Group-IIIA versus IIIB delafossites: Electronic structure study

Muhammad N. Huda, Yanfa Yan, Aron Walsh, Su-Huai Wei, and Mowafak M. Al-Jassim
Phys. Rev. B 80, 035205 – Published 23 July 2009

Abstract

First-principles density-functional theory calculations reveal significantly different behavior between group-IIIA and IIIB delafossites CuMO2. The group-IIIA delafossites have indirect band gaps with large differences between the direct and indirect band gaps. However, this difference is small for the group-IIIB delafossites: only 0.22 eV for CuScO2 and it diminishes further for CuYO2 and CuLaO2. Also, whereas group IIIA prefers rhombohedral stacking, group IIIB stabilizes in hexagonal structures. We further find that CuScO2 has the highest calculated fundamental band gap among all the delafossite oxides. In addition, CuLaO2 is found to have a direct band gap. These differences are explained by the different atomic configurations between the group-IIIA and IIIB elements. Our understanding of these delafossites provides general guidance for proper selection of delafossites for suitable applications in optoelectronic devices.

  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Received 3 March 2009

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.80.035205

©2009 American Physical Society

Authors & Affiliations

Muhammad N. Huda*, Yanfa Yan, Aron Walsh, Su-Huai Wei, and Mowafak M. Al-Jassim

  • National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Golden, Colorado 80401, USA

  • *muhammad.huda@nrel.gov

Article Text (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand

References (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand
Issue

Vol. 80, Iss. 3 — 15 July 2009

Reuse & Permissions
Access Options
Author publication services for translation and copyediting assistance advertisement

Authorization Required


×
×

Images

×

Sign up to receive regular email alerts from Physical Review B

Log In

Cancel
×

Search


Article Lookup

Paste a citation or DOI

Enter a citation
×