Uniqueness of quantum states compatible with given measurement results

Jianxin Chen, Hillary Dawkins, Zhengfeng Ji, Nathaniel Johnston, David Kribs, Frederic Shultz, and Bei Zeng
Phys. Rev. A 88, 012109 – Published 11 July 2013

Abstract

We discuss the uniqueness of quantum states compatible with given measurement results for a set of observables. For a given pure state, we consider two different types of uniqueness: (1) no other pure state is compatible with the same measurement results and (2) no other state, pure or mixed, is compatible with the same measurement results. For case (1), it was known that for a d-dimensional Hilbert space, there exists a set of 4d5 observables that uniquely determines any pure state. We show that for case (2), 5d7 observables suffice to uniquely determine any pure state. Thus, there is a gap between the results for (1) and (2), and we give some examples to illustrate this. Unique determination of a pure state by its reduced density matrices (RDMs), a special case of determination by observables, is also discussed. We improve the best-known bound on local dimensions in which almost all pure states are uniquely determined by their RDMs for case (2). We further discuss circumstances where (1) can imply (2). We use convexity of the numerical range of operators to show that when only two observables are measured, (1) always implies (2). More generally, if there is a compact group of symmetries of the state space which has the span of the observables measured as the set of fixed points, then (1) implies (2). We analyze the possible dimensions for the span of such observables. Our results extend naturally to the case of low-rank quantum states.

  • Figure
  • Received 2 April 2013

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.88.012109

©2013 American Physical Society

Authors & Affiliations

Jianxin Chen1,2, Hillary Dawkins1, Zhengfeng Ji2,3, Nathaniel Johnston1,2, David Kribs1,2, Frederic Shultz4, and Bei Zeng1,2

  • 1Department of Mathematics & Statistics, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, Canada
  • 2Institute for Quantum Computing, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada
  • 3State Key Laboratory of Computer Science, Institute of Software, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China
  • 4Mathematics Department, Wellesley College, Wellesley, Massachusetts 02481, USA

Article Text (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand

References (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand
Issue

Vol. 88, Iss. 1 — July 2013

Reuse & Permissions
Access Options
Author publication services for translation and copyediting assistance advertisement

Authorization Required


×
×

Images

×

Sign up to receive regular email alerts from Physical Review A

Log In

Cancel
×

Search


Article Lookup

Paste a citation or DOI

Enter a citation
×