Abstract
By using a combined amplitude analysis of the and data, we demonstrate that the , which is quoted as a state in the Particle Data Group table, is favored by the data to be a state appearing in both channels, which means that the and the can be regarded as the same state. Meanwhile, the data also prefer a large helicity-0 contribution of this tensor resonance to the amplitudes instead of the helicity-2 dominance assumed by BABAR, which may indicate a sizable portion of non- components in this state. Identifying the with the and abandoning the helicity-2 dominance for this tensor state are helpful for the further understandings of the properties of this state and also of the mysterious “” charmoniumlike resonances.
- Received 12 January 2015
DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.115.022001
© 2015 American Physical Society