Cluster radioactivity preformation probability of trans-lead nuclei in the NpNn scheme

Lin-Jing Qi, Dong-Meng Zhang, Song Luo, Gui-Qing Zhang, Peng-Cheng Chu, Xi-Jun Wu, and Xiao-Hua Li
Phys. Rev. C 108, 014325 – Published 25 July 2023

Abstract

In the present work, the cluster radioactivity preformation probability Pc in the scheme of NpNn for the effective number of the valence particles (holes) in trans-lead nuclei has been systematically investigated. This quantity has been explored in the simplified parametrization of NpNn as well as the multiplication NpNnI of this product with the isospin asymmetry I. The calculations for Pc are both performed in microscopic and model-dependent way. Within the microscopic approach, based on our previous work [Chin. Phys. C 47, 014101 (2023)], Pc is calculated in cluster formation model combined with the exponential relationship of Pc to the α decay preformation probability Pα when the mass number of the emitted cluster Ac 28. While Ac 28, Pc is obtained through the charge-number dependence of Pc on the decay products proposed by Ren et al. [Phys. Rev. C 70, 034304 (2004)]. In the model-dependent approach, Pc is extracted through the ratios from calculated cluster radioactivity half-lives in the framework of unified fission model proposed by Dong et al. [Eur. Phys. J. A 41, 197 (2009)] to experimental ones. Both of the results show Pc in logarithmic form are linear to NpNn as well as NpNnI. For comparison, the parent-mass-number dependence analytical formula as well as the model proposed by Wei and Zhang [Phys. Rev. C 96, 021601(R) (2017)] are also used. Furthermore, the preformation mechanic for cluster radioactivity has also been discussed.

  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Received 21 April 2023
  • Revised 18 June 2023
  • Accepted 11 July 2023

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.108.014325

©2023 American Physical Society

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Nuclear Physics

Authors & Affiliations

Lin-Jing Qi1, Dong-Meng Zhang1, Song Luo1, Gui-Qing Zhang2,*, Peng-Cheng Chu3,†, Xi-Jun Wu4,‡, and Xiao-Hua Li1,5,6,§

  • 1School of Nuclear Science and Technology, University of South China, 421001 Hengyang, People's Republic of China
  • 2College of Science, University of Science and Technology, 300457 Tianjin, People's Republic of China
  • 3The Research Center for Theoretical Physics, Science School, Qingdao University of Technology, Qingdao 266033, People's Republic of China
  • 4School of Math and Physics, University of South China, Hengyang 421001, People's Republic of China
  • 5Cooperative Innovation Center for Nuclear Fuel Cycle Technology and Equipment, University of South China, 421001 Hengyang, People's Republic of China
  • 6National Exemplary Base for International Science and Technology Collaboration of Nuclear Energy and Nuclear Safety, University of South China, Hengyang 421001, People's Republic of China

  • *nkzhanggq@tust.edu.cn
  • kyois@126.com
  • wuxijunusc@163.com
  • §lixiaohuaphysics@126.com

Article Text (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand

References (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand
Issue

Vol. 108, Iss. 1 — July 2023

Reuse & Permissions
Access Options
Author publication services for translation and copyediting assistance advertisement

Authorization Required


×
×

Images

×

Sign up to receive regular email alerts from Physical Review C

Log In

Cancel
×

Search


Article Lookup

Paste a citation or DOI

Enter a citation
×