Large-scale flow and Reynolds numbers in the presence of boiling in locally heated turbulent convection

Paul B. J. Hoefnagels, Ping Wei, Daniela Narezo Guzman, Chao Sun, Detlef Lohse, and Guenter Ahlers
Phys. Rev. Fluids 2, 074604 – Published 27 July 2017

Abstract

We report on an experimental study of the large-scale flow (LSF) and Reynolds numbers in turbulent convection in a cylindrical sample with height equal to its diameter and heated locally around the center of its bottom plate (locally heated convection). The sample size and shape are the same as those of Narezo Guzman et al. [D. Narezo Guzman et al., J. Fluid Mech. 787, 331 (2015); D. Narezo Guzman et al., J. Fluid Mech. 795, 60 (2016)]. Measurements are made at a nearly constant Rayleigh number as a function of the mean temperature, both in the presence of controlled boiling (two-phase flow) and for the superheated fluid (one-phase flow). Superheat values TbTon up to about 11 K (Tb is the bottom-plate temperature and Ton is the lowest Tb at which boiling is observed) are used. The LSF is less organized than it is in (uniformly heated) Rayleigh-Bénard convection (RBC), where it takes the form of a single convection roll. Large-scale-flow-induced sinusoidal azimuthal temperature variations (like those found for RBC) could be detected only in the lower portion of the sample, indicating a less organized flow in the upper portions. Reynolds numbers are determined using the elliptic model (EM) of He and Zhang [G.-W. He and J.-B. Zhang, Phys. Rev. E 73, 055303(R) (2006)]. We found that for our system the EM is applicable over a wide range of space and time displacements, as long as these displacements are within the inertial range of the temporal and spatial spectrum. At three locations in the sample the results show that the vertical mean-flow velocity component is reduced while the fluctuation velocity is enhanced by the bubbles of the two-phase flow. Enhancements of velocity fluctuations up to about 60% are found at the largest superheat values. Local temperature measurements within the sample reveal temperature oscillations that also used to determine a Reynolds number. These results are generally consistent with the mean-flow EM results and show a two-phase-flow enhancement of up to about 30%.

  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
12 More
  • Received 9 December 2016

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevFluids.2.074604

©2017 American Physical Society

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Fluid Dynamics

Authors & Affiliations

Paul B. J. Hoefnagels1,2, Ping Wei3, Daniela Narezo Guzman1,2, Chao Sun1,4, Detlef Lohse1,5, and Guenter Ahlers2

  • 1Physics of Fluids Group, Department of Science and Technology, J.M. Burgers Center for Fluid Dynamics, Mesa+-Institute, and Max Planck Center Twente, University of Twente, P.O. Box 217, 7500 AE Enschede, The Netherlands
  • 2Department of Physics, University of California, Santa Barbara, CA 93106, USA
  • 3School of Aerospace Engineering and Applied Mechanics, Tongji University, Shanghai, China
  • 4Center for Combustion Energy and Department of Thermal Engineering, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China
  • 5Max Planck Institute for Dynamics and Self-Organization, Am Fassberg 17, 37077 Göttingen, Germany

Article Text (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand

References (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand
Issue

Vol. 2, Iss. 7 — July 2017

Reuse & Permissions
Access Options
CHORUS

Article Available via CHORUS

Download Accepted Manuscript
Author publication services for translation and copyediting assistance advertisement

Authorization Required


×
×

Images

×

Sign up to receive regular email alerts from Physical Review Fluids

Log In

Cancel
×

Search


Article Lookup

Paste a citation or DOI

Enter a citation
×