Somatic neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) inactivation characterizes NF1-associated pilocytic astrocytoma

  1. Elaine R. Mardis2,3,4,7
  1. 1Department of Neurology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri 63110, USA;
  2. 2Alvin J. Siteman Cancer Center, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri 63110, USA;
  3. 3The Genome Institute at Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri 63110, USA;
  4. 4Department of Genetics, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri 63110, USA;
  5. 5Division of Neurosurgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri 63110, USA;
  6. 6Department of Neurosurgery, University of Toronto, Labatt Brain Tumor Centre, Toronto, Canada M5G 1X8

    Abstract

    Low-grade brain tumors (pilocytic astrocytomas) arising in the neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) inherited cancer predisposition syndrome are hypothesized to result from a combination of germline and acquired somatic NF1 tumor suppressor gene mutations. However, genetically engineered mice (GEM) in which mono-allelic germline Nf1 gene loss is coupled with bi-allelic somatic (glial progenitor cell) Nf1 gene inactivation develop brain tumors that do not fully recapitulate the neuropathological features of the human condition. These observations raise the intriguing possibility that, while loss of neurofibromin function is necessary for NF1-associated low-grade astrocytoma development, additional genetic changes may be required for full penetrance of the human brain tumor phenotype. To identify these potential cooperating genetic mutations, we performed whole-genome sequencing (WGS) analysis of three NF1-associated pilocytic astrocytoma (PA) tumors. We found that the mechanism of somatic NF1 loss was different in each tumor (frameshift mutation, loss of heterozygosity, and methylation). In addition, tumor purity analysis revealed that these tumors had a high proportion of stromal cells, such that only 50%–60% of cells in the tumor mass exhibited somatic NF1 loss. Importantly, we identified no additional recurrent pathogenic somatic mutations, supporting a model in which neuroglial progenitor cell NF1 loss is likely sufficient for PA formation in cooperation with a proper stromal environment.

    Footnotes

    • 7 Corresponding authors

      E-mail gutmannd{at}neuro.wustl.edu

      E-mail emardis{at}wustl.edu

    • [Supplemental material is available for this article.]

    • Article published online before print. Article, supplemental material, and publication date are at http://www.genome.org/cgi/doi/10.1101/gr.142604.112.

    • Received May 7, 2012.
    • Accepted November 26, 2012.

    This article is distributed exclusively by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press for the first six months after the full-issue publication date (see http://genome.cshlp.org/site/misc/terms.xhtml). After six months, it is available under a Creative Commons License (Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 Unported License), as described at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/.

    | Table of Contents

    Preprint Server