Constraining dark energy dynamics in extended parameter space

Eleonora Di Valentino, Alessandro Melchiorri, Eric V. Linder, and Joseph Silk
Phys. Rev. D 96, 023523 – Published 19 July 2017

Abstract

Dynamical dark energy has been recently suggested as a promising and physical way to solve the 3 sigma tension on the value of the Hubble constant H0 between the direct measurement of Riess et al. (2016) (R16, hereafter) and the indirect constraint from cosmic microwave anisotropies obtained by the Planck satellite under the assumption of a ΛCDM model. In this paper, by parametrizing dark energy evolution using the w0wa approach, and considering a 12 parameter extended scenario, we find that: (a) the tension on the Hubble constant can indeed be solved with dynamical dark energy, (b) a cosmological constant is ruled out at more than 95% c.l. by the Planck+R16 dataset, and (c) all of the standard quintessence and half of the “downward going” dark energy model space (characterized by an equation of state that decreases with time) is also excluded at more than 95% c.l. These results are further confirmed when cosmic shear, CMB lensing, or SN Ia luminosity distance data are also included. The best fit value of the χ2 for the Planck+R16 data set improves by Δχ2=12.9 when moving to 12 parameters respect to standard ΛCDM. However, tension remains with the BAO dataset. A cosmological constant and small portion of the freezing quintessence models are still in agreement with the Planck+R16+BAO data set at between 68% and 95% c.l. Conversely, for Planck plus a phenomenological H0 prior, both thawing and freezing quintessence models prefer a Hubble constant of less than 70km/s/Mpc. The general conclusions hold also when considering models with nonzero spatial curvature.

  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Received 11 April 2017

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.96.023523

© 2017 American Physical Society

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Gravitation, Cosmology & Astrophysics

Authors & Affiliations

Eleonora Di Valentino1,2,*, Alessandro Melchiorri3,†, Eric V. Linder4,5,‡, and Joseph Silk1,6,7,8,§

  • 1Institut d’Astrophysique de Paris (UMR7095: CNRS & UPMC- Sorbonne Universities), F-75014 Paris, France
  • 2Sorbonne Universités, Institut Lagrange de Paris (ILP), F-75014 Paris, France
  • 3Physics Department and INFN, Università di Roma “La Sapienza”, Ple Aldo Moro 2, 00185 Rome, Italy
  • 4Berkeley Center for Cosmological Physics & Berkeley Lab, University of California, Berkeley, California 94720, USA
  • 5Energetic Cosmos Laboratory, Nazarbayev University, Astana, Kazakhstan 010000
  • 6AIM-Paris-Saclay, CEA/DSM/IRFU, CNRS, Université Paris VII, F-91191 Gif-sur-Yvette, France
  • 7Department of Physics and Astronomy, The Johns Hopkins University Homewood Campus, Baltimore, Maryland 21218, USA
  • 8BIPAC, Department of Physics, University of Oxford, Keble Road, Oxford OX1 3RH, United Kingdom

  • *eleonora.di_valentino@iap.fr
  • alessandro.melchiorri@roma1.infn.it
  • evlinder@lbl.gov
  • §silk@iap.fr

Article Text (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand

References (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand
Issue

Vol. 96, Iss. 2 — 15 July 2017

Reuse & Permissions
Access Options
CHORUS

Article Available via CHORUS

Download Accepted Manuscript
Author publication services for translation and copyediting assistance advertisement

Authorization Required


×
×

Images

×

Sign up to receive regular email alerts from Physical Review D

Log In

Cancel
×

Search


Article Lookup

Paste a citation or DOI

Enter a citation
×