Final results of the Aurora experiment to study 2β decay of Cd116 with enriched Cd116WO4 crystal scintillators

A. S. Barabash, P. Belli, R. Bernabei, F. Cappella, V. Caracciolo, R. Cerulli, D. M. Chernyak, F. A. Danevich, S. d’Angelo, A. Incicchitti, D. V. Kasperovych, V. V. Kobychev, S. I. Konovalov, M. Laubenstein, D. V. Poda, O. G. Polischuk, V. N. Shlegel, V. I. Tretyak, V. I. Umatov, and Ya. V. Vasiliev
Phys. Rev. D 98, 092007 – Published 12 November 2018

Abstract

The double-beta decay of Cd116 has been investigated with the help of radiopure enriched Cd116WO4 crystal scintillators (mass of 1.162 kg) at the Gran Sasso underground laboratory. The half-life of Cd116 relative to the 2ν2β decay to the ground state of Sn116 was measured with the highest up-to-date accuracy as T1/2=(2.630.12+0.11)×1019yr. A new improved limit on the 0ν2β decay of Cd116 to the ground state of Sn116 was set as T1/22.2×1023yr at 90% C.L., which is the most stringent known restriction for this isotope. It corresponds to the effective Majorana neutrino mass limit in the range mν(1.01.7)eV, depending on the nuclear matrix elements used in the estimations. New improved half-life limits for the 0ν2β decay with majoron(s) emission, Lorentz-violating 2ν2β decay, and 2β transitions to excited states of Sn116 were set at the level of T1/210201022yr. New limits for the hypothetical lepton-number violating parameters (right-handed currents admixtures in weak interaction, the effective majoron-neutrino coupling constants, R-parity violating parameter, Lorentz-violating parameter, heavy neutrino mass) were set.

  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
10 More
  • Received 23 July 2018

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.98.092007

© 2018 American Physical Society

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Nuclear PhysicsParticles & Fields

Authors & Affiliations

A. S. Barabash1, P. Belli2,3, R. Bernabei2,3,*, F. Cappella4, V. Caracciolo5, R. Cerulli2,3, D. M. Chernyak6,7, F. A. Danevich6, S. d’Angelo2,3,†, A. Incicchitti4,8, D. V. Kasperovych6, V. V. Kobychev6, S. I. Konovalov1, M. Laubenstein5, D. V. Poda6,9, O. G. Polischuk6, V. N. Shlegel10, V. I. Tretyak6, V. I. Umatov1, and Ya. V. Vasiliev10

  • 1National Research Centre “Kurchatov Institute,” Institute of Theoretical and Experimental Physics, 117218 Moscow, Russia
  • 2INFN, sezione di Roma “Tor Vergata”, I-00133 Rome, Italy
  • 3Dipartimento di Fisica, Università di Roma “Tor Vergata”, I-00133 Rome, Italy
  • 4INFN, sezione di Roma, I-00185 Rome, Italy
  • 5INFN, Laboratori Nazionali del Gran Sasso, I-67100 Assergi (AQ), Italy
  • 6Institute for Nuclear Research, 03028 Kyiv, Ukraine
  • 7Kavli Institute for the Physics and Mathematics of the Universe, University of Tokyo, Kashiwa, 277-8583, Japan
  • 8Dipartimento di Fisica, Università di Roma “La Sapienza”, I-00185 Rome, Italy
  • 9CSNSM, Univ. Paris-Sud, CNRS/IN2P3, Université Paris-Saclay, 91405 Orsay, France
  • 10Nikolaev Institute of Inorganic Chemistry, 630090 Novosibirsk, Russia

  • *Corresponding author. rita.bernabei@roma2.infn.it
  • Deceased.

Article Text (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand

References (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand
Issue

Vol. 98, Iss. 9 — 1 November 2018

Reuse & Permissions
Access Options
Author publication services for translation and copyediting assistance advertisement

Authorization Required


×
×

Images

×

Sign up to receive regular email alerts from Physical Review D

Log In

Cancel
×

Search


Article Lookup

Paste a citation or DOI

Enter a citation
×