Reply to “Comment on ‘Atomic gravitational wave interferometric sensor’ ”

Savas Dimopoulos, Peter W. Graham, Jason M. Hogan, Mark A. Kasevich, and Surjeet Rajendran
Phys. Rev. D 84, 028102 – Published 27 July 2011

Abstract

Contrary to the claims of P. Bender [preceding Comment, Phys. Rev. D 84, 028101 (2011).], we show that the effects discussed therein do not impose significant constraints on the design of atomic interferometer gravity wave detectors. These higher-order effects are subordinate to backgrounds discussed in S. Dimopoulos, et al. [Phys. Rev. D 78, 122002 (2008).], and can be mitigated with straightforward design approaches.

  • Received 26 April 2011

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.84.028102

© 2011 American Physical Society

Authors & Affiliations

Savas Dimopoulos, Peter W. Graham, Jason M. Hogan, Mark A. Kasevich*, and Surjeet Rajendran

  • Department of Physics, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305-4060, USA

  • *kasevich@stanford.edu

Comments & Replies

Comment on “Atomic gravitational wave interferometric sensor”

Peter L. Bender
Phys. Rev. D 84, 028101 (2011)

Article Text (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand

Original Article

Atomic gravitational wave interferometric sensor

Savas Dimopoulos, Peter W. Graham, Jason M. Hogan, Mark A. Kasevich, and Surjeet Rajendran
Phys. Rev. D 78, 122002 (2008)

References (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand
Issue

Vol. 84, Iss. 2 — 15 July 2011

Reuse & Permissions
Access Options
Author publication services for translation and copyediting assistance advertisement

Authorization Required


×
×

Images

×

Sign up to receive regular email alerts from Physical Review D

Log In

Cancel
×

Search


Article Lookup

Paste a citation or DOI

Enter a citation
×