• Editors' Suggestion
  • Rapid Communication

Classical nature of nuclear spin noise near clock transitions of Bi donors in silicon

Wen-Long Ma, Gary Wolfowicz, Shu-Shen Li, John J. L. Morton, and Ren-Bao Liu
Phys. Rev. B 92, 161403(R) – Published 8 October 2015
PDFHTMLExport Citation

Abstract

Whether a quantum bath can be approximated as classical Gaussian noise is a fundamental issue in central spin decoherence and also of practical importance in designing noise-resilient quantum control. Spin qubits based on bismuth donors in silicon have tunable interactions with nuclear spin baths and are first-order insensitive to magnetic noise at so-called clock transitions (CTs). This system is therefore ideal for studying the quantum/classical Gaussian nature of nuclear spin baths since the qubit-bath interaction strength determines the back-action on the baths and hence the adequacy of a Gaussian noise model. We develop a Gaussian noise model with noise correlations determined by quantum calculations and compare the classical noise approximation to the full quantum bath theory. We experimentally test our model through a dynamical decoupling sequence of up to 128 pulses, finding good agreement with simulations and measuring electron spin coherence times approaching 1 s—notably using natural silicon. Our theoretical and experimental study demonstrates that the noise from a nuclear spin bath is analogous to classical Gaussian noise if the back-action of the qubit on the bath is small compared to the internal bath dynamics, as is the case close to CTs. However, far from the CTs, the back-action of the central spin on the bath is such that the quantum model is required to accurately model spin decoherence.

  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Received 19 May 2015
  • Revised 13 September 2015

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.92.161403

©2015 American Physical Society

Authors & Affiliations

Wen-Long Ma1,2,3, Gary Wolfowicz4,5, Shu-Shen Li1,3, John J. L. Morton4,6,*, and Ren-Bao Liu2,7,8,†

  • 1State Key Laboratory of Superlattices and Microstructures, Institute of Semiconductors, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100083, China
  • 2Department of Physics, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, N.T., Hong Kong, China
  • 3Synergetic Innovation Center of Quantum Information and Quantum Physics, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, Anhui 230026, China
  • 4London Centre for Nanotechnology, University College London, London WC1H 0AH, United Kingdom
  • 5Department of Materials, Oxford University, Oxford OX1 3PH, United Kingdom
  • 6Department of Electronic and Electrical Engineering, University College London, London WC1E 7JE, United Kingdom
  • 7Centre for Quantum Coherence, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, N.T., Hong Kong, China
  • 8Institute of Theoretical Physics, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, N.T., Hong Kong, China

  • *jjl.morton@ucl.ac.uk
  • rbliu@phys.cuhk.edu.hk

Article Text (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand

Supplemental Material (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand

References (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand
Issue

Vol. 92, Iss. 16 — 15 October 2015

Reuse & Permissions
Access Options
Author publication services for translation and copyediting assistance advertisement

Authorization Required


×
×

Images

×

Sign up to receive regular email alerts from Physical Review B

Log In

Cancel
×

Search


Article Lookup

Paste a citation or DOI

Enter a citation
×