Spectroscopic study of the 64,66,68Ni isotopes populated in 64Ni + 238U collisions

R. Broda, T. Pawłat, W. Królas, R. V. F. Janssens, S. Zhu, W. B. Walters, B. Fornal, C. J. Chiara, M. P. Carpenter, N. Hoteling, Ł. W. Iskra, F. G. Kondev, T. Lauritsen, D. Seweryniak, I. Stefanescu, X. Wang, and J. Wrzesiński
Phys. Rev. C 86, 064312 – Published 12 December 2012

Abstract

Excited states in 64Ni, 66Ni, and 68Ni were populated in quasielastic and deep-inelastic reactions of a 430-MeV 64Ni beam on a thick 238U target. Level schemes including many nonyrast states were established up to respective excitation energies of 6.8, 8.2, and 7.8 MeV on the basis of γ-ray coincidence events measured with the Gammasphere array. Spin-parity assignments were deduced from an angular-correlation analysis and from observed γ-decay patterns, but information from earlier γ-spectroscopy and nuclear-reaction studies was used as well. The spin assignments for nonyrast states were supported further by their observed population pattern in quasielastic reactions selected through a cross-coincidence technique. Previously established isomeric-state decays in 66Ni and 68Ni were verified and delineated more extensively through a delayed-coincidence analysis. A number of new states located above these long-lived states were identified. Shell-model calculations were carried out in the p3/2f5/2p1/2g9/2 model space with two effective interactions using a 56Ni core. Satisfactory agreement between experimental and computed level energies was achieved, even though the calculations indicate that all the states are associated with rather complex configurations. This complexity is illustrated through the discussion of the structure of the negative-parity states and of the M1 decays between them. The best agreement between data and calculations was achieved for 68Ni, the nucleus where the calculated states have the simplest structure. In this nucleus, the existence of two low-spin states reported recently was confirmed as well. Results of the present study do not indicate any involvement of collective degrees of freedom and confirm the validity of a shell-model description in terms of neutron excitations combined with a closed Z = 28 proton shell. Further improvements to the calculations are desirable.

  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
8 More
  • Received 5 October 2012

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.86.064312

©2012 American Physical Society

Authors & Affiliations

R. Broda1, T. Pawłat1, W. Królas1, R. V. F. Janssens2, S. Zhu2, W. B. Walters3, B. Fornal1, C. J. Chiara2,3, M. P. Carpenter2, N. Hoteling3, Ł. W. Iskra1, F. G. Kondev4, T. Lauritsen2, D. Seweryniak2, I. Stefanescu2,3, X. Wang2, and J. Wrzesiński1

  • 1The H. Niewodniczanski Institute of Nuclear Physics PAN, PL-31342 Kraków, Poland
  • 2Physics Division, Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne, Illinois 60439, USA
  • 3Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland 20742, USA
  • 4Nuclear Engineering Division, Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne, Illinois 60439, USA

Article Text (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand

References (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand
Issue

Vol. 86, Iss. 6 — December 2012

Reuse & Permissions
Access Options
Author publication services for translation and copyediting assistance advertisement

Authorization Required


×
×

Images

×

Sign up to receive regular email alerts from Physical Review C

Log In

Cancel
×

Search


Article Lookup

Paste a citation or DOI

Enter a citation
×