Temperature-Dependent Decay of Quasi-Two-Dimensional Vortices across the BCS-BEC Crossover

Xiang-Pei Liu, Xing-Can Yao, Xiaopeng Li, Yu-Xuan Wang, Chun-Jiong Huang, Youjin Deng, Yu-Ao Chen, and Jian-Wei Pan
Phys. Rev. Lett. 129, 163602 – Published 13 October 2022
PDFHTMLExport Citation

Abstract

We systematically study the decay of quasi-two-dimensional vortices in an oblate strongly interacting Fermi gas over a wide interaction range and observe that, as the system temperature is lowered, the vortex lifetime increases in the Bose-Einstein condensate (BEC) regime but decreases at unitarity and in the Bardeen-Cooper-Schrieffer (BCS) regime. The observations can be qualitatively captured by a phenomenological model simply involving diffusion and two-body collisional loss, in which the vortex lifetime is mostly determined by the slower process of the two. In particular, the counterintuitive vortex decay in the BCS regime can be interpreted by considering the competition between the temperature dependence of the vortex annihilation rate and that of unpaired fermions. Our results suggest a competing mechanism for the complex vortex decay dynamics in the BCS-BEC crossover for the fermionic superfluids.

  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Received 9 November 2021
  • Revised 15 August 2022
  • Accepted 19 September 2022

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.129.163602

© 2022 American Physical Society

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Quantum Information, Science & TechnologyAtomic, Molecular & Optical

Authors & Affiliations

Xiang-Pei Liu1,2,3,*, Xing-Can Yao1,2,3,*, Xiaopeng Li4,5,*, Yu-Xuan Wang1,2,3, Chun-Jiong Huang6, Youjin Deng1,2,3,7, Yu-Ao Chen1,2,3, and Jian-Wei Pan1,2,3

  • 1Hefei National Research Center for Physical Sciences at the Microscale and School of Physical Sciences, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei 230026, China
  • 2Shanghai Research Center for Quantum Science and CAS Center for Excellence in Quantum Information and Quantum Physics, University of Science and Technology of China, Shanghai 201315, China
  • 3Hefei National Laboratory, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei 230088, China
  • 4State Key Laboratory of Surface Physics, Institute of Nanoelectronics and Quantum Computing, and Department of Physics, Fudan University, Shanghai 200433, China
  • 5Shanghai Qi Zhi Institute, AI Tower, Xuhui District, Shanghai 200232, China
  • 6Department of Physics and HKU-UCAS Joint Institute for Theoretical and Computational Physics at Hong Kong, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
  • 7MinJiang Collaborative Center for Theoretical Physics, College of Physics and Electronic Information Engineering, Minjiang University, Fuzhou 350108, China

  • *These authors contributed equally to this work.

Article Text (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand

Supplemental Material (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand

References (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand
Issue

Vol. 129, Iss. 16 — 14 October 2022

Reuse & Permissions
Access Options
Author publication services for translation and copyediting assistance advertisement

Authorization Required


×
×

Images

×

Sign up to receive regular email alerts from Physical Review Letters

Log In

Cancel
×

Search


Article Lookup

Paste a citation or DOI

Enter a citation
×