Misorientation-dependent solute enrichment at interfaces and its contribution to defect formation mechanisms during laser additive manufacturing of superalloys

Avinash Hariharan, Lin Lu, Jeroen Risse, Aleksander Kostka, Baptiste Gault, Eric A. Jägle, and Dierk Raabe
Phys. Rev. Materials 3, 123602 – Published 20 December 2019
PDFHTMLExport Citation

Abstract

A vital issue during selective laser melting of nonweldable polycrystalline nickel-base superalloys is the formation of microcracks. These are cracks occurring during the last stage of solidification and only at high angle grain boundaries (HAGBs). Solute enrichment to the remaining interdendritic liquid and its partial back-diffusion into the solid contributes to the crack nucleation mechanism. Here we use atom probe tomography coupled with transmission Kikuchi diffraction to determine the misorientation and chemical composition profiles across HAGBs (with and without cracks) and across crack-free low angle grain boundaries (LAGBs). The Gibbsian interfacial excess of solutes (mainly B, C, Si, and Zr) is at least two times higher at the HAGB compared to the LAGB. The chemical profiles show the opposite behavior to established model predictions of the last stage of solidification. Our diffusion calculations elucidate that the chemical profiles are influenced by both microsegregation (of Ti, Nb, and Si) during solidification and solid-state segregation (of B, C, and Zr) during cooling. The chemical profiles in the topmost layer indicate a negligible effect of remelting and reheating. Except for Ti-rich carbides, no secondary phases are found. Additionally, we study an alloy with a reduced content of Zr and Si (by at least 60 wt. %), relative to the standard IN738LC composition. We achieved a 99% reduction in crack length per unit area. However, the grain boundary enrichment of Zr and Si in the modified alloy was similar to the standard alloy. Based on these findings, we critically discuss the contribution of various mechanisms proposed for solidification cracking.

  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
7 More
  • Received 11 August 2019

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevMaterials.3.123602

©2019 American Physical Society

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Interdisciplinary Physics

Authors & Affiliations

Avinash Hariharan1,*, Lin Lu1, Jeroen Risse2,3, Aleksander Kostka4, Baptiste Gault1,5, Eric A. Jägle1, and Dierk Raabe1

  • 1Department of Microstructure Physics and Alloy Design, Max-Planck-Institut für Eisenforschung GmbH, Max-Planck-Straße 1, 40237 Düsseldorf, Germany
  • 2Fraunhofer-Institut für Lasertechnik ILT, Steinbachstraße 15, 52074 Aachen, Germany
  • 3Advanced Research and Development Additive Manufacturing, TRUMPF Laser- und Systemtechnik GmbH, Campus Boulevard 79, 52074 Aachen, Germany
  • 4Center for Interface Dominated Materials (ZGH), Ruhr- University Bochum, 44801 Bochum, Germany
  • 5Department of Materials, Royal School of Mines, Imperial College, London SW7 2AZ, England, United Kingdom

  • *Corresponding author: a.hariharan@mpie.de

Article Text (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand

Supplemental Material (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand

References (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand
Issue

Vol. 3, Iss. 12 — December 2019

Reuse & Permissions
Access Options
Author publication services for translation and copyediting assistance advertisement

Authorization Required


×
×

Images

×

Sign up to receive regular email alerts from Physical Review Materials

Log In

Cancel
×

Search


Article Lookup

Paste a citation or DOI

Enter a citation
×