β decay of V61,63 and low-energy level schemes of Cr61,63

S. Suchyta, S. N. Liddick, C. J. Chiara, W. B. Walters, M. P. Carpenter, H. L. Crawford, G. F. Grinyer, G. Gürdal, A. Klose, E. A. McCutchan, J. Pereira, and S. Zhu
Phys. Rev. C 89, 034317 – Published 21 March 2014

Abstract

Background: Near N = 40, rapid development of collectivity has been inferred based on the low-energy level schemes of the even-even Fe and Cr isotopes and attributed to deformation arising primarily from the influence of the νg9/2 intruder orbital. The level schemes of the odd-A Co and Fe isotopes, as well as the odd-odd Co and Mn isotopes, are also influenced by the g9/2 orbital and suggest prolate deformation. However, scarce information is available regarding the neutron-rich odd-A Cr isotopes.

Purpose: Determine low-energy level schemes of the neutron-rich Cr isotopes approaching N = 40 and investigate the influence of the νg9/2 orbital.

Method: Neutron-rich V isotopes were produced at the NSCL through projectile fragmentation. The β decay of the V isotopes into Cr isotopes was studied, and the observed β-delayed γ rays were used to determine the low-energy level schemes of the neutron-rich Cr isotopes.

Results: A greatly expanded level scheme is constructed for Cr61, which has an increased low-energy level density relative to isotopic 55,57,59Cr. Excited states are discovered in Cr63 for the first time.

Conclusion: The distinct difference between the low-energy level scheme of Cr61 and the lighter neutron-rich odd-A Cr isotopes is inferred to be due to the influence of the νg9/2 intruder orbital and suggests the possibility of low-energy positive-parity states in Cr61, leading to the conclusion that a significant change in deformation and orbital occupancies has taken place when N exceeds 36.

  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
1 More
  • Received 10 May 2013
  • Revised 21 January 2014

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.89.034317

©2014 American Physical Society

Authors & Affiliations

S. Suchyta1,2, S. N. Liddick1,2, C. J. Chiara3,4, W. B. Walters3, M. P. Carpenter4, H. L. Crawford5,*, G. F. Grinyer6, G. Gürdal7,†, A. Klose1,2,‡, E. A. McCutchan4,§, J. Pereira1, and S. Zhu4

  • 1National Superconducting Cyclotron Laboratory (NSCL), Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan 48824, USA
  • 2Department of Chemistry, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan 48824, USA
  • 3Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland 20742, USA
  • 4Physics Division, Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne, Illinois 60439, USA
  • 5Nuclear Science Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, California 94720, USA
  • 6Grand Accélérateur National d'Ions Lourds (GANIL), CEA/DSM-CNRS/IN2P3, Bvd Henri Becquerel, 14076 Caen, France
  • 7Nuclear Engineering Division, Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne, Illinois 60439, USA

  • *Present Address: Department of Physics and Astronomy, Ohio University, Athens, Ohio 45701.
  • Present Address: Physics Department, Millsaps College, Jackson, Mississippi 39210.
  • Present Address: National Institute of Standards and Technology, Boulder, Colorado 80305.
  • §Present Address: National Nuclear Data Center, Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, New York 11973-5000.

Article Text (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand

References (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand
Issue

Vol. 89, Iss. 3 — March 2014

Reuse & Permissions
Access Options
Author publication services for translation and copyediting assistance advertisement

Authorization Required


×
×

Images

×

Sign up to receive regular email alerts from Physical Review C

Log In

Cancel
×

Search


Article Lookup

Paste a citation or DOI

Enter a citation
×