Perturbation theory analysis of attosecond photoionization

E. A. Pronin, Anthony F. Starace, M. V. Frolov, and N. L. Manakov
Phys. Rev. A 80, 063403 – Published 1 December 2009

Abstract

Ionization of an atom by a few-cycle attosecond xuv pulse is analyzed using perturbation theory (PT), keeping terms in the transition amplitude up to second order in the pulse electric field. Within the PT approach, we present an ab initio parametrization of the ionized electron angular distribution (AD) using rotational invariance and symmetry arguments. This parametrization gives analytically the dependence of the AD on the carrier envelope phase (CEP), the polarization of the pulse, and on the ionized electron momentum direction, p̂. For the general case of an elliptically polarized pulse, we show that interference of the first- and second-order transition amplitudes causes a CEP-dependent asymmetry (with respect to p̂p̂) and both elliptic and circular dichroism effects. All of these effects are maximal in the polarization plane and depend not only on the CEP but also on the phase of dynamical atomic parameters that enter our parametrization of the AD. Within the single active electron model of an atom, for an initial s or p state we define all dynamical parameters in terms of radial matrix elements (analytic expressions for which are given for the Coulomb and zero-range potentials). For ionization of the H atom by linearly polarized pulses, our PT results are in excellent agreement with results of numerical solutions of the time-dependent Schrödinger equation of Peng et al. [New J. Phys. 10, 025030 (2008)]. Also, our numerical results show that the asymmetries and dichroism effects at low electron energies have a different physical origin from those at high electron energies. Moreover, our results for Gaussian and cosine-squared pulse shapes are in good qualitative agreement. Finally, we show that our analytic formulas may prove useful for determining few-cycle extreme ultraviolet (xuv) pulse characteristics, such as the CEP and the polarization.

  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
4 More
  • Received 30 September 2009

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.80.063403

©2009 American Physical Society

Authors & Affiliations

E. A. Pronin and Anthony F. Starace

  • Department of Physics and Astronomy, The University of Nebraska, Lincoln, Nebraska 68588-0111, USA

M. V. Frolov and N. L. Manakov

  • Department of Physics, Voronezh State University, Voronezh 394006, Russia

Article Text (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand

References (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand
Issue

Vol. 80, Iss. 6 — December 2009

Reuse & Permissions
Access Options
Author publication services for translation and copyediting assistance advertisement

Authorization Required


×
×

Images

×

Sign up to receive regular email alerts from Physical Review A

Log In

Cancel
×

Search


Article Lookup

Paste a citation or DOI

Enter a citation
×