Passive decoy-state quantum key distribution with practical light sources

Marcos Curty, Xiongfeng Ma, Bing Qi, and Tobias Moroder
Phys. Rev. A 81, 022310 – Published 10 February 2010

Abstract

Decoy states have been proven to be a very useful method for significantly enhancing the performance of quantum key distribution systems with practical light sources. Although active modulation of the intensity of the laser pulses is an effective way of preparing decoy states in principle, in practice passive preparation might be desirable in some scenarios. Typical passive schemes involve parametric down-conversion. More recently, it has been shown that phase-randomized weak coherent pulses (WCP) can also be used for the same purpose [M. Curty et al., Opt. Lett. 34, 3238 (2009).] This proposal requires only linear optics together with a simple threshold photon detector, which shows the practical feasibility of the method. Most importantly, the resulting secret key rate is comparable to the one delivered by an active decoy-state setup with an infinite number of decoy settings. In this article we extend these results, now showing specifically the analysis for other practical scenarios with different light sources and photodetectors. In particular, we consider sources emitting thermal states, phase-randomized WCP, and strong coherent light in combination with several types of photodetectors, like, for instance, threshold photon detectors, photon number resolving detectors, and classical photodetectors. Our analysis includes as well the effect that detection inefficiencies and noise in the form of dark counts shown by current threshold detectors might have on the final secret key rate. Moreover, we provide estimations on the effects that statistical fluctuations due to a finite data size can have in practical implementations.

  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
7 More
  • Received 14 November 2009

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.81.022310

©2010 American Physical Society

Authors & Affiliations

Marcos Curty1, Xiongfeng Ma2, Bing Qi3, and Tobias Moroder2,4,5

  • 1ETSI Telecomunicación, Department of Signal Theory and Communications, University of Vigo, Campus Universitario, E-36310 Vigo (Pontevedra), Spain
  • 2Institute for Quantum Computing & Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Waterloo, N2L 3G1 Waterloo, Ontario, Canada
  • 3Center for Quantum Information and Quantum Control, Department of Physics and Department of Electrical & Computer Engineering, University of Toronto, M5S 3G4 Toronto, Ontario, Canada
  • 4Quantum Information Theory Group, Institute of Theoretical Physics I, University of Erlangen-Nürnberg, D-91058 Erlangen, Germany
  • 5Max Planck Institute for the Science of Light, D-91058 Erlangen, Germany

Article Text (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand

References (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand
Issue

Vol. 81, Iss. 2 — February 2010

Reuse & Permissions
Access Options
Author publication services for translation and copyediting assistance advertisement

Authorization Required


×
×

Images

×

Sign up to receive regular email alerts from Physical Review A

Log In

Cancel
×

Search


Article Lookup

Paste a citation or DOI

Enter a citation
×