Strongly distinct electrical response between circular and valley polarization in bilayer transition metal dichalcogenides

Luojun Du, Mengzhou Liao, Gui-Bin Liu, Qinqin Wang, Rong Yang, Dongxia Shi, Yugui Yao, and Guangyu Zhang
Phys. Rev. B 99, 195415 – Published 10 May 2019
PDFHTMLExport Citation

Abstract

We introduce a physical model to describe the influence of a perpendicular electric field on circular polarization (CP) and valley polarization (VP) in bilayer transition metal dichalcogenides. Our results uncover that electric-field-dependent CP and VP are quite distinct from each other. The dependence of CP on the electric field harbors a W pattern and possesses the minimum when the potential energy difference between the two layers is equal to the strength of spin-orbit coupling. Such dependence of CP stems from the modulation of energy cost for interlayer hopping and spin-dependent layer polarization. In contrast, VP is strictly absent in primitive bilayers and increases monotonically with increasing strength of electric field, resulting from the continuous variation of valley magnetic moments and inversion-symmetry breaking. Our model elaborates well the recent experimental observations for which the origin is under debate. Moreover, we demonstrate that the manipulation of layer and valley pseudospin is fully tunable by perpendicular electric fields, paving the way for prospects in electrical control of exotic layer-valleytronics.

  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Received 17 October 2018
  • Revised 24 April 2019

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.99.195415

©2019 American Physical Society

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Condensed Matter, Materials & Applied Physics

Authors & Affiliations

Luojun Du1,2, Mengzhou Liao1, Gui-Bin Liu3,*, Qinqin Wang1, Rong Yang1, Dongxia Shi1,4,5, Yugui Yao3, and Guangyu Zhang1,4,5,6,7,†

  • 1Institute of Physics and Beijing National Laboratory for Condensed Matter Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China
  • 2Department of Electronics and Nanoengineering, Aalto University, Tietotie 3, FI-02150, Finland
  • 3Beijing Key Laboratory of Nanophotonics and Ultrafine Optoelectronic Systems, School of Physics, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing 100081, China
  • 4School of Physical Sciences, University of Chinese Academy of Science, Beijing 100190, China
  • 5Beijing Key Laboratory for Nanomaterials and Nanodevices, Beijing 100190, China
  • 6Collaborative Innovation Center of Quantum Matter, Beijing 100190, China
  • 7Songshan-Lake Materials Laboratory, Dongguan 523808, Guangdong Province, China

  • *Corresponding author: gbliu@bit.edu.cn
  • Corresponding author: gyzhang@iphy.ac.cn

Article Text (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand

Supplemental Material (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand

References (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand
Issue

Vol. 99, Iss. 19 — 15 May 2019

Reuse & Permissions
Access Options
Author publication services for translation and copyediting assistance advertisement

Authorization Required


×
×

Images

×

Sign up to receive regular email alerts from Physical Review B

Log In

Cancel
×

Search


Article Lookup

Paste a citation or DOI

Enter a citation
×