Genome-wide reconstitution of chromatin transactions reveals that RSC preferentially disrupts H2AZ-containing nucleosomes

  1. Jesper Q. Svejstrup3
  1. 1Bioinformatics and Computational Biology Laboratory, The Francis Crick Institute, London NW1 1AT, United Kingdom;
  2. 2Department of Oncological Sciences, Huntsman Cancer Institute, and Howard Hughes Medical Institute, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah 84112, USA;
  3. 3Mechanisms of Transcription Laboratory, The Francis Crick Institute, London NW1 1AT, United Kingdom;
  4. 4UCL Genetics Institute, Department of Genetics, Evolution and Environment, University College London, London WC1E 6BT, United Kingdom
  • Corresponding authors: nicholas.luscombe{at}crick.ac.uk, jesper.svejstrup{at}crick.ac.uk
  • Abstract

    Chromatin transactions are typically studied in vivo, or in vitro using artificial chromatin lacking the epigenetic complexity of the natural material. Attempting to bridge the gap between these approaches, we established a system for isolating the yeast genome as a library of mononucleosomes harboring the natural epigenetic signature, suitable for biochemical manipulation. Combined with deep sequencing, this library was used to investigate the stability of individual nucleosomes and, as proof of principle, the nucleosome preference of the chromatin remodeling complex, RSC. This approach uncovered a distinct preference of RSC for nucleosomes derived from regions with a high density of histone variant H2AZ, and this preference is indeed markedly diminished using nucleosomes from cells lacking H2AZ. The preference for H2AZ remodeling/nucleosome ejection can also be reconstituted with recombinant nucleosome arrays. Together, our data indicate that, despite being separated from their genomic context, individual nucleosomes can retain their original identity as promoter- or transcription start site (TSS)-nucleosomes. Besides shedding new light on substrate preference of the chromatin remodeler RSC, the simple experimental system outlined here should be generally applicable to the study of chromatin transactions.

    Footnotes

    • [Supplemental material is available for this article.]

    • Article published online before print. Article, supplemental material, and publication date are at http://www.genome.org/cgi/doi/10.1101/gr.243139.118.

    • Freely available online through the Genome Research Open Access option.

    • Received August 17, 2018.
    • Accepted May 8, 2019.

    This article, published in Genome Research, is available under a Creative Commons License (Attribution 4.0 International), as described at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

    | Table of Contents
    OPEN ACCESS ARTICLE

    Preprint Server