Quantum charge fluctuations of a proximitized nanowire

Roman M. Lutchyn, Karsten Flensberg, and Leonid I. Glazman
Phys. Rev. B 94, 125407 – Published 6 September 2016

Abstract

Motivated by a recent experiment [Nature (London) 531, 206 (2016)], we consider charging of a nanowire which is proximitized by a superconductor and connected to a normal-state lead by a single-channel junction. The charge Q of the nanowire is controlled by gate voltage eNg/C. A finite conductance of the contact allows for quantum charge fluctuations, making the function Q(Ng) continuous. It depends on the relation between the superconducting gap Δ and the effective charging energy EC*. The latter is determined by the junction conductance in addition to the geometrical capacitance of the proximitized nanowire. We investigate Q(Ng) at zero magnetic field B and at fields exceeding the critical value Bc corresponding to the topological phase transition [Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 077001 (2010); Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 177002 (2010)]. Unlike the case of Δ=0, the function Q(Ng) is analytic even in the limit of negligible level spacing in the nanowire. At B=0 and Δ>EC*, the maxima of dQ/dNg are smeared by 2e fluctuations described by a single-channel “charge Kondo” physics, whereas the B=0,Δ<EC* case is described by a crossover between the Kondo and the mixed-valence regimes of the Anderson impurity model. In the topological phase, Q(Ng) is an analytic function of the gate voltage with e-periodic steps. In the weak-tunneling limit, dQ/dNg has peaks corresponding to Breit-Wigner resonances, whereas in the strong-tunneling limit (i.e., small reflection amplitude r) these resonances are broadened, and dQ/dNgercos(2πNg).

  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Received 5 July 2016

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.94.125407

©2016 American Physical Society

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Condensed Matter, Materials & Applied PhysicsQuantum Information, Science & Technology

Authors & Affiliations

Roman M. Lutchyn1, Karsten Flensberg2, and Leonid I. Glazman3

  • 1Station Q, Microsoft Research, Santa Barbara, California 93106-6105, USA
  • 2Center for Quantum Devices and Station Q Copenhagen, Niels Bohr Institute, University of Copenhagen, DK-2100 Copenhagen, Denmark
  • 3Department of Physics, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut 06520, USA

Article Text (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand

References (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand
Issue

Vol. 94, Iss. 12 — 15 September 2016

Reuse & Permissions
Access Options
CHORUS

Article Available via CHORUS

Download Accepted Manuscript
Author publication services for translation and copyediting assistance advertisement

Authorization Required


×
×

Images

×

Sign up to receive regular email alerts from Physical Review B

Log In

Cancel
×

Search


Article Lookup

Paste a citation or DOI

Enter a citation
×