Reply to “Comment on ‘Quantum phase transition in the four-spin exchange antiferromagnet’ ”

Valeri N. Kotov, D. X. Yao, A. H. Castro Neto, and D. K. Campbell
Phys. Rev. B 82, 136402 – Published 7 October 2010

Abstract

We argue that the analysis of the JQ model, presented in Kotov et al. [Phys. Rev. B 80, 174403 (2009)] and based on a field-theory description of coupled dimers, captures properly the strong quantum fluctuations tendencies, and the objections outlined in Isaev et al. [preceding Comment, Phys. Rev. B 82, 136401 (2010)] are misplaced.

  • Received 1 September 2010

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.82.136402

©2010 American Physical Society

Authors & Affiliations

Valeri N. Kotov

  • Department of Physics, University of Vermont, 82 University Place, Burlington, Vermont 05405, USA

D. X. Yao, A. H. Castro Neto, and D. K. Campbell

  • Department of Physics, Boston University, 590 Commonwealth Avenue, Boston, Massachusetts 02215, USA

Comments & Replies

Comment on “Quantum phase transition in the four-spin exchange antiferromagnet”

L. Isaev, G. Ortiz, and J. Dukelsky
Phys. Rev. B 82, 136401 (2010)

Article Text (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand

Original Article

Quantum phase transition in the four-spin exchange antiferromagnet

Valeri N. Kotov, Dao-Xin Yao, A. H. Castro Neto, and D. K. Campbell
Phys. Rev. B 80, 174403 (2009)

References (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand
Issue

Vol. 82, Iss. 13 — 1 October 2010

Reuse & Permissions
Access Options
Author publication services for translation and copyediting assistance advertisement

Authorization Required


×
×

Images

×

Sign up to receive regular email alerts from Physical Review B

Log In

Cancel
×

Search


Article Lookup

Paste a citation or DOI

Enter a citation
×