Data-analysis driven comparison of analytic and numerical coalescing binary waveforms: Nonspinning case

Yi Pan, Alessandra Buonanno, John G. Baker, Joan Centrella, Bernard J. Kelly, Sean T. McWilliams, Frans Pretorius, and James R. van Meter
Phys. Rev. D 77, 024014 – Published 10 January 2008

Abstract

We compare waveforms obtained by numerically evolving nonspinning binary black holes to post-Newtonian (PN) template families currently used in the search for gravitational waves by ground-based detectors. We find that the time-domain 3.5PN template family, which includes the inspiral phase, has fitting factors (FFs) 0.96 for binary systems with total mass M=1020M. The time-domain 3.5PN effective-one-body template family, which includes the inspiral, merger, and ring-down phases, gives satisfactory signal-matching performance with FFs 0.96 for binary systems with total mass M=10120M. If we introduce a cutoff frequency properly adjusted to the final black-hole ring-down frequency, we find that the frequency-domain stationary-phase-approximated template family at 3.5PN order has FFs 0.96 for binary systems with total mass M=1020M. However, to obtain high matching performances for larger binary masses, we need to either extend this family to unphysical regions of the parameter space or introduce a 4PN order coefficient in the frequency-domain gravitational wave (GW) phase. Finally, we find that the phenomenological Buonanno-Chen-Vallisneri family has FFs 0.97 with total mass M=10120M. The main analyses use the noise-spectral density of LIGO, but several tests are extended to VIRGO and advanced LIGO noise-spectral densities.

  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
10 More
  • Received 16 April 2007

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.77.024014

©2008 American Physical Society

Authors & Affiliations

Yi Pan1, Alessandra Buonanno1, John G. Baker2, Joan Centrella2, Bernard J. Kelly2, Sean T. McWilliams1, Frans Pretorius3, and James R. van Meter2,4

  • 1Department of Physics, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland 20742, USA
  • 2Gravitational Astrophysics Laboratory, NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, 8800 Greenbelt Rd., Greenbelt, Maryland 20771, USA
  • 3Department of Physics, Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey 08544, USA
  • 4Center for Space Science & Technology, University of Maryland Baltimore County, Physics Department, 1000 Hilltop Circle, Baltimore, Maryland 21250, USA

Article Text (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand

References (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand
Issue

Vol. 77, Iss. 2 — 15 January 2008

Reuse & Permissions
Access Options
Author publication services for translation and copyediting assistance advertisement

Authorization Required


×
×

Images

×

Sign up to receive regular email alerts from Physical Review D

Log In

Cancel
×

Search


Article Lookup

Paste a citation or DOI

Enter a citation
×