Inhomogeneous superconductivity in LuxZr1xB12 dodecaborides with dynamic charge stripes

A. Azarevich, A. Bogach, V. Glushkov, S. Demishev, A. Khoroshilov, K. Krasikov, V. Voronov, N. Shitsevalova, V. Filipov, S. Gabáni, K. Flachbart, A. Kuznetsov, S. Gavrilkin, K. Mitsen, S. J. Blundell, and N. E. Sluchanko
Phys. Rev. B 103, 104515 – Published 25 March 2021
PDFHTMLExport Citation

Abstract

We have studied the normal and superconductive state characteristics (resistivity, Hall coefficient, heat capacity, and magnetization) of model strongly correlated electronic systems LuxZr1xB12 with cooperative Jahn-Teller instability of the boron rigid cage and with dynamic charge stripes. It was found that these metals are s-wave dirty limit superconductors with a small mean free path of charge carriers l=5140Å and with a Cooper pair size changing nonmonotonously in the range 450–4000 Å. The parent ZrB12 and LuB12 borides are type-I superconductors, and Zr to Lu substitution induces a type-I to type-II phase transition providing a variation of the Ginzburg-Landau-Maki parameter in the limits 0.65κ1,26. We argue in favor of the two-band scenario of superconductivity in LuxZr1xB12 with gap values Δ114K and Δ268K, with pairing corresponding to strong coupling limit (λe-ph1) in the upper band, and to weak coupling (λe-ph0.10.4) in the lower one. A pseudogap Δps-gap60110K is observed in LuxZr1xB12 above Tc. We discuss also the possibility of anisotropic single-band superconductivity with stripe-induced both pair breaking and anisotropy, and analyze the origin of a unique enhanced surface superconductivity detected in these model compounds.

  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
5 More
  • Received 21 December 2020
  • Revised 1 March 2021
  • Accepted 9 March 2021

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.103.104515

©2021 American Physical Society

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Condensed Matter, Materials & Applied Physics

Authors & Affiliations

A. Azarevich1, A. Bogach1, V. Glushkov1, S. Demishev1, A. Khoroshilov1, K. Krasikov1, V. Voronov1, N. Shitsevalova2, V. Filipov2, S. Gabáni3, K. Flachbart3, A. Kuznetsov4, S. Gavrilkin5, K. Mitsen5, S. J. Blundell6, and N. E. Sluchanko1

  • 1Prokhorov General Physics Institute of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Vavilov str. 38, Moscow 119991, Russia
  • 2Frantsevich Institute for Problems of Materials Science, National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, 03680 Kyiv, Ukraine
  • 3Institute of Experimental Physics of the Slovak Academy of Sciences, Watsonova 47, 04001 Košice, Slovakia
  • 4National Research Nuclear University MEPhI, 31, Kashirskoe Shosse, 115409 Moscow, Russia
  • 5Lebedev Physical Institute of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 53 Leninskiy Avenue, 119991 Moscow, Russia
  • 6Department of Physics, University of Oxford, Clarendon Laboratory, Parks Road, Oxford OX1 3PU, United Kingdom

Article Text (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand

Supplemental Material (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand

References (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand
Issue

Vol. 103, Iss. 10 — 1 March 2021

Reuse & Permissions
Access Options
Author publication services for translation and copyediting assistance advertisement

Authorization Required


×
×

Images

×

Sign up to receive regular email alerts from Physical Review B

Log In

Cancel
×

Search


Article Lookup

Paste a citation or DOI

Enter a citation
×