For many real-world networks only a small “sampled” version of the original network may be investigated; those results are then used to draw conclusions about the actual system. Variants of breadth-first search (BFS) sampling, which are based on epidemic processes, are widely used. Although it is well established that BFS sampling fails, in most cases, to capture the IN component(s) of directed networks, a description of the effects of BFS sampling on other topological properties is all but absent from the literature. To systematically study the effects of sampling biases on directed networks, we compare BFS sampling to random sampling on complete large-scale directed networks. We present new results and a thorough analysis of the topological properties of seven complete directed networks (prior to sampling), including three versions of Wikipedia, three different sources of sampled World Wide Web data, and an Internet-based social network. We detail the differences that sampling method and coverage can make to the structural properties of sampled versions of these seven networks. Most notably, we find that sampling method and coverage affect both the bow-tie structure and the number and structure of strongly connected components in sampled networks. In addition, at a low sampling coverage (i.e., less than 40$\%$), the values of average degree, variance of out-degree, degree autocorrelation, and link reciprocity are overestimated by 30$\%$ or more in BFS-sampled networks and only attain values within 10$\%$ of the corresponding values in the complete networks when sampling coverage is in excess of 65$\%$. These results may cause us to rethink what we know about the structure, function, and evolution of real-world directed networks.

• Received 5 August 2012

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.86.046104