Large Deformations of a Soft Porous Material

Christopher W. MacMinn, Eric R. Dufresne, and John S. Wettlaufer
Phys. Rev. Applied 5, 044020 – Published 29 April 2016
PDFHTMLExport Citation

Abstract

Compressing a porous material will decrease the volume of the pore space, driving fluid out. Similarly, injecting fluid into a porous material can expand the pore space, distorting the solid skeleton. This poromechanical coupling has applications ranging from cell and tissue mechanics to geomechanics and hydrogeology. The classical theory of linear poroelasticity captures this coupling by combining Darcy’s law with Terzaghi’s effective stress and linear elasticity in a linearized kinematic framework. Linear poroelasticity is a good model for very small deformations, but it becomes increasingly inappropriate for moderate to large deformations, which are common in the context of phenomena such as swelling and damage, and for soft materials such as gels and tissues. The well-known theory of large-deformation poroelasticity combines Darcy’s law with Terzaghi’s effective stress and nonlinear elasticity in a rigorous kinematic framework. This theory has been used extensively in biomechanics to model large elastic deformations in soft tissues and in geomechanics to model large elastoplastic deformations in soils. Here, we first provide an overview and discussion of this theory with an emphasis on the physics of poromechanical coupling. We present the large-deformation theory in an Eulerian framework to minimize the mathematical complexity, and we show how this nonlinear theory simplifies to linear poroelasticity under the assumption of small strain. We then compare the predictions of linear poroelasticity with those of large-deformation poroelasticity in the context of two uniaxial model problems: fluid outflow driven by an applied mechanical load (the consolidation problem) and compression driven by a steady fluid throughflow. We explore the steady and dynamical errors associated with the linear model in both situations, as well as the impact of introducing a deformation-dependent permeability. We show that the error in linear poroelasticity is due primarily to kinematic nonlinearity and that this error (i) plays a surprisingly important role in the dynamics of the deformation and (ii) is amplified by nonlinear constitutive behavior, such as deformation-dependent permeability.

  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
4 More
  • Received 14 October 2015

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevApplied.5.044020

© 2016 American Physical Society

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

  1. Physical Systems
Fluid Dynamics

Authors & Affiliations

Christopher W. MacMinn1,*, Eric R. Dufresne2, and John S. Wettlaufer3,4,5

  • 1Department of Engineering Science, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 3PJ, United Kingdom
  • 2Department of Materials, ETH Zurich, CH-8093 Zurich, Switzerland
  • 3Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut 06520, USA
  • 4The Mathematical Institute, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 3LB, United Kingdom
  • 5Nordita, Royal Institute of Technology and Stockholm University, SE-10691 Stockholm, Sweden

  • *christopher.macminn@eng.ox.ac.uk

Article Text (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand

Supplemental Material (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand

References (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand
Issue

Vol. 5, Iss. 4 — April 2016

Subject Areas
Reuse & Permissions
Access Options
CHORUS

Article Available via CHORUS

Download Accepted Manuscript
Author publication services for translation and copyediting assistance advertisement

Authorization Required


×
×

Images

×

Sign up to receive regular email alerts from Physical Review Applied

Log In

Cancel
×

Search


Article Lookup

Paste a citation or DOI

Enter a citation
×