Where do the AMS-02 antihelium events come from?

Vivian Poulin, Pierre Salati, Ilias Cholis, Marc Kamionkowski, and Joseph Silk
Phys. Rev. D 99, 023016 – Published 28 January 2019

Abstract

We discuss the origin of the antihelium-3 and -4 events possibly detected by AMS-02. Using up-to-date semianalytical tools, we show that spallation from primary hydrogen and helium nuclei onto the ISM predicts a He3¯ flux typically one to two orders of magnitude below the sensitivity of AMS-02 after 5 years, and a He4¯ flux roughly 5 orders of magnitude below the AMS-02 sensitivity. We argue that dark matter annihilations face similar difficulties in explaining this event. We then entertain the possibility that these events originate from antimatter-dominated regions in the form of anticlouds or antistars. In the case of anticlouds, we show how the isotopic ratio of antihelium nuclei might suggest that BBN has happened in an inhomogeneous manner, resulting in antiregions with a antibaryon-to-photon ratio η¯103η. We discuss properties of these regions, as well as relevant constraints on the presence of anticlouds in our Galaxy. We present constraints from the survival of anticlouds in the Milky-Way and in the early Universe, as well as from CMB, gamma-ray and cosmic-ray observations. In particular, these require the anticlouds to be almost free of normal matter. We also discuss an alternative where antidomains are dominated by surviving antistars. We suggest that part of the unidentified sources in the 3FGL catalog can originate from anticlouds or antistars. AMS-02 and GAPS data could further probe this scenario.

  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Received 17 September 2018

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.99.023016

© 2019 American Physical Society

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Gravitation, Cosmology & Astrophysics

Authors & Affiliations

Vivian Poulin1, Pierre Salati2, Ilias Cholis3,1, Marc Kamionkowski1, and Joseph Silk1,4,5

  • 1Department of Physics and Astronomy, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland 21218, USA
  • 2LAPTh, Université Savoie Mont Blanc & CNRS, 74941 Annecy Cedex, France
  • 3Department of Physics, Oakland University, Rochester, Michigan 48309, USA
  • 4Sorbonne Universités, UPMC Univ. Paris 6 et CNRS, UMR 7095, Institut dAstrophysique de Paris, 98 bis bd Arago, 75014 Paris, France
  • 5Beecroft Institute of Particle Astrophysics and Cosmology, Department of Physics, University of Oxford, Denys Wilkinson Building, 1 Keble Road, Oxford OX1 3RH, United Kingdom

Article Text (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand

References (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand
Issue

Vol. 99, Iss. 2 — 15 January 2019

Reuse & Permissions
Access Options
CHORUS

Article Available via CHORUS

Download Accepted Manuscript
Author publication services for translation and copyediting assistance advertisement

Authorization Required


×
×

Images

×

Sign up to receive regular email alerts from Physical Review D

Log In

Cancel
×

Search


Article Lookup

Paste a citation or DOI

Enter a citation
×