Effects of the entrance channel and fission barrier in the synthesis of superheavy element Z=120

A. K. Nasirov, G. Mandaglio, G. Giardina, A. Sobiczewski, and A. I. Muminov
Phys. Rev. C 84, 044612 – Published 19 October 2011

Abstract

The fusion and evaporation residue cross sections for the 50Ti+249Cf and 54Cr+248Cm reactions calculated by the combined dinuclear system and advanced statistical models are compared. These reactions are considered to be used to synthesize the heaviest superheavy element. The 50Ti+249Cf reaction is more mass asymmetric than 54Cr+248Cm, and the fusion excitation function for the former reaction is higher than the one for the latter reaction. The evaporation residue excitation functions for the mass asymmetric reaction is higher in comparison with the one for the 54Cr+248Cm reaction. The use of the mass values of superheavy nuclei calculated in the framework of the macroscopic-microscopic model by the Warsaw Group [Muntian, Z. Patyk, and A. Sobiczewski, Phys. At. Nuclei 66, 1015 (2003)] leads to a smaller evaporation residue cross section for both the reactions in comparison with the case of using the masses calculated by Möller and Nix [J. Phys. G: Nucl. Part. Phys. 20, 1681 (1994)]. The 50Ti+249Cf reaction is more favorable in comparison with the 54Cr+248Cm reaction: the maximum values of the excitation function of the 3n channel of the evaporation residue formation for the 50Ti+249Cf and 54Cr+248Cm reactions are about 0.1 and 0.07 pb, respectively, but the yield of the 4n channel for the former reaction is lower (0.004 pb) in comparison with the one (0.01 pb) for the latter reaction.

  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
3 More
  • Received 8 September 2011

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.84.044612

©2011 American Physical Society

Authors & Affiliations

A. K. Nasirov1,2, G. Mandaglio3,4, G. Giardina3,4, A. Sobiczewski5, and A. I. Muminov2

  • 1Joint Institute for Nuclear Research, Joliot-Curie 6, Dubna 141980, Russia
  • 2Institute of Nuclear Physics, Ulugbek, 100214 Tashkent, Uzbekistan
  • 3Dipartimento di Fisica dell’ Università di Messina, Salita Sperone 31, 98166 Messina, Italy
  • 4Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare, Sezione di Catania, Via S. Sofia, 64, 95123 Catania, Italy
  • 5Soltan Institute for Nuclear Studies, Hoza 69, PL-00-681 Warsaw, Poland

Article Text (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand

References (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand
Issue

Vol. 84, Iss. 4 — October 2011

Reuse & Permissions
Access Options
Author publication services for translation and copyediting assistance advertisement

Authorization Required


×
×

Images

×

Sign up to receive regular email alerts from Physical Review C

Log In

Cancel
×

Search


Article Lookup

Paste a citation or DOI

Enter a citation
×