• Rapid Communication

Measurement of the entry-spin distribution imparted to the high excitation continuum region of gadolinium nuclei via (p,d) and (p,t) reactions

T. J. Ross, C. W. Beausang, R. O. Hughes, J. M. Allmond, C. T. Angell, M. S. Basunia, D. L. Bleuel, J. T. Harke, R. J. Casperson, J. E. Escher, P. Fallon, R. Hatarik, J. Munson, S. Paschalis, M. Petri, L. Phair, J. J. Ressler, N. D. Scielzo, and I. J. Thompson
Phys. Rev. C 85, 051304(R) – Published 24 May 2012

Abstract

Over the last several years, the surrogate reaction technique has been successfully employed to extract (n,f) and (n,γ) cross sections in the actinide region to a precision of 5% and 20%, respectively. However, attempts to apply the technique in the rare earth region have shown large (factors of 2–3) discrepancies between the directly measured (n,γ) and extracted surrogate cross sections. One possible origin of this discrepancy lies in differences between the initial spin-parity population distribution in the neutron induced and surrogate reactions. To address this issue, the angular momentum transfer to the high excitation energy quasicontinuum region in Gd nuclei has been investigated. The (p,d) and (p,t) reactions on 154,158Gd at a beam energy of 25 MeV were utilized. Assuming a single dominant angular momentum transfer component, the measured angular distribution for the (p,d) reactions is well reproduced by distorted-wave Born approximation (DWBA) calculations for ΔL=4  transfer, whereas the (p,t) reactions are better characterized by ΔL=5 . A linear combination of DWBA calculations, weighted according to a distribution of L transfers (peaking around ΔL=4–5 ), is in excellent agreement with the experimental angular distributions.

  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Received 17 April 2012

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.85.051304

©2012 American Physical Society

Authors & Affiliations

T. J. Ross1,2, C. W. Beausang1, R. O. Hughes1, J. M. Allmond3, C. T. Angell4,*, M. S. Basunia5, D. L. Bleuel6, J. T. Harke6, R. J. Casperson6, J. E. Escher6, P. Fallon5, R. Hatarik5, J. Munson4, S. Paschalis5,†, M. Petri5,†, L. Phair5, J. J. Ressler6, N. D. Scielzo6, and I. J. Thompson6

  • 1Department of Physics, University of Richmond, Richmond, Virginia 23173, USA
  • 2Department of Physics, University of Surrey, Guildford, Surrey, GU2 7JL, UK
  • 3JIHIR, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37831, USA
  • 4Department of Nuclear Engineering, University of California, Berkeley, California 94720, USA
  • 5Nuclear Science Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, California 94720, USA
  • 6Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, California 94551, USA

  • *Current address: Quantum Beam Science Directorate, Japan Atomic Energy Agency, Tokai, Ibaraki 319-1195, Japan.
  • Current address: IKP, TU Darmstadt, 64289 Darmstadt, Germany.

Article Text (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand

References (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand
Issue

Vol. 85, Iss. 5 — May 2012

Reuse & Permissions
Access Options
Author publication services for translation and copyediting assistance advertisement

Authorization Required


×
×

Images

×

Sign up to receive regular email alerts from Physical Review C

Log In

Cancel
×

Search


Article Lookup

Paste a citation or DOI

Enter a citation
×