lennard-Jones and a soft-sphere system. Within the limited time scales accessible to numerical simulations, we find that the exponent μ is rather small, μ<1, with a value in reasonable agreement with the MCT predictions, but not with the prediction of simple diffusive defect models, KCM’s with noncooperative defects, and CRR’s. Experimental and numerical determination of χ4(t) for longer time scales and lower temperatures would yield highly valuable information on the glass formation mechanism.

  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Received 15 December 2004

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.71.041505

©2005 American Physical Society

Authors & Affiliations

Cristina Toninelli1, Matthieu Wyart2, Ludovic Berthier3, Giulio Biroli4, and Jean-Philippe Bouchaud2,5

  • 1ENS 24 rue Lhomond, 75231 Paris Cedex 05, France
  • 2Service de Physique de l’État Condensé Orme des Merisiers—CEA Saclay, 91191 Gif sur Yvette Cedex, France.
  • 3Laboratoire des Verres UMR 5587, Université Montpellier II and CNRS, 34095 Montpellier, France
  • 4Service de Physique Théorique Orme des Merisiers—CEA Saclay, 91191 Gif sur Yvette Cedex, France
  • 5Science & Finance, Capital Fund Management 6-8 Bd Haussmann, 75009 Paris, France

Article Text (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand

References (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand
Issue

Vol. 71, Iss. 4 — April 2005

Reuse & Permissions
Access Options
Author publication services for translation and copyediting assistance advertisement

Authorization Required


×
×

Images

×

Sign up to receive regular email alerts from Physical Review E

Log In

Cancel
×

Search


Article Lookup

Paste a citation or DOI

Enter a citation
×