Substitution of Ni for Fe in superconducting Fe0.98Te0.5Se0.5 depresses the normal-state conductivity but not the magnetic spectral weight

Jinghui Wang, Ruidan Zhong, Shichao Li, Yuan Gan, Zhijun Xu, Cheng Zhang, T. Ozaki, M. Matsuda, Yang Zhao, Qiang Li, Guangyong Xu, Genda Gu, J. M. Tranquada, R. J. Birgeneau, and Jinsheng Wen
Phys. Rev. B 91, 014501 – Published 5 January 2015

Abstract

We have performed systematic resistivity and inelastic neutron scattering measurements on Fe0.98zNizTe0.5Se0.5 samples to study the impact of Ni substitution on the transport properties and the low-energy (12meV) magnetic excitations. It is found that, with increasing Ni doping, both the conductivity and superconductivity are gradually suppressed; in contrast, the low-energy magnetic spectral weight changes little. Comparing with the impact of Co and Cu substitution, we find that the effects on conductivity and superconductivity for the same degree of substitution grow systematically as the atomic number of the substituent deviates from that of Fe. The impact of the substituents as scattering centers appears to be greater than any contribution to carrier concentration. The fact that low-energy magnetic spectral weight is not reduced by increased electron scattering indicates that the existence of antiferromagnetic correlations does not depend on electronic states close to the Fermi energy.

  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Received 8 December 2014
  • Revised 22 December 2014

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.91.014501

©2015 American Physical Society

Authors & Affiliations

Jinghui Wang1,*, Ruidan Zhong2,3,*, Shichao Li1, Yuan Gan1, Zhijun Xu4,5, Cheng Zhang2,3, T. Ozaki2, M. Matsuda6, Yang Zhao7,8, Qiang Li2, Guangyong Xu2, Genda Gu2, J. M. Tranquada2, R. J. Birgeneau4,5, and Jinsheng Wen1,†

  • 1Center for Superconducting Physics and Materials, National Laboratory of Solid State Microstructures, Department of Physics, and Collaborative Innovation Center of Advanced Microstructures, Nanjing University, Nanjing 210093, China
  • 2Condensed Matter Physics and Materials Science Department, Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, New York 11973, USA
  • 3Materials Science and Engineering Department, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, New York 11794, USA
  • 4Physics Department, University of California, Berkeley, California 94720, USA
  • 5Materials Science Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, California 94720, USA
  • 6Quantum Condensed Matter Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37831, USA
  • 7NIST Center for Neutron Research, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, Maryland 20899, USA
  • 8Department of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland 20742, USA

  • *These authors contributed equally to the work.
  • jwen@nju.edu.cn

Article Text (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand

References (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand
Issue

Vol. 91, Iss. 1 — 1 January 2015

Reuse & Permissions
Access Options
CHORUS

Article Available via CHORUS

Download Accepted Manuscript
Author publication services for translation and copyediting assistance advertisement

Authorization Required


×
×

Images

×

Sign up to receive regular email alerts from Physical Review B

Log In

Cancel
×

Search


Article Lookup

Paste a citation or DOI

Enter a citation
×