Control of brain network dynamics across diverse scales of space and time

Evelyn Tang, Harang Ju, Graham L. Baum, David R. Roalf, Theodore D. Satterthwaite, Fabio Pasqualetti, and Danielle S. Bassett
Phys. Rev. E 101, 062301 – Published 1 June 2020

Abstract

The human brain is composed of distinct regions that are each associated with particular functions and distinct propensities for the control of neural dynamics. However, the relation between these functions and control profiles is poorly understood, as is the variation in this relation across diverse scales of space and time. Here we probe the relation between control and dynamics in brain networks constructed from diffusion tensor imaging data in a large community sample of young adults. Specifically, we probe the control properties of each brain region and investigate their relationship with dynamics across various spatial scales using the Laplacian eigenspectrum. In addition, through analysis of regional modal controllability and partitioning of modes, we determine whether the associated dynamics are fast or slow, as well as whether they are alternating or monotone. We find that brain regions that facilitate the control of energetically easy transitions are associated with activity on short length scales and slow timescales. Conversely, brain regions that facilitate control of difficult transitions are associated with activity on long length scales and fast timescales. Built on linear dynamical models, our results offer parsimonious explanations for the activity propagation and network control profiles supported by regions of differing neuroanatomical structure.

  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Received 18 January 2019
  • Revised 31 January 2020
  • Accepted 12 March 2020

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.101.062301

©2020 American Physical Society

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Networks

Authors & Affiliations

Evelyn Tang1,2, Harang Ju1,3, Graham L. Baum1,3, David R. Roalf4, Theodore D. Satterthwaite4, Fabio Pasqualetti5, and Danielle S. Bassett1,4,6,7,8,9

  • 1Department of Bioengineering, School of Engineering & Applied Science, University of Pennsylvania, Pennsylvania 19104, USA
  • 2Max Planck Institute for Dynamics and Self-Organization, Göttingen 37079, Germany
  • 3Neuroscience Graduate Program, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Pennsylvania 19104, USA
  • 4Department of Psychiatry, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Pennsylvania 19104, USA
  • 5Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of California, Riverside, Riverside, California 92521, USA
  • 6Department of Physics & Astronomy, College of Arts & Sciences, University of Pennsylvania, Pennsylvania 19104, USA
  • 7Department of Electrical & Systems Engineering, School of Engineering & Applied Science, University of Pennsylvania, Pennsylvania 19104, USA
  • 8Department of Neurology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Pennsylvania 19104, USA
  • 9Santa Fe Institute, Santa Fe, New Mexico 87501, USA

Article Text (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand

References (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand
Issue

Vol. 101, Iss. 6 — June 2020

Reuse & Permissions
Access Options
Author publication services for translation and copyediting assistance advertisement

Authorization Required


×
×

Images

×

Sign up to receive regular email alerts from Physical Review E

Log In

Cancel
×

Search


Article Lookup

Paste a citation or DOI

Enter a citation
×