Phase behavior of colloidal superballs: Shape interpolation from spheres to cubes

Robert D. Batten, Frank H. Stillinger, and Salvatore Torquato
Phys. Rev. E 81, 061105 – Published 2 June 2010

Abstract

The phase behavior of hard superballs is examined using molecular dynamics within a deformable periodic simulation box. A superball’s interior is defined by the inequality |x|2q+|y|2q+|z|2q1, which provides a versatile family of convex particles (q0.5) with cubelike and octahedronlike shapes as well as concave particles (q<0.5) with octahedronlike shapes. Here, we consider the convex case with a deformation parameter q between the sphere point (q=1) and the cube (q=). We find that the asphericity plays a significant role in the extent of cubatic ordering of both the liquid and crystal phases. Calculation of the first few virial coefficients shows that superballs that are visually similar to cubes can have low-density equations of state closer to spheres than to cubes. Dense liquids of superballs display cubatic orientational order that extends over several particle lengths only for large q. Along the ordered, high-density equation of state, superballs with 1<q<3 exhibit clear evidence of a phase transition from a crystal state to a state with reduced long-ranged orientational order upon the reduction of density. For q3, long-ranged orientational order persists until the melting transition. The width of the apparent coexistence region between the liquid and ordered, high-density phase decreases with q up to q=4.0. The structures of the high-density phases are examined using certain order parameters, distribution functions, and orientational correlation functions. We also find that a fixed simulation cell induces artificial phase transitions that are out of equilibrium. Current fabrication techniques allow for the synthesis of colloidal superballs and thus the phase behavior of such systems can be investigated experimentally.

  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
7 More
  • Received 10 January 2010

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.81.061105

©2010 American Physical Society

Authors & Affiliations

Robert D. Batten1, Frank H. Stillinger2, and Salvatore Torquato2,3,4,5,6,7,*

  • 1Department of Chemical Engineering, Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey 08544, USA
  • 2Department of Chemistry, Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey 08544, USA
  • 3Department of Physics, Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey 08544, USA
  • 4Princeton Center for Theoretical Science, Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey 08544, USA
  • 5Princeton Institute for the Science and Technology of Materials, Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey 08544, USA
  • 6Program in Applied and Computational Mathematics, Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey 08544, USA
  • 7School of Natural Sciences, Institute for Advanced Study, Princeton, New Jersey 08544, USA

  • *Corresponding author; torquato@electron.princeton.edu

Article Text (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand

References (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand
Issue

Vol. 81, Iss. 6 — June 2010

Reuse & Permissions
Access Options
Author publication services for translation and copyediting assistance advertisement

Authorization Required


×
×

Images

×

Sign up to receive regular email alerts from Physical Review E

Log In

Cancel
×

Search


Article Lookup

Paste a citation or DOI

Enter a citation
×